K. Yamamoto et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4932–4935
4935
3. Gidenne, T. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 81, 105.
OMe
MPMO
MPM
4. Matsuda, H.; Oohara, K.; Morii, Y.; Hashimoto, M.;
Miyairi, K.; Okuno, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13,
1063.
5. Shimizu, T.; Miyairi, K.; Okuno, T. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000,
267, 2380.
COOMe
O
δ
MPMO
MPMO
O
O
COOMe
O
flipping
TESOTf
MPMO
MPMO
MPMO
O
δ
O
NH
MPMO
MPMO
CCl3
24
25
26
6. Shimizu, T.; Nakatsu, T.; Miyairi, K.; Okuno, T.; Kato,
H. Acta Crystallogr. D 2001, 57, 1171.
Scheme 3.
7. Cao, H.; Yu, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4337.
8. (a) We used molecular dynamic (MD) simulation
program COSMOS90 developed by one of the authors
of this paper (M. Saito). To perform MD simulations of
endo-PG 1 with galacturonic acids, we extended COS-
MOS90 to make it possible to simulate sugar moieties
based on the glycam force field. However, glycam did
not contain the parameters for sulfur-substituted ana-
logues. They were prepared by performing ab initio
molecular orbital calculations (HF/6-31G*), employing
a-1,4-linked digalacturonic acid. MD simulation of
endo-PG 1 with the sulfur analogue was performed by
slowly changing the force field of the carbohydrate
analogue to the sulfur analogue for 40 ps and then
maintaining the force field for 140 ps. The details will be
reported elsewhere shortly by Saito et al. COSMOS90:
Saito, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4055; Glycam:
(b) Kirschner, K. N.; Woods, R. J. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 10541.
9. The detail will be reported by Kato and Shimizu shortly.
10. Driguez, H. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 86.
11. Evans, M. E. Carbohydr. Res. 1972, 21, 473.
12. Van den Bos, L. J.; Codee, J. D. C.; Van der Toorn, J. C.;
Boltje, T. J.; Van Boom, J. H.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Van der
Marel, G. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2165.
13. Blanc-Muasser, M.; Vigne, L.; Driguez, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 3869.
14. Magaud, D.; Grandjean, C.; Doutheau, A.; Anker, D.;
Shevchik, V.; Cotte-Pattatb, N.; Robert-Baudouy, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 241.
Finally, all protective groups of 20 were removed. The
MPM ethers were cleaved by DDQ oxidation without
affecting the sulfide function4 to give triol 21 in 88%
yield. The following basic treatment hydrolyzed all ester
groups. Ion exchange column chromatography (Dowex
50W, H+ form) after the reaction provided a pure sam-
ple of 3 as a white powder.16 Preliminary enzymatic
studies revealed that 3 inhibited hydrolysis of oligo-
galacturonic acid by endo-PG 1 and was stable under
these conditions. The experiments employing surface
plasmon resonance17 revealed the KD value of 3 to be
0.2 lmol/L.18
As described, we designed and synthesized a sulfur ana-
logue of trigalacturonic acid 3 as a stable mimic of the
natural substrate. Computer modeling calculations sug-
gested that 3 would be a stable analogue that can bind
with endo-PG 1 in the same manner as the natural sub-
strate. In fact, 3 was not only stable in the presence of
endo-PG 1 but also made a stable complex with the tar-
get enzyme. In these studies, we also demonstrated that
the CSP group is a useful protective group that can be
readily activated by TBAF under aprotic conditions.
These findings resulted in the successful preparation of
3 in sufficient quantity for the enzymatic studies
(>100 mg). Detailed structural and thermodynamic
studies on the complex using X-ray crystallographic
analysis, calorimetric experiments, and longer-time
MD simulations are under investigation in our
laboratories.
15. Schmidt, R. R.; Jung, K.-H. In Preparative Carbohydrate
Chemistry; Hanessian, S., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York,
1997, pp 283–312.
25
1
16. ½aꢁD ¼ þ133ꢂ (c 0.50, H2O), H NMR (400 MHz, 6.7 mg/
1.0 mL of D2O) d 3.28 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.44 (1H, dd,
J = 3.9, 10.4 Hz, C2H), 3.57 (1H, dd, J = 1.8, 4.6 Hz,
C4H), 3.61 (1H, dd, J = 3.9, 10.5 Hz, C20H), 3.78 (1H, dd,
J = 5.4, 11.4 Hz, C300H), 3.80 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 10.4 Hz,
C30H), 3.98 (1H, dd, J = 5.4, 10.2 Hz, C200H), 4.02 (1H,
dd, J = 4.4, 10.2 Hz, C3H), 4.20 (1H, dd, J = 1.4, 3.0 Hz,
C40H), 4.30 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz, C400H), 4.75 (2H, d,
J = 3.9 Hz, C1H, C5H), 4.929 (1H, s, C50H), 4.933 (1H, d,
J = 3.9 Hz, C10H), 5.05 (1H, s, C500H), 5.39 (1H, d,
J = 5.4 Hz, C100H), 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O) d 50.34,
55.51, 67.32, 67.68, 67.71, 68.60, 68.74, 69.26, 69.84, 69.86,
70.11, 70.84, 77.73, 87.29, 99.43, 99.94, 171.67, 172.18,
172.68 ppm. ESIMS (positive) m/z = 599 (M+Na)+, (neg-
ative), m/z = 575 (MꢀH)ꢀ.
Acknowledgments
Part of these studies was financially supported by Hiro-
saki University as Priority Studies. We thank President
Masahiko Endo of Hirosaki University for his fruitful
suggestions throughout these studies.
References and notes
1. Jensen, C. D.; Haskell, W.; Whittam, J. H. Am. J. Cardiol.
1997, 79, 34.
17. Biacore International AB, Rapsgatan 7, 754 50 Uppsala,
SE-754 50, Sweden, +46 18 67 57 00.
2. Zsivanovits, G.; MacDougall, A. J.; Smith, A. C.; Ring,
S. G. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1317.
18. Shinohara, Y.; Kim, F.; Shimizu, M.; Goto, M.; Tosu, M.;
Hasegawa, Y. Euro. J. Biochem. 1994, 223, 189.