C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
did not react at all with the terminal ester moiety of poly1b, which
was able to initiate the polymerization of 5 as the second step.
Finally, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were
performed to understand the present polymerization. The results
indicate that successful chain-growth polycondensation of the meta-
substituted monomers is based on the different reactivity of the
ester moieties between the polymer end group and monomer 2b,
as we expected; the polymer end group is much more reactive than
2b, which is deactivated by the +I effect of the aminyl anion at
the meta position. To address the different reactivity (electrophi-
licity) in question, we examined the propagation reaction of 4c (R3
) H) with 2c and the self-condensation of 2c as model reac-
tions using the DFT (B3LYP/6-31G*)8 method. The activation
energies for the propagation and self-condensation are 21.6 and
27.0 kcal/mol, respectively. On the basis of the geometries, energies,
and vibrational frequencies obtained, the theoretical rate constants
were then evaluated at 298.15 K and 1 atm. The reaction rate
constant (1.1 × 10-3 s-1) for the propagation is 8.6 × 103-fold
greater than that for the self-condensation (1.3 × 10-7 s-1) and,
hence, is consistent with the experimental finding that propagation
was observed exclusively over self-condensation; that is, successful
chain-growth polycondensation of meta-substituted aminobenzoic
ester monomers proceeded.
Figure 1. (A) 1H NMR spectrum of poly1b obtained by the polymerization
of 1b with 3b in the presence of 1.1 equiv of LiHMDS in THF at 0 °C. (B)
Mn and Mw/Mn values of poly1b, obtained with 1.1 equiv of LiHMDS in
the presence of 3b in THF ([1b]0 ) 0.40 M) at 0 °C, as a function of the
feed ratio of 1b to 3b. The lines indicate the calculated Mn values assuming
that one polymer chain forms per unit of 3b.
In conclusion, our present results demonstrate that not only para-
substituted AB-type aromatic monomers but also meta-substituted
ones undergo chain-growth polycondensation by virtue of different
inductive effects between monomer and polymer. This I effect-
assisted polycondensation should enable us to extend the synthesis
of well-defined condensation polymers from para-substituted
aromatic polymers to a variety of meta-substituted ones, which
possess higher solubility. Furthermore, this polymerization method
should be applicable to chain-growth polycondensation of even
aliphatic monomers, such as amino acid and lactic acid derivatives,
and so on. Experiments along these lines are in progress.
Figure 2. GPC profiles of block copolymerization of 1b and 5 by the
monomer addition method: (a) poly1b as a prepolymer ([1b]0/[3b]0 ) 20,
100% monomer conversion), Mn ) 4600, Mn/Mn ) 1.09; (b) poly1b-b-
poly5 as a postpolymer ([added 5]0/[3b]0 ) 23, 94% monomer conversion),
Mn ) 11 000, Mw/Mn ) 1.12.
expected to suppress the reaction between the deprotonated 1b
monomers (self-condensation). Thus, monomer 1b polymerized with
LiHMDS at 0 °C to yield a polymer with a defined molecular
weight and a very low polydispersity (entry 8). Furthermore, the
Mn value and the Mw/Mn ratio were not changed even 2 h after 1b
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis of monomer 1a and
1b, polymerization procedure, the synthesis of diblock copolymer of
1b and 5, and computational methods (PDF). This material is available
1
was consumed. The H NMR spectrum of the poly1b obtained
shows the signal a of the methyl group of the initiator 3b unit and
the signals of the terminal monomer units b, c, and d. The integral
ratio of a:b:c:d is 3:1:1:2, indicating that one initiator molecule
formed one polymer chain (Figure 1A). When the polymerization
of 1b was carried out with various feed ratios of 1b to initiator 3b
([1b]0/[3b]0), the observed Mn values of the polymers increased
linearly in proportion to the [1b]0/[3b]0 ratio, and the polydispersity
was quite narrow, maintaining an Mw/Mn ratio of less than 1.1 over
the entire range of the [1b]0/[3b]0 ratio. Moreover, the ratio of the
initiator unit to the end group was consistently 1.0, irrespective of
the [1b]0/[3b]0 ratio (Figure 1B). This polymerization behavior is
consistent with the features of living polymerization and is
consistent with the chain-growth polycondensation of the para-
substituted counterpart.1a
References
(1) (a) Yokozawa, T.; Asai, T.; Sugi, R.; Ishigooka, S.; Hiraoka, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8313. (b) Shibasaki, Y.; Araki, T.; Okazaki, M.;
Ueda, M. Polym. J. 2002, 34, 261.
(2) (a) Yokozawa, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Hiraoka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9902. (b) Yokoyama, A.; Iwashita, K.; Hirabayashi, K.; Aiyama, K.;
Yokozawa, T. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 4328. For chain-growth poly-
condensation for other polymers, see the following reviews: (c) Yokozawa,
T.; Yokoyama, A. Polym. J. 2004, 36, 65. (d) Yokozawa, T.; Yokoyama,
A. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 47.
(3) The -I effect of nitro and trifluoromethyl groups has been reported to be
applicable to the polycondensation of aromatic halide monomers bearing
these electron-withdrawing groups at the meta position. See: (a) Chung,
I. S.; Kim, S. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11071. (b) Lee, H. S.;
Kim, S. Y. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 665. (c) Kim, Y. J.;
Sik, C. I.; Kim, S. Y. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3809.
(4) When the polymerization of 1a was carried out in the presence of phenyl
4-nitrobenzoate as an initiator, the aminyl anion of 1a reacted not only
with the methyl ester moiety of the propagating chain end but also with
the amide carbonyl carbon of the initiator unit in the polymer, resulting
in a polymer with a broad molecular weight distribution.
With this established polymerization method, we tried to synthe-
size a well-defined diblock copolymer of meta- and para-substituted
poly(benzamide).6 Thus, 1b was polymerized in the presence of
3b ([1b]0/[3b]0 ) 20) and 2.2 equiv of LiHMDS to give a
prepolymer (Figure 2 (a), Mn ) 4600 (Mn(calcd) ) 4790), Mw/Mn
) 1.09). A fresh feed of methyl 4-(octylamino)benzoate 5 was
added to the prepolymer in the reaction mixture.7 The added 5 feed
was smoothly polymerized. The GPC chromatogram of the product
(Figure 2 (b)) was clearly shifted toward the high molecular weight
region, while retaining a narrow molecular weight distribution (Mn
) 11 000 (Mn(calcd) ) 9700), Mw/Mn ) 1.12), indicating successful
production of the block copolymer of 1b and 5. It should be noted
that excess LiHMDS in the polymerization of 1b as the first step
(5) Yokozawa, T.; Sugi, R.; Asai, T.; Yokoyama, A. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33,
272.
(6) For diblock copolymers of poly(p-benzamide) and poly(m-benzamide) by
the coupling reaction of each step-growth homopolymer, see: (a) Chavan,
N. N.; Ciferri, A.; Dell’Erba, C.; Novi, M.; Renamyor, C. S. Macromol.
Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 2415. (b) Cavalleri, P.; Ciferri, A.; Dell’Erba,
C.; Gabellini, A.; Novi, M. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1998, 199, 2087.
(7) For the polymerization of 3 with LiHMDS, see: Yokozawa, T.; Muroya,
D.; Sugi, R.; Yokoyama, A. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 979.
(8) (a) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. 1988, A38, 3098. (b) Becke, A. D. J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 1372. (c) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(d) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. 1988, B37, 785.
JA052566Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 29, 2005 10173