As part of our general interest in the chemistry of
unsaturated sulfones,6,7 we decided to investigate Morita-
Baylis-Hillman reactions between aldimines 2 and the
conjugated dienyl sulfone 3. To our knowledge, the Morita-
Baylis-Hillman chemistry of dienyl sulfones, or other
similarly activated dienes, has not yet been explored, and
the anticipated products 4 comprise potentially useful func-
tionalized allylic amine derivatives. Moreover, the regener-
ated dienyl sulfone moiety provides possibilities for further
transformations.
Table 1. Morita-Baylis-Hillman Reactions of Aldimines 2
with Dienyl Sulfone 3a,b
A series of imines 2 were prepared from the corresponding
aldehydes by a standard procedure,8 and 1-(p-toluenesulfon-
yl)-1,3-butadiene (3) was obtained by a literature method.9
To optimize the conditions for the Morita-Baylis-Hillman
reaction, the imine 2a (R ) Ph) was treated with 3 in the
presence of DBU, DABCO, DMAP, triethylamine, triphen-
ylphosphine, and 3-hydroxyquinuclidine (HQD) in a variety
of solvents. The best results were typically obtained in the
presence of 25 mol % HQD10 in DMF at room temperature
for ca. 5 h. These conditions were then similarly applied to
imines 2b-j, and the results are shown in Table 1. In some
cases the imine 2 was employed in excess over the sulfone
3 to compensate for its partial hydrolysis during the reaction.
However, equimolar amounts of 2 and 3 afforded comparable
yields of 4 if rigorously anhydrous conditions were main-
tained. Although the dienyl sulfone 3 was prepared as the
E-isomer, the adducts 4 were obtained as E/Z mixtures,
presumably because of free rotation prior to elimination of
HQD in the product-forming step. The method is compatible
with both electron-withdrawing and -donating substituents
on the aryl moiety of the imine. Exceptions were observed
with the nitro- and cyano-substituted derivatives 2f and 2h,
respectively, which reacted very rapidly in DMF to afford
(5) For examples of the reaction of vinyl sulfones with aldehydes in
Morita-Baylis-Hillman reactions, see: (a) Auvray, P.; Knochel, P.;
Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 5095-5098. (b) Auvray, P.;
Knochel, P.; Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 6095-6106. (c)
Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Weichert, A.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Williams, D. J.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 5591-5602. (d) Weichert, A.; Hoffmann, H. M. R.
J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4098-4112.
(6) (a) For an overview of sulfone chemistry, see: Simpkins, N. S.
Sulphones in Organic Synthesis; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1993. (b) For a
review of vinyl sulfones, see: Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6951-
6984. (c) For a review of acetylenic and allenic sulfones, see: Back, T. G.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5263-5301. (d) For a review of dienyl sulfones,
see: Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Chinchilla, R.; Na´jera, C.; Yus, M. Chem. ReV. 1998,
98, 2291-2312.
a All reactions were performed in DMF at room temperature for 4-6 h,
except the preparations of 4f and 4h, which were carried out in THF for 16
and 20 h, respectively. b All reactions were performed in the presence of
25 mol % HQD except in the case of 4e, where 50 mol % was used.
(7) For recent examples, see: (a) Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 6566-6571. (b) Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 261-264. (c) Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
4543-4552. (d) Back, T. G.; Hamilton, M. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1779-
1781. (e) Back, T. G.; Parvez, M.; Wulff, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
2223-2233. (f) Back, T. G.; Parvez, M.; Zhai, H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
9389-9393. (g) Back, T. G.; Hamilton, M. D.; Lim, V. J. J.; Parvez, M. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 967-972.
complex mixtures of products, and with the more hindered
mesityl derivative 2j, which failed to react under all
attempted conditions. The additions to 2f and 2h were
achieved in THF, in which the reaction proceeded at a
significantly slower rate compared to DMF.
The major product in each successful example in Table 1
proved to be the corresponding E-isomer. This was estab-
lished unequivocally for 4a by NMR experiments. Thus,
when a D2O exchange was performed, the doublet at δ 5.91
ppm collapsed to a singlet, establishing it as the benzylic
proton R to the sulfonamide moiety. This signal showed a
strong NOE (16%) when the multiplet at δ 6.64, assigned
to the proton γ to the sulfone group in the diene moiety,
(8) Vishwakarma, L. C.; Stringer, O. D.; Davis, F. A. Org. Synth. 1988,
66, 203-210.
(9) Barluenga, J.; Mart´ınez-Gallo, J. M.; Na´jera, C.; Fan˜ana´s, F. J.; Yus,
M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 2605-2609.
(10) It is possible that the particular efficacy of HQD in this process is
due to stabilization of the zwitterion formed by its addition to the 2-position
of 3 through hydrogen-bonding between the HQD hydroxyl group and a
sulfone oxygen atom. Similar hydrogen-bonding effects have been postulated
in the additions of HQD to other activated alkenes. (a) Ameer, F.; Drewes,
S. E.; Freese, S.; Kaye, P. T. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 495-500. (b)
Drewes, S. E.; Freese, S. D.; Emslie, N. D.; Roos, G. H. P. Synth. Commun.
1988, 18, 1565-1572.
2378
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005