Allylpalladium Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 21, 2005 4963
Since the phosphines tested differed only in the mesityl
and cyclohexyl groups, in this work we obtained a group
of P-stereogenic phosphines by changing two different
substituents. Hence, we prepared organometallic pre-
cursors containing the η3-2-Me-C3H4 and the bulkier
nonsymmetric η3-1-Ph-C3H4 allyl ligands to see whether
it was possible to evaluate the efficiency of the phos-
phine ligand in the hydrovinylation reaction with the
isomer distribution of the allyl complexes in solution.
Perdeuterated styrene was used to support the proposed
mechanism. Some functionalized styrene derivatives
were also tested to check the effect of a secondary
coordination position in the substrate.
(NEt2)2. The crude solutions of the oxazaphospholidine
adducts showed a diastereomeric excess of 92% and
88%, respectively.22b,c,25 The solid compounds separated
were pure diastereomers. Since the use of the amino-
indanol did not represent any advantage, it was more
convenient to continue using the ephedrine as chiral
auxiliary.
The limitations of the Juge´ method in terms of the
type and order of the successive introduction of different
substituents preclude the preparation of a series of
ligands containing -Me, -i-Pr, and -t-Bu groups.
Although the t-Bu substituent can be introduced as the
first one over the ephedrine adduct, the subsequent
methanolysis does not occur.26 As the second substitu-
ent, the associative nature of the substitution reaction
blocked the process. Furthermore, the preparation of
isopropyl phosphines is very slow, about 12 h being
required to complete the reaction compared with 2 h
for methyl substitution. To overcome this problem, the
formation of P-Cl intermediates has been proposed.27
Selection of the groups to be attached to the phosphorus
atom seeks to increase regularly the steric hindrance
of the phosphine and also modify the conformation of
the biphenylyl substituent with respect to the P-B
bond. The methylphosphines S-PPhMeR (R ) o-Ph2 and
1-Naph) have been prepared before,28a,b although PPhMe-
(9-Phen) was obtained in racemic form.28c
The crystal structure of P-borane adducts 3bx, 3cx,
and 3cy (b ) 9-Phen, c ) o-Ph2, x ) Me, y ) i-Pr) was
determined to confirm the expected S-isomer geometry
of the stereogenic center. The distances and angles
measured (Table 1) were similar to those reported for
analogous molecules.28a,29 The disposition of the bi-
phenylyl group is not modified by changing the methyl
(3cx) for the i-Pr (3cy) alkyl substituents (Figure 1).
The relative steric hindrance of the three substituents
can be envisaged using the mean value of the three BPC
angles. Smaller angles should represent higher steric
hindrance, so the order proves to be 3cx ∼ 3cy > 3d >
3bx > 3ax (113.9°)28a (a ) Naph, b ) 9-Phen, c ) o-Ph2,
x ) Me, y ) i-Pr).
Results and Discussion
Phosphine Preparation. P-Stereogenic phosphines
have been prepared by several methods,16 such as the
resolution of racemates,15,17 stereoselective synthesis,
and asymmetric catalysis.18 In direct synthesis, the use
of stoichiometric chiral auxiliaries is needed. The re-
ported methods are based on the pairs (-)-menthol/
phosphine,19 sparteine/dimethylphosphines,20 dynamic
resolution with sparteine-n-BuLi,21 the adduct ephe-
drine/dihalophosphine,22 and the Michaelis-Arbuzov and
the Staudinger reaction to obtain P-stereogenic phos-
phine oxides.23
We used the method developed by Juge´22 and reported
by several groups24 (Scheme 1). Initially, the amino
alcohol (1R,2S)-ephedrine and the most rigid (1R,2S)-
1-amino-2-indanol were tested to achieve the best di-
astereomer discrimination in the reaction with PPh-
(16) (a) Pietrusiewicz, K. M.; Zablocka, M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94,
1375. (b) Yamanoi, Y.; Imamoto, T. Rev. Heteroat. Chem. 1999, 20,
227. (c) Ohff, M.; Holz, J.; Quirmbach, M.; Bo¨rner, A. Synthesis 1998,
1391.
(17) (a) Horner, L.; Winkler, H.; Rapp, A.; Mentrup, A.; Hoffmann,
H.; Beck, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1961, 5, 161. (b) Tani, K.; Brown, L. D.;
Ahmed, J.; Ibers, J. A.; Yokota, M.; Nakamura, A.; Otsuka, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7876. (c) Otsuka, S.; Nakamura, A.; Kano, T.;
Tani, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 4301. (d) Wild, S. B. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 1997, 166, 2291. (e) Leung, P. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 169.
