The catalyst 4 showed good conversion and ee up to the third
cycle, but its activity gradually decreased from the fourth cycle.
The new ionic catalyst 12-Ru showed somewhat better results than
the catalyst 4. This is probably due to immobilization of the
imidazolium moiety in the IL phase. It is noteworthy that the
enantioselectivity of 12-Ru showed good values, which are
comparable with those of 4.12
The authors thank Prof. Yoshiji Takemoto and Dr. Hideto
Miyabe (Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Kyoto
University) for helpful discussion. This research was financially
supported in part by the Frontier Research Program and the 21st
Century COE Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan, and a Grant-
In-Aid for the promotion of the advancement of education and
research in graduate schools in subsidies for ordinary expenses of
private schools from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation
for Private Schools.
Scheme 1
Ikuo Kawasaki,a Kazuya Tsunoda,a Tomoko Tsuji,a
Tomoko Yamaguchi,a Hiroki Shibuta,a Nozomi Uchida,a
Masayuki Yamashitaab and Shunsaku Ohta*ab
aDepartment of Functional Molecular Chemistry, Kyoto Pharmaceutical
University, Misasagi Yamashinaku, Kyoto 607-8414, Japan.
E-mail: sohta@mb.kyoto-phu.ac.jp
b21st Century COE program
Notes and references
{ Typical recycling procedure: acetophenone (120 mg, 1.0 mmol) was
added to a solution of the ionic ligand 12 (7.8 mg, 0.012 mmol) and
[RuCl2(benzene)]2 (2.5 mg, 0.005 mmol) in the IL 1 (1.0 mL) with stirring
under N2, followed by addition of the formic acid–triethylamine azeotropic
mixture13 (bp 108 uC/29 mmHg, 0.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred
at rt for 24 h. Then, n-hexane (3 6 5 ml) was added to the reaction mixture
and the products were extracted by decantation of the upper layer, and the
residual IL phase was dried in vacuo for 30 min. Acetophenone (120 mg,
1.0 mmol) and formic acid–triethylamine azeotropic mixture (0.5 mL) were
added to the remaining IL solution, and the second cycle of the reaction
was started.
Scheme 2 Regents and conditions: (a) (i) NaH, Br(CH2)4Cl, DMF, 100 uC
(ii) SOCl2, DMF, 90 uC, 54% (b) (i) (1S,2S)-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine,
Et3N, DCM, rt (ii) (Boc)2O, Et3N, DCM, rt, 70% (c) 1-methylimidazole,
80 uC, 95% (d) TFA, 0 uC, 97%.
the Boc group of 11 by treatment with TFA provided a novel ionic
ligand 12 in 35% overall yield from 8.
The recyclability of the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of
acetophenone 6a was tested, both with 4 and with 12 in the
presence of [RuCl2(benzene)]2 (12-Ru), in the IL 1 by using the
azeotrope at room temperature in 24 hour cycles, and the results
are listed in Table 2. We found that these catalysts, 4 and 12-Ru,
were fully soluble in the IL 1 under these reaction conditions and
they were easily recovered after extraction of the produced
1-phenylethanol by addition of an organic solvent, and the
residual IL phase was recycled and reused for the next reaction.{
1 Reviews: M. J. Palmer and M. Wills, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1999, 10,
2045; T. Ohkuma and R. Noyori, in Comprehensive Asymmetric
Catalysis I, ed. E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz and H. Yamamoto, Springer,
Berlin, 1999, p. 199.
2 Reviews: T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071; P. Wasserscheid and
W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3772; R. Sheldon, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 2399.
3 I. Kawasaki, S. Nakamura, S. Yanagitani, A. Kakuno, M. Yamashita
and S. Ohta, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 3095; S. Nakamura,
N. Tsuno, M. Yamashita, I. Kawasaki, S. Ohta and Y. Ohishi, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 429; I. Kawasaki, A. Domen, S. Kataoka,
K. Yamauchi, M. Yamashita and S. Ohta, Heterocycles, 2003, 60, 351.
4 Reviews: Q.-H. Fan, Y.-M. Li and A. S. C. Chan, Chem. Rev., 2002,
102, 3385; S. V. Dzyuba and R. A. Bartsch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2003, 42, 148; C. H. Song, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1033.
5 Recent contributions: Q. Yao and Y. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2003, 42, 3395; Z. Li and C.-G. Xia, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 2069;
X. Zhang, X. Fan, H. Niu and J. Wang, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 267;
N. Audic, H. Clavier, M. Mauduit and J.-C. Guillemin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 9248; Y. Gu, F. Shi and Y. Deng, J. Org. Chem.,
2004, 69, 391; S. B. Park and H. Alper, Chem. Commun., 2004,
1306; X. Mi, S. Luo, J. He and J.-P. Cheng, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45,
4567; S. B. Park and H. Alper, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45,
5515.
Table 2 Recycling of 4 and 12-Ru in the asymmetric transfer
hydrogenation of 6a with the azeotrope in 1a
Catalyst 4
Ligand 12-Rub
Cycle
Conversion (%)c
ee (%)c
Conversion (%)c
ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
a
96
99
95
88
63
93
92
92
92
93
98
.99
99
92
75
92
93
93
93
90
6 A. L. Monteiro, F. K. Zinn, R. F. de Souza and J. Dupont,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 177; R. A. Brawn, P. Pollet,
E. McKoon, C. A. Eckert, C. L. Liotta and P. G. Jessop, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 1254; S. Guernik, A. Wolfson, M. Herskowitz,
N. Greenspoon and S. Geresh, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2314; S. Lee,
b
Reaction at rt for 24 h and S/C 5 100. A mixture of 12 and
c
[RuCl2(benzene)]2 was used. Determined by capillary GLC analysis
using a chiral Cyclodex-B column.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 2134–2136 | 2135