Organic Process Research & Development 2005, 9, 814−817
Communications to the Editor
Regioselective Synthesis of 2,6-Dimethyltetralin:
2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene
Key Precursor to
Byung Hyun Kim, Jong Gil Lee, Woon Ki Kim, and Young Gyu Kim*
School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National UniVersity, Seoul 151-744, Republic of Korea
Abstract:
addition of p-xylene to butene or butadiene to generate a
mixture of adducts and then cyclodehydrogenation to furnish
2,6-DMN.6 Kobe Steel and Mobil Technology Company
have investigated the process in which naphthalene or meth-
ylnaphthalene is used as a starting material to produce 2,6-
DMN.7,8 However, most of the above processes yield a mix-
ture of DMN isomers and have to go through an extra separa-
tion and/or purification step to produce pure 2,6-DMN. Some
of them are suffering from low yield of the desired product.
There are 10 possible isomers of DMN, and it is difficult
to obtain pure 2,6-DMN free from other DMN isomers using
conventional separation methods such as distillation or
solvent extraction. In particular, it is troublesome to cleanly
separate 2,6-DMN from 2,7-DMN because they are very
similar in some physical properties.9 Therefore, it is worth-
while to develop a synthetic method for 2,6-DMN free from
other isomers. We have recently developed a regioselective
synthetic process for 2,6-dimethyltetralin (2,6-DMT) whose
conversion to 2,6-DMN by catalytic oxidation is well
established10 and report the results as follows.11
A novel regioselective synthesis for 2,6-dimethyltetralin (2,6-
DMT), a key precursor to 2,6-dimethylnaphthalene (2,6-DMN),
is described. The synthesis comprises the following three steps;
the Heck reaction between commercially available 4-bromo-
toluene and 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol, the catalytic reduction of
the coupling products, and the acid-catalyzed cyclization of the
alcohol intermediate. The process has an advantage over the
established processes in that 2,6-DMT is obtained as the only
isomer, and the isomerization and/or the complicated separation
and purification steps are not required to produce pure 2,6-
DMT. 2,6-DMN could be also obtained as a major product
depending on the cyclization conditions.
Introduction
2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene (2,6-DMN) is an important raw
material in industry for the synthesis of poly(ethylene
naphthalate) (PEN) and liquid crystalline polymers.1 PEN
is a high performance polyester superior to poly(ethylene
terephthalate) (PET) in many properties such as mechanical,
thermal, and electrical properties. Therefore, it has received
continual attention since the late 1950s because of its high
growth potential in a variety of applications including
packaging. However, PEN has been slow in expanding its
market share because of short monomer supply that is related
to the price and availability of 2,6-DMN.
The mass production of 2,6-DMN by separation from
naphtha oil did not look feasible,2 and various synthetic
methods aimed at its economical production have been
proposed.1,3 BP Amoco has commercialized a four-step
process for 2,6-DMN that involves the isomerization of 1,5-
DMN derived from 5-(o-tolyl)pent-2-ene into 2,6-DMN and
the separation between them.4 Mitsubishi Gas Chemical has
also explored several potential routes to 2,6-DMN.5 Optatech
has studied a well designed process using base-catalyzed
Results and Discussion
Our retrosynthetic analysis for the regioselective synthesis
of 2,6-DMT is shown in Scheme 1. The Heck reaction
between commercially available compounds, 4-halotoluene
(4) and 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol (5), would provide the key
precursor 3 with an excellent regioselectivity after catalytic
reduction of the coupling product. The regioselectivity in
the Heck reaction of aryl halides with 1,1-disubstituted
alkenes is known to be nearly exclusive to yield the
substitution products at the terminal carbon of the alkenes
(4) (a) Lillwitz, L. D.; Karachewski, A. M. U.S. Patent 5,198,594, 1993. (b)
Sikkenga, D. L.; Zaenger, I. C.; Williams, G. S. U.S. Patent 5,030,781,
1991. (c) Choo, D. H.; Kim, H. J.; Kong, B. H.; Choi, I. S.; Ko, Y. C.; Lee,
H. C.; Kim, J. C.; Lee, J. S. J. Catal. 2002, 207, 183.
(5) (a) Abe, T.; Uchiyama, S.; Ojima, T.; Kida, K. U.S. Patent 5,008,479, 1991.
(b) Abe, T.; Ebata, S.; Machida, H.; Kida, K. U.S. Patent 5,023,390, 1991.
(6) Vahteristo, K.; Halme, E.; Koskimies, S.; Csicsery, S. M.; Laatikainen, M.;
Niemi, V. U.S. Patent 5,952,534, 1999.
(7) Sumitani, K.; Shimada, K. Japan Patent JP 4,013,637, 1992.
(8) Motoyuki, M.; Yamamoto, K.; McWilliams, J. P.; Bundens, R. G. U.S.
Patent 5,744,670, 1998.
(9) Kim, Y. D.; Lee, J. K.; Cho, Y. S. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 18, 971.
(10) Amelse, J. A. U.S. Patent 5,189,234, 1993.
* Corresponding author. Telephone: +82-2-880-8347. Fax: +82-2-885-6989.
E-mail: ygkim@snu.ac.kr.
(1) For a review, see: Lillwitz, L. D. Appl. Catal. A 2001, 221, 337.
(2) (a) Iwai, Y.; Higuchi, M.; Nishioka, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Arai, Y. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 5261 and references therein. (b) Kim, S. J.; Kim, S.
C.; Kawasaki, J. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 179.
(3) (a) Chen, T.; Kang, N. Y.; Lee, C. W.; Kim, H. Y.; Hong, S. B.; Roh, H.
D.; Park, Y.-K. Catal. Today 2004, 93, 371. (b) Millini, R.; Frigerio, F.;
Bellussi, G.; Pazzuconi, G.; Perego, C.; Pollesel, P.; Romano, U. J. Catal.
2003, 217, 298. (c) Pu, S.-B.; Inui, T. Appl. Catal. A 1996, 146, 305.
(11) (a) Presented at the 229th American Chemical Society National Meeting,
ORGN No. 881, San Diego, CA, March 13-17, 2005. (b) Kim, Y. G.;
Kim, W. K.; Kim, B. H.; Lee, J. G. International application No. PCT/
KR2005/000507, 2005.
814
•
Vol. 9, No. 6, 2005 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op050072g CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/13/2005