Kovalevsky et al.
Results and Discussion
Type 1 occurs in compounds 6, 8, and 9 and is described
by slight distortions around the copper center, with θ angles
ranging from 87.1° to 89.7° for θx, 84.3° to 86° for θy, and
84.8° to 88.1° for θz.
Type 2 occurs in compounds 1, 2, 3, and 10 (the second
of the two independent molecules) and is manifested by the
rocking being more pronounced than the flattening distortion,
the θ angles being 78.2-89.8° for θx, 74.0-81.5° for θy,
and 81.5-88.1° for θz.
Type 3 occurs in compounds 4, 5, 7, 10 (the first
molecule), and 11, and is characterized by the flattening
being equal to or more pronounced than the rocking
distortion, the θ angles ranging from 80.2° to 88.8° for θx,
74.4° to 85.4° for θy, and 72.8° to 81.9° for θz.
While flattening-only lowers the molecular symmetry from
D2d to D2, and rocking-only leads to Cs symmetry, in all cases
both distortions occur to some extent, so that the actual
symmetry is lowered to C1.
+
Structures of the Cu(dmp)2 ion in Different Solids.
Crystallographic and selected structural data for complexes
1-11 are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Final
positional, isotropic, and anisotropic displacement parameters
together with full list of bond lengths and angles are listed
in the Tables S1-S44 of the Supporting Information.
Since the first synthesis of Cu(dmp)2+ by McMillin et al.5
in 1977 and the discovery9 that it is photoluminescent at room
temperature in solution, a great amount of effort has been
invested in the exploration of the photochemistry and
photophysics of this and related systems.10 However, the
+
reported Cu(dmp)2 structures are limited to room temper-
ature determinations,11 and a detailed study of the effect of
the packing in the crystal on the cation’s geometry and
spectroscopic behavior is lacking.
In the solids studied, the copper cation adopts a variety
of conformations with various degrees of rocking and
flattening distortions. A recent calculation shows the fre-
quencies of the normal modes corresponding to these
distortions to be only about 20 cm-1; thus, they can easily
be induced by relatively weak intermolecular forces.12
+
The least distorted geometry of the Cu(dmp)2 cation is
found in the tosylate complex 8, which shows rocking and
flattening of only 4° and 2°, respectively. The highest degree
of rocking distortion takes place in the tetrafluoroborate
acetone semisolvate compound 2, with a θy value of 74.0°,
while the most flattened copper(I) cation is that of the picrate
salt, the dmp planes being rotated with respect to each other
by almost 17° with θz equaling 72.8° (Figure 2). Although
the nitrate dihydrate complex 6 has a very insignificantly
distorted Cu(I) cation, it is 22.6° flattened (θz ) 67.4°) in
the case of a similar nonhydrated compound reported by
Hamalainen and co-workers.11e
The rocking distorts the molecules from a close-to-
tetrahedral to a trigonal pyramidal geometry. This results in
one of the Cu-N bonds moving to the axial position of the
trigonal pyramid, and consequently becoming longer than
the other three bonds. The flattening, on the other hand,
distorts the molecules toward the square planar geometry.
Following White and co-workers,11b these distortions can be
described by the three angles θx, θy and θz, where the first
two θ’s describe the rocking distortions and the third θz
describes the flattening (Figure 1). The perfect tetrahedral
geometry is illustrated by the three angles being 90°. In the
case of the trigonal pyramidal geometry, θx or θy is 0°, while
θz remains 90°. When the Cu(I) system is square planar, θx
and θy values reach 90°, while θz decreases to 0°.
It is worth noting that the copper atom is displaced from
one or both of the phenanthroline planes in all the complexes
(Table 2), and that this displacement is correlated with the
extent of the rocking distortion: the larger the rocking, the
more the copper is displaced. In complex 2, which exhibits
the largest rocking distortion, the copper atom is displaced
by 0.442 Å from the plane of one of the coordinated dmp
ligands. Flattening on the other hand does not produce such
large copper displacements. An additional correlation exists
between the rocking distortion and the lengthening of one
of the Cu-N bond distances. As one of the Cu-N bonds
gets closer to the axial position of the trigonal pyramid, it
becomes longer than the other three bonds in pseudoequa-
torial positions.
The Cu(dmp)2+ cations form π-π dimers in the majority
of the crystals studied. The exceptions are 1, 7, and 9, in
which the packing is such that the dmp ligands do not interact
with each other. The π-π stacking modes are schematically
illustrated in Figure 3. In 3, the dimers are interconnected
by the cocrystallized free dmp molecules, forming stacks
interrupted randomly by the included acetonitrile solvent
molecules. The distances between the π-π interacting dmp
planes in these dimers are in the range 3.30-3.60 Å. The
closest contact occurs in a dimer of complex 11, the distance
being 3.30 Å, although the dmp ligands involved do not
overlap much, as shown in Figure 3. The largest plane-to-
The distortions of complexes 1-11 are compared in Table
2. In the complexes studied, the θ angles range from 78.2°
to 89.8° for θx, from 74.0° to 86° for θy, and from 72.8° to
88.1° for θz. Three distinct types of Cu(dmp)2 geometries
can be distinguished (Table 2).
+
(11) (a) Hoffman, S. K.; Corvan, P. J.; Singh, P.; Sethulekshmi, C. N.;
Metzger, R. M.; Hatfield, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4608-
4617. (b) Dobson, J. F.; Green, B. E.; Healy, P. C.; Kennard, C. H.
L.; Pakawatchai, C.; White, A. H. Aust. J. Chem. 1984, 37, 649-
659. (c) Dessy, G.; Fares, V. Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1979, 8, 507-
510. (d) Kon, A. Yu.; Burshtein, I. F.; Proskina, N. N.; Ibragimov, B.
T. Koord. Khim. 1987, 13, 260-263. (e) Hamalainen, R.; Ahlgren,
M.; Turpeinen, U.; Raikas, T. Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1979, 8, 75-
80. (f) Hamalainen, R.; Turpeinen, U.; Ahlgren, M.; Raikas, T. Finn.
Chem. Lett. 1978, 199-202. (g) Blake, A. J.; Hill, S. J.; Hubberstey,
P.; Li, W.-S. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 909-916.
(12) Zgierski, M. Z. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 4045-4051.
8796 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 26, 2003