10.1002/anie.202105973
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
formation of 9 was very fast, and the yield reached up to 71%
within 0.5 h, and then decreased with prolonging the reaction time
(Figure S10). These above results revealed another pathway to
amine products (path b in Scheme 3): intermediate 6 directly
reacting with amine to produce imine C and its tautomer enamine
D, which undergoes the C-O bond cleavage to form A or B, and
subsequent hydrogenation to form final product E. Therefore, the
whole transformation of β-O-4 model compound with amine
through two pathways is proposed in Scheme 3. Obviously, the
present pathways bring advantages over reported β-O-4
conversion routes that need additional Cα-OH oxidation step in
the presence of oxidants and obtained different amination
products.[14]
has also been demonstrated. The production of lignin-derived
heteroatom products needs to overcome the structural complexity
of lignin in order to obtain the high yield of a pure product, while
avoiding the competing reaction to ensure sole amination reaction.
Our ongoing work focuses on improving the yield of benzylamines
from realistic lignin. We believe this methodology could provide
some new ideas to produce value-added chemicals from
heteroatom-participated biomass conversion.
Acknowledgements ((optional))
Support from National Key R&D Program of China
(2019YFC1905300), the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (22078317, 21878288, 21721004, 21690083), the
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of
Sciences (XDB17020100), and the 2017 Royal Society
International Collaboration Award (IC170044) is gratefully
acknowledged.
Scheme 4. The catalytic strategy for native lignin conversion.
Inspired by the above results, the production of benzylamines
from the conversion of realistic lignin was investigated (Scheme
4). Direct amination of lignin feedstock using current condition is
hard to realize, mainly because dehydrogenation of native lignin
to form keto-functional lignin obeying the mechanism of lignin
model compound in Scheme 3 over Pd/C did not occur, instead
the competitive hydrogenolysis reaction provided small amount of
phenol derivatives. Although current condition did not satisfy the
one-pot conversion of lignin, an alternative two-step process for
amination of lignin was developed. First, the lignin-oil was
obtained through mild depolymerization of lignin catalyzed by a
binuclear rhodium complex,[8a] leading to 8.3 wt% yield of
aromatic keto-monomers along with oligomers in the oily products
as determined by MALDI-TOF spectroscopy (Table S2 and Figure
S11-S14). Subsequently, direct conversion of lignin-oil with
pyrrolidine 2a over Pd/C was conducted, successful affording 0.4
wt% yield of corresponding benzylamines I-IV in Scheme 4 (see
Figures S15-S16 and Table S3 for identification of these
compounds). The relatively low yield of amine products might due
that the complexed oily components including large number of
oligomers are vast barriers for the amination reaction. Another
possible reason is the competitive hydrogenation reaction of the
keto-monomers. We are still working on the improvement of the
overall efficiency including the amination reaction. So far,
screening of the reaction conditions and efforts with other
reducing agent, nitrogen source, and oxidative modification of
lignin did not allow us to fully meet the target. Nevertheless, new
multifunctional catalytic system will be designed to couple all
elementary reactions, and particular attention will be paid to the
depolymerization of lignin to ketone intermediates and the
amination of aromatic ketones. Furthermore, amination of lignin[18]
prior to depolymerization might be another approach to obtain
benzylamines. Nevertheless, the above case offers a potential
protocol for the conversion of native lignin to bio-based
benzylamines. It is important to note that compounds I-IV in
Scheme 4 have broad applications in pharmaceuticals as a base
Keywords: Biomass • Lignin • Benzylamines• β-O-4 model
compounds
[1]
a) C. Li, X. Zhao, A. Wang, G. W. Huber, T. Zhang, Chem. Rev.
2015, 115, 11559-11624; b) J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L.
Jongerius, B. M. Weckhuysen, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3552-3599;
c) C.-H. Zhou, X. Xia, C.-X. Lin, D.-S. Tong, J. Beltramini, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5588-5617.
[2]
a) Z. Sun, B. Fridrich, A. de Santi, S. Elangovan, K. Barta, Chem.
