when 5 lL of pyridine was added to a toluene-d8 solution of
the precursor, RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4), and the subsequent reaction
with p–H2 monitored at 235 K, three hydride resonances were
observed; the signal at d −22.6 described above, and a pair of
doublets of triplets of doublets at d −18.9 and −19.7. The logical
identity of this species is Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)2(py).
In this study we aimed to demonstrate that parahydrogen can
be used to facilitate the detection of weakly bound ligands via the
observation of substantially enhanced and diagnostic hydride
signals in a suitable receptor complex. The intrinsic chemistry
of these systems however means that they proved unsuitable for
this role since they fail to exchange free and bound hydrogen at a
sufficient rate. Nonetheless, the addition of a sacrificial substrate
that acts to pull hydrogen through the metal-based manifold
does enable enhanced hydride resonance to be observed for the
pyridine containing dihydride adducts.
In an effort to activate the system to H2 addition, we also
studied the effect of replacing PPh3 with both PCy3 and PMe3.
Because of the large cone angle of PCy3 and the desire to
start with a pure complex we selected RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4)
as a suitable precursor. We were therefore surprised when
the preformed Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)2 we expected to obtain via
H2 addition to RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4) failed to coordinate the
added pyridine ligand. This proved to be consistent with a
revised formulation of the stable H2 addition product as the
tetrahydride dimer (H)2Rh(PCy3)2(l-Cl)2Rh(H)2(PCy3)2.23 The
order of ligand addition, proved to be critical since when
RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4) was reacted with pyridine first and H2 added
later, the formation of Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)2(py) was indicated.
This suggests that RhCl(PCy3)2(py) was formed,12,13 and H2
addition to form Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)2(py) becomes possible.
Neither Rh(Cl)(H)2(PMe3)3 nor [Rh(H)2(PMe3)4]Cl, however,
showed any sign of reacting with pyridine.
When the pyridine concentration was increased to
30 lL, the d −22.6 signal disappeared, while those for
Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)2(py) remained, and a second pair of hydride
resonances were observed at d −18.2 and −18.7 which ap-
peared as simple doublets of doublets of doublets. Signals for
this species were clearly visible in neat d5-pyridine solution.
The corresponding hydride resonances appeared at d −18.3
and −19.0 in pyridine-d5, and showed strong parahydrogen
enhancement at 235 K. Under these conditions, the signals
appear as distorted antiphase doublets of doublets of doublets
1
and proved to be coupled in the corresponding H–1H COSY
NMR dataset. In the corresponding 1H–31P HMQC correlation,
a single 31P signal was located at d 71.6 (JRhP = 142 Hz). When a
sample was prepared using 15N labelled pyridine, the resonance
at d −18.3 showed an additional 20 Hz coupling due to the
trans 15N centre which resonates at d −101. The structure of
Rh(Cl)(H)2(PCy3)(py)2 is indicated in Scheme 1.
Upon warming this sample to 335 K, a new species yielding
a single hydride resonance at d −19.6 was observed. This signal
appeared as doublet of triplets due to a single HRh coupling and
1
two equivalent cis HP splittings. A H–31P HMQC correlation
spectrum revealed that this hydride resonance coupled to a 31
P
signal at d 46.8. On the basis of this data and studies of Heaton
et al.,12 the product yielding these signals in assigned to the ionic
complex [Rh(H)2(PCy3)2(py)2]+Cl−.
Acknowledgements
S. B. D., R. Z., P. I. P. E. and J. A. A. would like to thank the Basic
Technology Programme for financial support. R. K. would like
to thank CSL for the sponsorship. S. B. D. is also grateful to the
University of York, SCL, BBSRC and Bruker UK (sponsorship
and spectrometer) for financial support.
In-situ reaction of RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4) with p-H2 in the presence
of PMe3 and pyridine
1H NMR observation of a toluene-d8 solution containing 1
equivalent of PMe3, 3 atm. p-H2, and a mixture of [Rh(Cl)-
(PCy3)2]2 and RhCl(PCy3)2(C2H4), led to the observation of
strong p-H2 based signals at d −9.4 and −18.6. The NMR data
for the product giving rise to these signals matched that previ-
ously reported for Rh(Cl)(H)2(PMe3)3 with [Rh(H)2(PMe3)4]Cl
being detected at greater PMe3 loadings.14 The addition of
pyridine to these systems failed to enable the detection of
any further species. This suggests that the Rh–PMe3 bond is
too strong to be readily broken and that systems based on
Rh(Cl)(PMe3)3 or [Rh(PMe3)4]Cl are unsuitable as precursors
for a pyridine sensor.