(f) Lim, C.; Leung, P. H.; Sim, K. Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5,
1883. (g) Liu, A.; Mok, K. F.; Leung, P. H. Chem. Commun. 1997, 2397.
(h) He, G.; Mok, K. F.; Leung, P. H. Organometallics 1999, 18, 4027.
(i) Gladiali, S.; Dore, A.; Fabbri, D.; De Lucchi, O.; Manassero, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 511. (j) Pabel, M.; Willis, A. C.; Wild,
S. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1835. (k) Dunina, V. V.;
Golovan, E. B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2747. (l) Dunina, V.
V.; Kuzmina, L. G.; Rubina, M. Y.; Grishin. Y. K.; Veits, Y. A.;
Kazakova, E. I. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 1483. (m) Albert,
J.; Granell, J.; M´ınguez, J.; Muller, G.; Sainz, D.; Valerga, P. Orga-
nometallics 1997, 16, 3561.
(18) Moncarz, J. R.; Brunker, T. J.; Glueck, D. S.; Sommer, R. D.;
Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1180.
(19) (a) Imamoto, T.; Oshiki, T.; Onozawa, T.; Kusumoto, T.; Sato,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5244. (b) Watanabe, T.; Gridnev, I.
D.; Imamoto, T. Chirality 2000, 12, 346. (c) Koide, Y.; Sakamoto, A.
T.; Imamoto, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 28, 3375.
(20) (a) Imamoto, T.; Watanabe, J.; Wada, Y.; Masuda, H.; Yamada,
H.; Tsuruta, H.; Matsukawa, S.; Yamaguchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 1635. (b) Gridnev, I. D.; Higashi, N.; Imamoto, T. Organo-
metallics 2001, 20, 4542. (c) Oohara, N.; Katagiri, K.; Imamoto, T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2171.
When the preparation of the isopropyl-phenanthryl-
protected phosphine was attempted using the standard
protocol, a new, different product was obtained (Scheme
2).
The addition of a slight excess of 2-propyllithium gave
a mixture of the starting protected phosphinite 2b (δP
(24) (a) Nettekoven, U.; Kamer, P. C. J.; Widhalm, M.; van Leeuwen,
P. W. N. M. Organometallics 2000, 19, 4596. (b) Nettekoven, U.;
Widhalm, M.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Mereitner,
K.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L. Organometallics 2000, 19, 2299. (c) Nettek-
oven, U.; Widhalm, M.; Kalchhauser, H.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen,
P. W. N. M.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 759. (d)
Brown, J. M.; Laing, J. C. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 529, 435. (e)
Maienza, F.; Wo¨rle, H.; Steffanut, P.; Mezzetti, A.; Spindler, F.
Organometallics 1999, 18, 1041. (f) Colby, E. A.; Jamison, T. F. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 156.
(25) Richter, W. J. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 2328.
(26) Rippert, A. J.; Linden, A.; Hansen, H. J. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000,
83, 311.
(27) (a) Bauduin, C.; Moulin, D.; Kaloun, E. B.; Darcel, C.; Juge´, S.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4293. (b) Humbel, S.; Bertrand, C.; Darcel,
C.; Bauduin, C.; Juge´, S. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 420.
(21) Wolfe, B.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5116.
(22) (a) Juge´, S.; Genet, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 21, 2783. (b)
Juge´, S.; Stephan, M.; Lafitte, J. A.; Genet, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6357. (c) Juge´, S.; Stephan, M.; Merde`s, R.; Genet, J. P.;
Halut-Desportes, S. Chem. Commun. 1993, 531. (d) Moulin, D.; Bago,
S.; Bauduin, C.; Darcel, C.; Juge´, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000,
11, 3939. (e) Moulin, D.; Darcel, C.; Juge´, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1999, 10, 4729. (f) Moulin, D.; Bago, S.; Bauduin, C.; Darcel, C.; Juge´,
S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3939.
(28) (a) Stoop, R. M.; Mezzetti, A.; Spindler, F. Organometallics
1998, 17, 668. (b) Tsuruta, H.; Imamoto, T. Synlett 2001, 999. (c)
Pescher, P.; Caude, M.; Rosset, R.; Tambute´, A.; Oliveros, L. Nouv. J.
Chim. 1985, 9, 621.
(29) (a) Nagata, K.; Matsukawa, S.; Imamoto, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 4185. (b) Vedejs, E.; Donde, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2337.
(23) (a) Juge´, S.; Genet, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2783. (b)
Andersen, N. G.; Ramsden, P. D.; Che, D.; Parvez, M.; Keay, B. A. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7478.