Rev. 2018, 118, 614-678; b) R. Rinaldi, R. Jastrzebski, M. T. Clough,
J. Ralph, M. Kennema, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, B. M. Weckhuysen,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8164-8215; c) S. Van den Bosch,
W. Schutyser, R. Vanholme, T. Driessen, S. F. Koelewijn, T.
Renders, B. De Meester, W. J. J. Huijgen, W. Dehaen, C. M. Courtin,
B. Lagrain, W. Boerjan, B. F. Sels, Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8,
1748-1763.
[3]
[4]
a) A. Rahimi, A. Ulbrich, J. J. Coon, S. S. Stahl, Nature 2014, 515,
249-252; b) W. Schutyser, T. Renders, S. Van den Bosch, S. F.
Koelewijn, G. T. Beckham, B. F. Sels, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47,
852-908.
a) Y. M. Questell-Santiago, M. V. Galkin, K. Barta, J. S. Luterbacher,
Nature Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 311-330; b) L. Shuai, M. T. Amiri, Y. M.
Questell-Santiago, F. Heroguel, Y. Li, H. Kim, R. Meilan, C. Chapple,
J. Ralph, J. S. Luterbacher, Science 2016, 354, 329-333; c) W. Lan,
M. T. Amiri, C. M. Hunston, J. S. Luterbacher, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2018, 57, 1356-1360.
[5]
[6]
Y. Shao, Q. N. Xia, L. Dong, X. H. Liu, X. Han, S. F. Parker, Y. Q.
Cheng, L. L. Daemen, A. J. Ramirez-Cuesta, S. H. Yang, Y. Q.
Wang, Nature Commun. 2017, 8, 16104-16113 .
a) C. Zhao, Y. Kou, A. A. Lemonidou, X. Li, J. A. Lercher, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3987-3990; b) X. Li, B. Zhang, X. Pan, J.
Ji, Y. Ren, H. Wang, N. Ji, Q. Liu, C. Li, ChemSusChem. 2020, 13,
4409-4419.
[7]
[8]
a) R. G. Harms, I. I. E. Markovits, M. Drees, W. A. Herrmann, M.
Cokoja, F. E. Kühn, ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 429-434; b) P. J.
Deuss, M. Scott, F. Tran, N. J. Westwood, J. G. de Vries, K. Barta,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7456-7467.
a) Y. Liu, C. Li, W. Miao, W. Tang, D. Xue, C. Li, B. Zhang, J. Xiao,
A. Wang, T. Zhang, C. Wang, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4441-4447; b) Y.
Liu, C. Li, W. Miao, W. Tang, D. Xue, J. Xiao, T. Zhang, C. Wang,
Green Chem. 2020, 22, 33-38; c) J. M. Nichols, L. M. Bishop, R. G.
Bergman, J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12554-12555.
C. Crestini, P. Pro, V. Neri, R. Saladino, Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2005,
13, 2569-2578.
structural
frame
of
rolicyclidine.[19]
For
example
[9]
phenylcylohxylpyrrolidine possesses a component of sensory
deprivation owing to its inherent anesthetic property, and is
considered as intravenous anesthetic agent. [19]
[10]
C. J. Cooper, S. Alam, V. D. N. Nziko, R. C. Johnston, A. S. Ivanov,
Z. Y. Mou, D. B. Turpin, A. W. Rudie, T. J. Elder, J. J. Bozell, J. M.
Parks, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7225-7234.
a) V. Froidevaux, C. Negrell, S. Caillol, J.-P. Pascault, B. Boutevin,
Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14181-14224; b) G. Guillena, D. J. Ramón,
M. Yus, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1611-1641; c) P. Ruiz-Castillo, S. L.
Buchwald, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12564-12649; d) T. Irrgang, R.
Kempe, Chem. Rev. 2018, 119, 2524-2549; e) J. Liu, X. Qiu, X.
Huang, X. Luo, C. Zhang, J. Wei, J. Pan, Y. Liang, Y. Zhu, Q. Qin,
S. Song, N. Jiao, Nature Chem. 2018, 1, 82-92; f) R. V. Jagadeesh,
K. Murugesan, A. S. Alshammari, H. Neumann, M. M. Pohl, J.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed an efficient
[11]
strategy for the direct conversion of lignin β-O-4 model compound
into benzylamines through a one-pot C-O bond cleavage and
reductive amination, with secondary amines serving as both
amine sources and reducing agents. The feasibility for the
production of bio-based amines from lignin in a two-step process
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.