9872
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9872-9873
Scheme 1. Photochemical Bergman Cycloaromatization
Synthesis and Photochemical Activity of Designed
Enediynes
Graham B. Jones,* Justin M. Wright, Gary Plourde, II,
Ajay D. Purohit, Justin K. Wyatt, George Hynd, and
Farid Fouad
Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Laboratories
Department of Chemistry, Northeastern UniVersity
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Alicyclic Photo-Bergman Candidates
ReceiVed March 2, 2000
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed August 23, 2000
The enediynes are a growing class of antitumor agents, with
spectacular biological profiles.1 Nearly 20 discrete enediynes have
been discovered, and clinical trials of a number of these are
ongoing.2 While the in vitro and in vivo effectiveness of enediynes
against certain cancers is unquestioned, the exact mechanism(s)
of biological activity remains to be fully resolved. Enediynes per
se are biologically inactive, but undergo cycloaromatization
reactions which give rise to cytotoxic diyl radicals, which are
capable of inducing DNA strand scission at low concentration.1
Depending on local environment, however, it is also possible for
other events to occur. One potential class of targets is proteins.3
Excepting water, proteins are the most abundant constituents of
cells and extracellular fluids by weight. We recently demonstrated
that simple amino acids are viable targets for diyl radicals,
resulting in both degradation and dimerization via intermediate
carbon centered amino acyl radicals.4 Conventionally, the con-
trolled degradation of proteins is often accomplished through
affinity cleavage systems, typically containing a metal-redox
center tethered to an entity recognized by the protein of interest.5
Application of enediynes for this purpose could be an attractive
proposition but would require two conditions be met: (i) the
system must have affinity for a protein of interest and (ii) the
enediyne needs to be thermally stable until activated “on demand”.
An attractive method for activation lies in the photochemical
triggering of an otherwise unreactive enediyne. Indeed, examples
of the direct “photochemical Bergman” cyclization have been
reported.6-9 In most examples studied to date the vinyl moiety
of the enediyne is embedded in an arene, and mindful of this
restriction, we wished to design a family of alicyclic enediynes
1, and investigate their photochemical activation to diyls 2, as a
function of ring strain and electronic effects.10
Commencing from commercially available acyl chlorides 3,
the corresponding diketones 4 were produced via the intermediate
Weinreb amides (Scheme 2).11 Low-valent Ti-mediated coupling
gave 6 directly, but the yields were variable, in part due to
problems recovering product from complex mixtures. Alterna-
tively, conversion to bromides 5 followed by carbenoid coupling
gave 6 (n ) 1-5) in good yield on a preparative scale.12 Though
stable at room temperature, photochemical Bergman cyclo-
aromatization gave adducts 8 in moderate yield, presumably via
diyls 7 (Table 1). As had been found previously, the nature of
the hydrogen donor plays an important role in the conversion to
arene adduct.7 Thus, although consumption of enediyne was often
rapid using 1,4-cyclohexadiene, optimal yields of cycloaromati-
zation products were obtained using 2-propanol, the balance of
material typically composed of uncharacterized polymeric byprod-
ucts. Evidently ring strain effects play a role in the cycloaroma-
tization, with lower conversion efficiency observed with the C-7
and C-8 analogues despite the appreciable reduction in intra-
molecular “c-d” distances relative to the six-membered analogue
(Table 1).1 Though photo-Bergman cycloaromatization yields are
modest, the synthesis of this class of enediynes [4- through
8-membered] is noteworthy and may lead to many new applica-
tions in materials and polymer chemistry.13
With a route to photoactivated enediynes secure, we wished
to investigate interaction of the intermediate diyl radicals 2 with
protein targets, and accordingly sought to prepare a hydrophilic
variant, which was capable of recognizing protein architecture.
Our design was influenced by the work of Kumar,14 who reported
that an alkyl pyrenyl derivative of phenylalanine (Figure 1)
recognizes the proteins bovine serum albumin (BSA) and
lysozyme, inducing photocleavage following irradiation in the
presence of an electron acceptor.14 Molecular modeling studies
indicated that arene 14, the expected photocycloaromatization
product of enediyne 13 (Scheme 3), bears a close structural
resemblance to the reference probe, providing us with a logical
candidate for proof-of-principle studies.
* Address correspondence to this author.
(1) Smith, A. L.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2103.
(2) Xi, Z.; Goldberg, I. DNA Damaging enediyne compounds. In Com-
prehensiVe Natural Products Chemistry; Barton, D. H. R., Nakanishi, K., Eds.;
Pergamon: Oxford, 1999; Vol. 7, p 553.
(3) Zein, N.; Solomon, W.; Casazza, A. M.; Kadow, J. F.; Krishnan, B.
S.; Tun, M. M.; Vyas, D. M.; Doyle, T. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993,
3, 1351. Jones, G. B.; Kilgore, M. W.; Pollenz, R. S.; Li, A.; Mathews, J. E.;
Wright, J. M.; Huber, R. S.; Tate, P. L.; Price, T. L.; Sticca, R. P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1971.
(4) Jones, G. B.; Plourde, G.; Wright, J. W. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 811. Jones,
G. B.; Wright, J. M.; Hynd, G.; Wyatt, J. K.; Yancisin, M.; Brown, M. A.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1863.
(5) Rana, T. M.; Meares, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1859. Hoyer,
D.; Cho, H.; Schultz, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3249. Cuenoud, B.;
Tarasow, T. M.; Schepartz, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 895. Hegg, E. L.;
Burstyn, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7015. Wu, J.; Perrin, D. M.;
Sigman, D. S.; Kaback, H. R. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1995, 92, 9186. Parac, T.
N.; Kostic, N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5946. Kumar, C. V.;
Buranaprapuk, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4262. Miyake, R.; Owens, J.
T.; Xu, D.; Jackson, W. M.; Meares, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
7453.
(10) Schmittel, M.; Kiau, S. Chem. Lett. 1995, 953. Schmittel, M.; Kiau,
S. Liebigs Ann./Recl. 1997, 1391. Jones, G. B.; Plourde, G. W. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 1757.
(6) Funk, R. L.; Young, E. R. R.; Williams, R. M.; Flanagan, M. F.; Cecil,
T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3291.
(7) Turro, N. J.; Evenzahav, A.; Nicolaou, K. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 8089. Evenzahav, A.; Turro, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1835.
(8) Ramkumar, D.; Kalpana, M.; Varghese, B.; Sankararaman, S.; Ja-
gadeesh, M. N.; Chandrasekhar, J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2247.
(9) Kaneko, T.; Takahashi, M.; Hirama, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 1267.
(11) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815.
(12) Jones, G. B.; Wright,J. M.; Plourde, G. W., II; Hynd, G.; Huber, R.
S.; Mathews, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1937.
(13) John, J. A.; Tour, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5011.
(14) Kumar, C. V.; Buranaprapuk, A.; Opiteck, G. J.; Moyer, M. B.;
Jockusch, S.; Turro, N. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998, 95, 10361.
10.1021/ja000766z CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/23/2000