Communications
ꢀ ꢀ
containing two V O V bridging oxygen atoms, 4) C1, and
Experimental Section
5) C2v. After the treatment of 1 with H2O2, six 183W NMR
signals are observed with an intensity ratio of 2:2:1:1:2:2; only
case (3) can explain the observed 183W NMR spectrum.[33] The
1H NMR spectrum shows two signals at d = 5.14(1H) and
9.45 ppm (1H). These two protons must exist in the symmetry
plane, which favors the Cs symmetry. The 51V NMR spectrum
shows one signal. Therefore, the NMR data indicate the
formation of a {VO-(m-OH)(m-OOH)-VO} species.
An aqueous solution of [g-1,2-H2SiV2W10O40]4ꢀ was prepared accord-
ing to reference [36], and the anion was isolated as the tetra-n-
butylammonium salt (TBA-1): K8[g-SiW10O36]·12H2O[37] (8 g,
2.7 mmol) was quickly dissolved in 1m HCl (28 mL), NaVO3 (0.5m,
11 mL, 5.5 mmol) was added, and the mixture was gently stirred for
5 min. The solution was filtered and [(n-C4H9)4N]Br (8 g, 25 mmol)
added in a single step. The resulting yellow precipitate was collected
by filtration and then washed with a large amount of water (300 mL).
The crude product was purified twice by precipitation (addition of 1 L
of H2O to an acetonitrile solution of TBA-1 (50 mL)). Analytically
pure TBA-1 was obtained as a pale-yellow powder. Yield: 7.43 g
(76%). Anal. calcd. for [(C4H9)4N]4[g-1,2-H2SiV2W10O40]·H2O: C
21.4, H 4.15, N 1.56, Si 0.78, V 2.83, W 51.1, H2O 0.50; found: C 21.4,
H 3.91, N 1.59, Si 0.79, V 2.88, W 51.2, H2O 0.50. 51V NMR (CD3CN):
An intense signal at d = ꢀ563.6 ppm (Dn1/2 = 133 Hz) attributed to
two equivalent vanadium atoms is observed. 183W NMR (CD3CN):
d = ꢀ82.2 (Dn1/2 = 9.6 Hz), ꢀ95.6 (Dn1/2 = 2.5 Hz), and ꢀ129.7 ppm
(Dn1/2 = 2.9 Hz) with an integrated intensity ratio of 2:1:2. 29Si NMR
(CD3CN): d = ꢀ84.0 ppm (Dn1/2 = 2.0 Hz). The UV/Vis spectrum (in
CH3CN) shows shoulder bands at 240 (e = 36000 mꢀ1 cmꢀ1), 285
(24000), and 350 nm (5900), characteristic of the g-Keggin struc-
ture.[38,39] IR (KBr): n˜ = 1151, 1106, 1057, 1004, 995, 966, 915, 904, 875,
The chemical shifts of the 51V and 183W NMR signals are
also in agreement with this idea: the oxo!peroxo trans-
formation for complexes of 51V, 95Mo, and 183W leads to
significant upfield shifts in the NMR signals (see Table S11 in
the Supporting Information). On the other hand, the oxo!
hydroperoxo transformation from HxMoO2(O2)2(2ꢀx)ꢀ (0 ꢃ x ꢃ
2ꢀ
1) to [MoO(O2)2OOH]2 produces a 15–30 ppm downfield
shift in the 95Mo signals;[34] no 51V NMR data have been
reported for the oxo!hydroperoxo transformation as far as
we know. In the present case, a downfield shift of 32 ppm is
observed for the 51V NMR signal after the treatment of 1 with
H2O2. Such a downfield shift is in accordance with the oxo!
hydroperoxo transformation. These NMR and CSI-MS data
strongly suggest that the {VO-(m-OH)2-VO} core in 1 reacts
with H2O2 to form a {VO-(m-OH)(m-OOH)-VO} species.
