C.-T. Chang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6325–6328
6327
TBDMSO
HO
O
OH
O
OH
O
O
TBDMSO
TBDMSO
TBDMSO
a
b
c
+
OH
TBDMSO
16
24
25
22
21
OH
Scheme 5. Reagents andconditions: (a) H 5IO6, THF/Et2O, 15 h, rt, 58%; (b) BrÀPh3P+CH3, NaHMDS, THF, À30 °C to rt, 7 h, 20%; (c) Grubbsꢀ
catalyst (1st Gen), 6 mol % catalyst, CH2Cl2, 4 h, rt, 89%.
3. Nagaoka, H.; Miyakoshi, T.; Yamada, Y. Tetrahedron
generation catalyst [PhCH@RuCl2(PCy3)2] afforded 22
Lett. 1984, 25, 3621–3624.
4. Nagaoka, H.; Miyaoka, H.; Yamada, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 1573–1576.
5. Forsyth, C. J.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
in 89% yield. Oxidation of 22 with Dess–Martin period-
inane gave 23 in quantitative yield. Finally, hydrolysis of
23 with HFÆpy gave the desired compound 1 in 97%
yield. The NMR33 and other analytical data are identi-
3497–3505.
26
cal to the one reportedby us previously.
6. Tanaka, T.; Toru, T.; Okamura, N.; Hazato, A.; Sugiura,
S.; Manabe, K.; Kurozumi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
4103–4104.
7. Suzuki, M.; Yanagisawa, A.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1984, 25, 1383–1396.
8. Suzuki, M.; Yanagisawa, A.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 4718–4726.
It is interesting to note that cyclization of 21 using
Grubbsꢀ secondgeneration catalyst also afforded 22 in
excellent yield. However, we opted to use Grubbsꢀ first
generation catalyst since it is more economical.34–36
9. Kolb, M.; VanHijfte, L.; Ireland, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 6769–6772.
10. Noyori, R.; Suzuki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984,
23, 847–876.
11. Pudukulathan, Z.; Manna, S.; Hwang, S. W.; Khanapure,
S. P.; Lawson, J. A.; FitzGerald, G. A.; Rokach, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11953–11961.
12. Tanaka, T.; Kurozumi, S.; Toru, T.; Miura, S.; Koba-
yashi, M.; Ishimoto, S. Tetrahedron 1976, 32, 1713–1718.
13. Mitscher, L. A.; Clark, G. W. I.; Hudson, P. B. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1978, 19, 2553–2556.
14. Laumen, K.; Schneider, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
5875–5878.
15. Liu, Z.; He, L.; Zheng, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993,
4, 2277–2278.
16. Bhuniya, D.; Gupta, A. D.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 2847–2850.
17. Demir, A. S.; Sesenoglu, O. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2002, 13, 667–670.
To make sure that the optical purity of hydroxy group
in 1 was preservedafter a series of steps from D-arabi-
nose or 2-deoxy-D-ribose, a Mosher ester derivative
was preparedby acylation of 1 with (R)-(À)-a-meth-
oxy-a-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetyl chloride in pyridine
as described by us previously.26 By NMR analysis, a
high ee of >96% was observed.
We initially performedthe synthesis in a slightly simpler
way as shown in Scheme 5. The hydroxy group in 16 was
not protectedwith benzoyl group andthus upon treat-
ment with periodic acid resulted to the formation of lac-
tols 24 and 25. However, the one-carbon Wittig reaction
of 24 and 25 with 19 gave a low yieldof the desired
product 21 (ꢀ20%). We think that the synthesis shown
in Scheme 5 is, in spite of the low yieldWittig reaction,
a goodalternative to the one shown in Scheme 4.
18. Ghorpade, S. R.; Bastawade, K. B.; Gokhale, D. V.;
Shinde, P. D.; Mahajan, V. A.; Kalkote, U. R.; Ravin-
dranathan, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4115–
4122.
19. Noyori, R.; Tomino, I.; Yamada, M.; Nishizawa, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6717–6725.
In summary, we have developed an efficient synthesis of
4(S)-hydroxycyclopent-2-enone 1 andits edrivatives.
This approach not only allows us to prepare 1 in large
quantities but also with high optical purity.
20. Ogura, K.; Yamashita, M.; Tsuchihashi, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1976, 10, 759–762.
21. Gill, M.; Rickards, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20,
1539–1542.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from the Na-
tional Institutes of Health (DK-44730 (J.R.), HL-69835
(J.R.), HL-70128 (G.A.F.), AG-11542 (D.P.)); the NSF
for an AMX-360 NMR instrument (CHE-90-13145); the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-6254)
22. Nara, M.; Terashima, S.; Yamada, S. Tetrahedron 1980,
36, 3161–3170.
23. Kitamura, M.; Manabe, K.; Noyori, R.; Takaya, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 4719–4720.
24. Asami, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 1402.
25. Leighton, J. L.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
389–390.
26. Khanapure, S. P.; Najafi, N.; Manna, S.; Yang, J.-J.;
Rokach, J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7548–7551.
27. Srikrishna, A.; Srinivasa-Rao, M. Synlett 2004, 2, 374–
376.
´
(W.S.P.); the Heart andStroke Foundation of Que bec
(W.S.P.).
References and notes
28. Srikrishna, A.; Srinivasa-Rao, M.; Gharpure, S. J.;
Chandrasekhar-Babu, N. Synlett 2001, 12, 1986–1988.
29. Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413–
4450.
1. Hetmanski, M.; Purcell, N.; Stoodley, R. J.; Palfreyman,
M. N. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2089–2096.
2. Rowley, M.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4909–
4912.
30. Storm-Poulsen, C.; Madsen, R. Synthesis 2003, 1, 1–18.