References
1 C. R. Bowers and D. P. Weitekamp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109,
5541.
2 M. S. Anwar, D. Blazina, H. A. Carteret, S. B. Duckett and J. A.
Jones, J. Chem. Phys., 2004, 400, 94.
3 T. C. Eisenschmid, R. U. Kirss, P. A. Deutsch, S. I. Hommeltoft, R.
Eisenberg, J. Bargon, R. G. Lawler and A. L. Balch, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1987, 109, 8089.
4 (a) R. Eisenberg, Acc. Chem. Res., 1991, 24, 100; (b) J. Natherer and J.
Bargon, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1997, 31, 293; (c) S. B.
Duckett and C. J. Sleigh, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1999,
34, 71; (d) S. B. Duckett and D. Blazina, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 16,
2901; (e) D. Blazina, S. B. Duckett, J. P. Dunne and C. Godard, Dalton
Trans., 2004, 17, 2601; (f) Recent Advances in Hydride Chemistry, ed.
M Peruzzini and R. Poli, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ISBD:
0-4444-50733-7, pp. 329–350.
5 (a) S. B. Duckett and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
5292; (b) S. B. Duckett, R. Eisenberg and A. S. Goldman, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993, 1185; (c) P. D. Morran, S. B. Duckett,
P. R. Howe, J. E. McGrady, S. A. Colebrooke, R. Eisenberg, M. G.
Partridge and J. A. B. Lohman, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999,
3949; (d) S. K. Hasnip, S. B. Duckett, D. R. Taylor, G. K. Barlow and
M. J. Taylor, Chem. Commun., 1999, 889; (e) P. Katting, A. Wandelt,
R. Selke and J. Bargon, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 13313; (f) S. B.
Duckett, C. L. Newell and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994,
116, 10548; S. B. Duckett, C. L. Newell and R. Eisenberg, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 2048; (g) S. A. Colebrook, S. B. Duckett, R. S.
Eisenberg and J. A. B. Lohman, Chem. Eur. J., 2004, 10, 2357; (h) S.
Aime, R. Gobetto and D. Canet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6770;
(i) S. Aime, W. Dastru, R. Gobetto, A. Russo, A. Viale and D. Canet,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 9702; (j) D. Blazina, S. B. Duckett, P. J.
Dyson and J. A. B. Lohman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 3874;
(k) D. Blazina, S. B. Duckett, P. J. Dyson and J. A. B. Lohman, Chem.
Eur. J., 2003, 9, 1046; (l) H. Heinrich, R. Giernoth, J. Bargon and
J. M. Brown, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1296; (m) A. Koch, C. Ulrich
and J. Bargon, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 3177; (n) C. Ulrich, A. Permin,
V. Petrosyan and J. Bargon, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2000, 889; (o) A.
Koch and J. Bargon, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 533.
Conclusions
In this paper, we have used the fact that both RhCl(PBz3)3
and RhCl(PPh3)3 add H2 to form Rh(III) dihydrides
with labile phosphine ligands to enable the detection of
RhCl(H)2(PR3)2(pyridine). The corresponding pyridine adducts
have been characterised by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy.
In the case of the PBz3 ligand system we also employed 4-
methylpyridine as a substrate. EXSY spectroscopy revealed
that these RhCl(H)2(PBz3)2(L) systems undergo hydride site
interchange via nitrogen donor dissociation and the formation
of the 16-electron intermediate RhCl(H)2(PR3)2 with equivalent
hydride ligands. The activation parameters for this process
were very similar for both pyridine and 4-methylpyridine.
The large positive DS‡ values of 137
12 and 121
27 J
K−1 mol−1 respectively are consistent with a dissociative process.
For these systems, the activation free energy, DG‡300, proved
better defined, and corresponds to 57.4
for 4-methylpyridine the value is 59.6
0.1 kJ mol−1 while
0.3 kJ mol−1. This
confirms that the barrier to the loss of 4-methylpyridine is 2.2
0.4 kJ mol−1 higher than that for pyridine and accounts for the
higher kinetic stability of such complexes.26
3 7 7 8
D a l t o n T r a n s . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 7 7 3 – 3 7 7 9