4662
J. Kim et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4661–4665
Figure 4. ADK analogues studied.
followed by hydrolysis with sodium hydroxide in a mixture of
methanol and water provided the desired ADKs (5–12) in 70–88%
yields.
Figure 2. Pharmacophore model of the ADKs: metal-binding diketoacid, two
hydrogen-bond acceptors, and/or a hydrogen-bond donor.
All compounds synthesized were assayed against HCV genotype
the protein, the terminal aryl group has only limited chance to
interact with the enzyme. Moreover, the pharmacophore-guided
docking study suggested that, in addition to the pharmacophore
model described above (Fig. 2), there are two separate aryl-binding
sites (hydrophobic pocket and groove, Fig. 3) which can accommo-
date the terminal aryl groups of the ADKs. In particular, both aryl-
binding domains have additional hydrophobic holes which are in
perfect size and shape for accommodating a chlorine substituent
(Fig. 3). Taken together, we envisaged that, upon binding of the
ADKs to the enzyme active site, the aryl linker determines the loca-
tion of the terminal aryl group of which hydrophobic interaction
with the aryl-binding site governs the antiviral activities of the
ADKs.
This paper describes a proof-of-concept effort designed to verify
the effects of the aryl linker (X@O or NH, Fig. 4) and the terminal
aryl substituents (Y = H, or Cl, Fig. 4) of the ADKs on their antiviral
activities.
The general procedure for syntheses of the ADK analogues was
adapted from the previous structure–activity relationship study by
Summa et al.4 (Scheme 1). Thus, O-benzylacetopheonones and N-
benzylacetopheonoes (4) were prepared by benzylation of the
appropriate acetophenones (3) with benzyl bromide or p-chloro
benzyl bromide in DMF in the presence of K2CO3 at 60 °C for
24 h (Scheme 1). Reaction of the acetophenones (4) thus obtained
with dimethyl oxalate in the presence of sodium methoxide in THF,
1b NS5B
Dc21 enzyme to assess their inhibitory activity (IC50,
Table 1).12 Also, all analogues were evaluated in a cell-based assay,
in which the HCV subgenomic replicon RNA-harboring NS5B gene
was transfected and expressed in the Huh-7 hepatoma cell lines,
and EC50 and CC50 values are reported (Table 1).13
The inhibitory activities of two known compounds (7 and 11)
against the target enzyme (IC50’s: 4.6 and 28 lM, respectively)
were comparable to the previously reported data (8.0 and 17 lM,
respectively).7,14 In general, the unsubstituted ADKs (5, 9 and 11)
showed only marginal anti-HCV activities (IC50’s: 8.3, 30, and
28
12) were clearly more potent inhibitors of the HCV NS5B polymer-
ase (IC50’s: 1.5, 2.0, and 0.96 M, respectively). Unlike other para-
lM), but the corresponding para-chloro analogues (6, 10 and
l
chloro analogues, compound 8 showed decreased antiviral activity
compared with its unsubstituted counterpart 7 (Table 1) whereas
the N-benzyl analogue of 8 (12) showed very potent enzyme inhib-
itory activity (IC50: 0.96 lM, Table 1). It is of another interest that,
even though the regioisomers 6 and 10 have different configura-
tions and thereby different spatial orientations of the terminal aryl
groups with respect to the diketoacid moieties, they show almost
equipotent antiviral activities.
Binding modes of the ADK analogues provided by the pharma-
cophore-guided docking were in fairly good agreement with the
structure–activity discussion described above (Fig. 5). First, com-
pounds with IC50 values less than 10 lM (5, 6, 10, 11, and 12) gave
docking poses at the active site but others (7, 8, and 9) failed to
dock. In particular, the meta configurations of 7 and 8 proved un-
able to locate the terminal aryl groups at either of the terminal
aryl-binding sites, and, as a result, the para-chloro substitution
has no effect on the anti-HCV effect of 8. Second, due to the differ-
ent locations of the aryl linkers as well as the terminal aryl groups
between 6 and 10 with respect to the diketoacid moieties, the
regioisomers 6 and 10 gave completely different docking poses
(Fig. 5a and b) of which terminal aromatic groups were bound to
the two different aryl-binding sites: the hydrophobic pocket and
the hydrophobic groove, respectively. Most importantly, even
though 7 and 8 failed to produce binding poses due to the lack of
the hydrophobic interactions with the aryl-binding sites, their N-
benzyl analogue 12 successfully located its terminal aryl group at
the hydrophobic pocket (Fig. 5c). The N-benzyl linker of 12 is
hydrogen-bonded to the carbonyl oxygen of Leu159 (Fig. 5c) as a
hydrogen-bond donor whereas the oxygen atom in the O-benzyl
linker is hydrogen-bonded to the amide NH of Leu159 (Fig. 5a) as
a hydrogen-bond acceptor. Thus, the subtle change in the hydrogen
bonding pattern of 12 induced by the presence of an amino group
as a hydrogen-bond donor instead of an acceptor enabled 12 to lo-
cate its terminal aromatic group at the hydrophobic pocket (Fig.
5c) leading to the remarkably improved IC50 value. Analysis of
the binding modes of 6 (Fig. 5a) and 12 (Fig. 5c) also reveals that
the interaction of the chlorine substituent with the hydrophobic
Figure 3. Two binding modes of the ADK analogues at the HCV NS5B polymerase:
Red and yellow sticks indicate ADK molecules 12 and 10 (Scheme 1) docked at the
hydrophobic pocket (red dotted circle) and groove (yellow dotted circle), respec-
tively. Hydrophobic holes inside the aryl-binding domains are denoted as blocked
arrows.