The methanol monoester of 1 (2) was easily formed by the
dehydrative condensation between the hydroxy group in 1
and methanol (equilibrium constant 75).[32] No diester was
formed even in the presence of an excess of methanol. The
anionic cluster 2 retains the g-Keggin structure with the two
vanadium atoms bridged by one protonated oxygen atom and
one methoxy group.[32] Therefore, the dehydrative condensa-
tion between 1 and H2O2 to form the hydroperoxo complex
should proceed as reported for bis(m-hydroxo) complexes of
the first row transition metals.[35] When one proton in the
{VO-(m-OH)2-VO} site in 1 was removed by titration with
1 equivalent of nBu4NOH with respect to 1, neither ester-
ification of 1 with methanol nor its epoxidation with H2O2
proceeded. All these results indicate that the {VO-(m-OH)2-
VO} core in 1 is the active site that forms {VO-(m-OH)(m-
OOH)-VO} species for the epoxidation of olefins with H2O2,
according to Equation (1) with R = OH, CH3.
840, 790, 691, 550, 519, 482, 457, 405 cmꢀ1
.
The epoxidation of gaseous substrates (propene and 1-butene)
was carried out in a Teflon-coated autoclave; a glass-tube reactor was
used for the other substrates. The epoxidation was carried out as
follows: catalyst (1.67 mm), CH3CN/tBuOH (1.5/1.5 mL), H2O2 (30%
aq., 33.3 mm), and substrate (propene, 6 atm; 1-butene, 1 atm; others,
33.3 mm) were charged in the reaction vessel. The reaction was
carried out at (293 ꢂ 0.2) K. The reaction solution was sampled
periodically and analyzed by GC in combination with mass spec-
trometry. The products were identified by comparing their mass and
NMR spectra with those of authentic samples. The carbon balance in
each experiment was in the range of 95–100%. The amount of H2O2
remaining after the reaction was analyzed by Ce4+/Ce3+ titration.[40]
After the reaction, the catalyst was recovered by evaporating the
reaction mixture to dryness, followed by washing with tBuOH and n-
hexane. TOF values were estimated from the initial rates below 10%
conversion of H2O2.
Received: February 9, 2005
Revised: May 24, 2005
Published online: July 11, 2005
Keywords: alkenes · epoxidation · hydrogen peroxide ·
.
polyoxometalates · vanadium
½g-1,2-H2SiV2W10O404ꢀ þ ROH
ð1Þ
! ½g-1,2-SiV2W10O38ðm-OHÞðm-ORÞ4ꢀ þ H2O
[1] T. Hirao, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 237, 1.
[2] T. Hirao, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2707.
As has been reported previously,[32] the esterification of
the {VO-(m-OH)2-VO} core in 1 with alcohols is sterically
controlled: the esters of primary alcohols with a bulky
substituent, such as neopentyl alcohol, or of secondary and
tertiary alcohols are hardly formed (equilibrium constant
< 0.02) because of the steric repulsion from the polyoxo-
metalate framework. For the same reason, no reaction of 1
with TBHP occurs. Thus, the hydroperoxo group in the
possible intermediate [g-1,2-SiV2W10O38(m-OH)(m-OOH)]4ꢀ
may also be sterically hindered, which could explain the
unique stereospecificity, diastereoselectivity, and regioselec-
tivity in the epoxidation catalysis (Figure S3 in the Supporting
Information).
[3] A. E. Shilov, G. B. Shulꢀpin, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2879.
[4] Thematic issue on vanadium-based catalysts for the selective
oxidation of hydrocarbons and their derivatives: Appl. Catal. A
1997, 157, 1 – 4 25.
[5] H. Sigel, A. Sigel, Vanadium and Its Role in Life, Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1995.
[6] F. Jiang, O. P. Anderson, S. M. Miller, J. Chen, M. Mahroof-
Tahir, D. C. Crans, Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 5439.
[7] A. Butler, M. J. Clague, G. E. Meister, Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 625.
[8] A. G. J. Ligtenbarg, R. Hage, B. L. Feringa, Coord. Chem. Rev.
2003, 237, 89.
[9] U. Schuchardt, M. C. Guerreiro, G. B. Shulꢀpin, Russ. Chem.
Bull. 1998, 107, 247.
[10] O. Bortolini, F. Di Furia, P. Scrimin, G. Modena, J. Mol. Catal.
1980, 7, 59.
5140
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5136 –5141