to access tricyclic 2,2′-anhydro-3-deoxy-3-isonucleosides and
their corresponding open forms (3-deoxy-3-isonucleosides),
along with a 3′-C-branched nucleoside derivative incorporat-
ing two units of theophylline.
Our key starting material is the 2-bromo sugar 1 (Scheme
1), which is readily available from the 1,2-diol 2 through
Table 1. Yields Obtained for the Addition Process via
Scheme 2
entry
nucleobase used
compound formed (yield %)a
1
2
3
4
5
thymine (Ty)
uracil (U)
5-fluoruracil (5-FU)
cytosine (Cy)
theophylline (Tph)
5T (71)
5U (73)
5F (58)
5C (na)b
6 (50)c
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the 2-Bromo Sugar 1
a Optimized yield. b No reaction was observed. c Mixture of isomers
(∼9:1).
the sugar in a highly stereoselective fashion, with the loss
of both substituents at C-2 and C-3, the anomeric position
remaining unreacted. On the other hand, when theophylline
(Tph) was used as a nucleobase,16 a different final product
was observed: a 3′-C-theophyllinyl nucleoside (6).
The structure of compounds 5 has been unambiguously
secured by X-ray diffraction for the thymine derivative 5T
(CCDC 250080, see Supporting Information), which presents
unique NMR patterns clearly recognizable on all the other
tricyclic derivatives. Unfortunately, we have not achieved
good crystals for 6 (or its benzoylated derivative 6Bz) in
attempts to ascertain its structure. Nevertheless, after an
extensive NMR study, we can conclude that structural
differences from compounds 5 are due to the insertion of a
new nucleobase unit at the anomeric position, not being a
tricycle derivative. This is possible since theophylline does
the formation of the 1,2-thiocarbonate sugar 3 and the
furanoid glycal 4.12 The latter quickly reacts with NBS in
aqueous THF9a,13 to afford compound 1 in high yield.14
When the bromo derivative 1 was treated with pyrimidinic
bases [thymine (Ty), uracil (U), 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), and
cytosine (Cy)] in the presence of DBU, the corresponding
tricyclic sugars 5 were formed (as tricyclic isonucleosides
analogues),15 with cytosine being the only exception for
which we were not able to obtain the corresponding iso-
nucleoside derivative (Scheme 2, Table 1).
(8) (a) Jung, M. E.; Nichols, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 347-355.
(b) D´ıaz, Y.; Bravo, F.; Castillo´n, S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6508-6511.
(c) Bera, S.; Nair, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5813-5815. (d) Lei, Z.;
Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.-R.; Chen, J.; Min, J.-M.; Zhang, L.-H. Nucleic Acids
Res. 2001, 29, 1470-1475. (e) Chattopadhyay, A.; Salaskar, A. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 785-789. (f) Nair, V.; Chun, B.-K. ArkiVoc
2003, i, 9-21.
(9) (a) Robles, R.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; Izquierdo, I.; Plaza, M. T.; Mota, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2959-2965. (b) AÄ lvarez de Cienfuegos,
L.; Mota, A. J.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; Robles, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 469-
473.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Tricyclic Isonucleosides 5 and
3′-C-Branched Nucleoside 6
(10) (a) AÄ lvarez de Cienfuegos, L.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; Mota, A. J.; Robles,
R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2743-2745. (b) Robles, R.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; AÄ lvarez
de Cienfuegos, L.; Mota, A. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 831-
838.
(11) Robles, R.; Izquierdo, I.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; Plaza, M. T.; Mota, A. J.;
AÄ lvarez de Cienfuegos, L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 399-405.
(12) Robles D´ıaz, R.; Rodr´ıguez Melgarejo, C.; Izquierdo Cubero, I.;
Plaza Lo´pez-Espinosa, M. T. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 300, 375-380.
(13) Robles-D´ıaz, R.; Rodr´ıguez Melgarejo, C.; Plaza Lo´pez-Espinosa,
M.-T.; Izquierdo Cubero, I. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7928-7929.
(14) Compound 4 (1 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was treated with NBS (1.1
mmol) and H2O (1 mL). After 10 min, TLC (ether) revealed that the reaction
was finished, showing a lower-running product. The mixture was concen-
trated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column
chromatography (1:1 ether/hexane), yielding 1 (0.85 mmol, 85%) as a
mixture of anomers.
(15) To a solution of the corresponding nucleobase (Ty, U, 5-FU, or
Tph, 2 mmol) in dry DMF (15 mL) containing DBU (3.2 mmol) was added
1 (1 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. After this time, TLC
(20:1 Cl2CH2/MeOH) showed that the reaction was finished (a lower-running
product appeared). An aqueous solution of KHSO4 (10%) was then added
until the pH became slightly acidic. The solution was evaporated under
reduced pressure, and the residue was extracted with Cl2CH2-H2O. The
organic layer was dried (MgSO4 anhydrous), filtered, and evaporated under
reduced pressure until dryness. The residue was purified by column
chromatography (20:1 Cl2CH2/MeOH) to yield respectively 5T, 5U, 5F,
and 6, the latter being a ∼9:1 mixture of isomers (see Table 1).
(16) Theophylline was chosen as a base because the absence of hydrogens
should prohibit the tricycle formation, as it has been experimentally proved.
It is noteworthy that nucleobases do not have a preference
for either the anomeric position or the C-2 position. These
positions are a priori highly sensitive to a possible nucleo-
philic attack. Conversely, they enter at the C-3 position on
2162
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 11, 2005