S. D. Edmondson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 3048–3052
3051
Table 5. Pharmacokinetic properties of selected DPP-IV inhibitors in
the rat (1/2 mpk iv/po) and hERG binding
plasma concentrations in this assay. The observed levels
of DPP-IV inhibition in the PD assay did not, however,
correspond to the expected efficacy of 22 in light of the
mouse DPP-IV potency (murine IC50 = 50 nM).
Compd Clp (mL/min/kg) t1/2 (h) F (%) hERG IC50 (lM)
18
22
28
32
38
50
0.25
4.8
3.1
3.5
16
67
76
4.6
41
1.5
1.2
>100
In order to resolve this apparent disconnect between effi-
cacy and in vitro potency, the potency of 22 against
mouse and human DPP-IV was measured in the pres-
ence of increasing amounts of mouse and human serum,
respectively (Table 7). Potency against mouse DPP-IV
steadily dropped with increasing serum concentrations,
displaying an IC50 = 230 nM at 50% mouse serum. This
serum shift was attributed to high levels of non-covalent
plasma protein binding. Protein binding was even more
pronounced in human serum, with an IC50 = 387 nM at
50% human serum. The measured potency of 22 in
mouse in the presence of 50% serum (IC50 = 230 nM)
agrees well with the pharmacodynamic study described
above. Thus, the high levels of protein binding observed
with 22 explain the apparent disconnect between efficacy
and plasma drug levels observed in the mouse pharma-
codynamic model.
55
0.20
1.7
<1
21
18
16
18
2.0
0.74
100
<1
properties (Table 5). Activity at hERG was also mea-
sured as an indicator of general off-target activity.6,14
Although 22 showed moderate activity against hERG,
this compound displayed excellent oral bioavailability
(67%) and half-life (3.5 h) in the rat. More potent com-
pounds such as 18, 28, and 50 all possess low bioavail-
abilities compared to 22. Analogs 32 and 38 are roughly
equipotent to 22 and display acceptable pharmacokinetic
profiles, but each of these compounds was inferior in
terms of selectivity against DPP8, DPP9, and hERG.
Consequently, 22 was chosen for further evaluation (Ta-
ble 6). We were pleased to find that this compound dis-
played excellent oral bioavailabilities and half-lives in
dogs and rhesus monkeys (Table 7).
In conclusion, optimization of anti-substituted b-polar
substituents of biarylphenylalanine derived DPP-IV
inhibitors led to the discovery of the potency and selec-
tivity enhancing dimethylamide group at the b-position.
Further investigation into pyrrolidine right-hand side
replacements and biaryl left-hand side substituents led
to the discovery of a series of highly potent and selective
phenylalanine derived DPP-IV inhibitors. Since com-
pound 22 exhibits the best balance of potency, selectiv-
ity, and rat pharmacokinetics of this series, this
compound was profiled further. Compound 22 possesses
an excellent pharmacokinetic profile in three species and
excellent in vivo efficacy in a lean mouse OGTT. Never-
theless, the off-target ion channel activity at hERG com-
bined with the observed serum shift of 22 has prompted
further investigation into optimization of this series of
inhibitors.
An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was used to as-
sess the ability of 22 to improve glucose tolerance in
mice. In lean animals, 22 was orally administered 1 h
prior to dextrose challenge and significantly reduced
blood glucose excursion in a dosage-dependent manner
from 0.1 mg/kg (21% reduction) to 3.0 mg/kg (64%
reduction). In the corresponding pharmacodynamic
(PD) assay, compound-mediated DPP-IV inhibition
and plasma compound concentrations were dosage-
dependent 10 min following dextrose challenge. At the
1.0 mg/kg dosage, the plasma concentration of 22 was
940 nM and plasma DPP-IV activity was inhibited by
>75%.15 The administration of 22 at dosages from 1.0
to 3 mg/kg also significantly increased active GLP-1
Acknowledgments
Table 6. Pharmacokinetic properties of 22 in the dog and rhesus
monkey (1/2 mpk iv/po)
The authors thank W. P. Feeney, J. E. Fenyk-Melody, J.
C. Hausamann, S. A. Iliff, C. N. Nunes, A. S. Parlapi-
ano, G. M. Seeburger, and K. G. Vakerich for dosing
the animals used in pharmacokinetic experiments.
References and notes
Species
Clp (mL/min/kg)
t1/2 (h)
F (%)
Dog
Rhesus
1.5
2.4
6.1
4.7
90
56
1. For lead DPP-IV references, see: (a) Mentlein, R. Expert
Opin. Invest. Drugs 2005, 14, 57; (b) Weber, A. E. J. Med.
Chem. 2004, 47, 4135; (c) Deacon, C. F. Diabetes 2004, 53,
2181; (d) Deacon, C. F.; Ahren, B.; Holst, J. J. Expert
Opin. Invest. Drugs 2004, 13, 1091; (e) Holst, J. J.; Deacon,
C. F. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2004, 4, 589.
2. For lead GLP-1 references, see: (a) Holst, J. J. Curr. Opin.
Endocrin. Diabetes 2005, 12, 56; (b) Knudsen, L. B. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4128; (c) Vahl, T. P.; DÕAlessio, D.
A. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2004, 13, 177.
Table 7. Potency of 22 in the presence of increasing amounts of mouse
and human serum (mouse and human DPP-IV IC50Õs are given in nM)
Species
0%
Serum
3%
Serum
15%
Serum
50%
Serum
80%
Serum
Mouse
Human
—
12
50
18
71
39
230
387
—
376
3. During, M. J.; Cao, L.; Zuzga, D. S.; Francis, J. S.;
Fitzsimons, H. L.; Jiao, X.; Bland, R. J.; Klugmann, M.;