Mononuclear to Polynuclear Transition
1-3 dominated by a moderately intense (ꢀ: ca. 3600 for 1
and 12 300 and 13 100 M-1 cm-1 for 2 and 3, respectively)
and broad charge-transfer transition in the visible range
(700-650 nm). In addition, these also show transitions in
the UV-region, which are ascribed to intraligand charge
transfer. The solid-state absorption spectrum of 4 shows a
low-energy structured band near 700 nm. Interestingly, the
intensities of transitions for the dicopper complexes, 2 and
3, are much higher than those for the mononuclear copper
complexes, 1. Such observations were noted19 before in di-
and polynuclear systems having a repetition of units that are
responsible for the reference electronic transitions. Semiem-
pirical EHMO calculations on the complex 2 using the
CACAO program20 by Mealli and Proserpio indicated that
while the HOMO is an admixture of metal and ligand
orbitals, the LUMO is predominantly ligand orbitals. On the
other hand, the HOMO for each of the complexes 1, 3, and
4 is predominantly ligand orbitals while the LUMO is a
mixture of metal and ligand orbitals. Hence, the lowest
energy transition in the present copper(II) complexes may
be described as a π-π* transition,8 where the π-orbitals are
either an admixture of metal and ligand orbitals or ligand
orbitals.
C. Magnetic Studies. Room-temperature magnetic mo-
ments of the mononuclear copper(II) complexes 1a-c fall
in the range, 1.68-1.72 µB that are close to the spin-only
value 1.73 µB for a single unpaired electron. Variable-
temperature magnetic susceptibility data for the di- and
polynuclear complexes 2-4 were measured at temperature
ranging from 2.0 to 300 K. The dinuclear complex 2 showed
very weak antiferromagnetic behavior. The resulting plots
of the øM versus T and the øMT versus T are submitted as
Supporting Information (Figure S3). From the curve it is
observed that the øMT value is 0.91 cm3 K mol-1 at room
temperature, which decreases gradually with lowering of
temperature. The ømT ) 0.91 cm3 K mol-1 at 300 K is higher
than the spin-only value ømT ) 0.75 cm3 K mol-1 for the
uncorrelated two CuII (S ) 1/2) with g ) 2.00. Such a high
øMT value has been reported21 for other dinuclear copper(II)
complex such as [Cu2(t-bupy)4(N3)2](ClO4)2, where t-bupy
stands for 4-tert-butylpyridine. The temperature dependence
of ømT indicates that two CuII ions are coupled antiferro-
magnetically22 through the bridging ligands. The susceptibil-
ity data were fitted by the following expression derived23
by Bleany and Bowers:
Boltzman’s constant. A good-fitting curve was obtained for
the following parameters: J ) -1.04 cm-1; g ) 2.04.
The resulting plot of the øMT versus T for 3 is submitted
as Supporting Information (Figure S4). At room temperature
øMT is equal to 0.76 cm3 K mol-1 (300 K). This value at
room temperature is consistent with the spin-only value øMT
) 0.75 cm3 K mol-1 for the uncorrelated two CuII (S ) 1/2)
with g ) 2.00, and øMT is almost constant until 100 K. On
further cooling, øMT increases rapidly and reaches a maxi-
mum (0.95 cm3 K mol-1) at 5.0 K, after which it decreases
slightly to 0.90 cm3 K mol-1 at 2 K. This curve is as expected
for a dominant ferromagnetic coupling with weak intermo-
lecular antiferromagnetic interactions and/or zero-field split-
ting of the triplet ground state which would account for the
decrease of øMT at 5 K. The øMT data for temperature range
from 2 to 300 K were fitted by the modified Bleany and
Bowers expression:23
2Ng2â2
ø )
k(T - Θ)[3 + exp(-J/kT)]
A good-fitting curve was obtained for the following param-
eters: J ) 9.88 cm-1; g ) 2.01; Θ ) -0.24 K. The small
positive J value indicates a weak ferromagnetic24 coupling
between the two copper(II) ions.
The resulting plot of the øMT versus T for 4 is submitted
as Supporting Information (Figure S5). The room-tempera-
ture øMT is equal to 0.76 cm3 K mol-1 (300 K), which is
consistent with the spin-only value øMT ) 0.75 cm3 K mol-1
for the uncorrelated two CuII (S ) 1/2) with g ) 2.00, and
øMT decreases slowly until 20 K and then decreases rapidly
due to weak antiferromagnetic coupling of Cu ions. The
room-temperature magnetic moment of the polycrystalline
powder of complex 4 showed an experimental effective
magnetic moment (µexp) of 1.80 µB, which is slightly higher
than the spin-only magnetic moment for copper(II) ion (1.73
µB). The molar magnetic susceptibility data for temperature
range from 2 to 300 K were fitted by Bonner and Fisher’s
model,25 and the best-fitted parameters obtained were J )
-1.31 cm-1 and g ) 2.09.
The room-temperature EPR spectrum of each of the
mononuclear complexes 1a-c in dichloromethane solution
exhibits a four-line spectrum with hyperfine coupling
constant (A) of 75-80 G and gav ) 2.10. In contrast, the
solutions of the dinuclear complexes 2 and 3 both are EPR
inactive at room temperature. However, the frozen solution
(dichloromethane-toluene, 1:1) of 2 shows a broad axial
spectrum (2: gII, 2.03; AII, 83 G; g , 2.00) with ill-defined
hyperfine components of the gII signals. A very broad
spectrum centered at g ) 2.01-2.04 is observed for the
frozen solution of compound 3. Compound 4 is insoluble,
and hence, its solution spectrum could not be recorded. It
exhibits an axial spectrum (gII, 2.10; g-, 2.07) in the solid
state, but no hyperfine component was observed. Broadening
2Ng2â2
ø )
kT[3 + exp(-J/kT)]
Here N is Avogadro’s number, â the Bohr magneton, and k
(19) Rillema, D. P.; Sahai, R.; Matthvews, P.; Edwarts, A. K.; Shaver, R.
J.; Morgan, L. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 167.
(20) Mealli, C.; Proserpio, D. M. J. Chem. Educ. 1990, 67, 399.
(21) Sikorav, S.; Bkouche-Waksman, I.; Khan, O. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23,
490.
(22) (a) Castillo, O.; Luque, A.; Sertucha, J.; Roma´n, P.; Lloret, F. Inorg.
Chem. 2000, 39, 6142. (b) Girerd, J. J.; Khan, O.; Verdaguer, M. Inorg.
Chem. 1980, 19, 274.
(23) Bleany, B.; Bowers, K. D. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1952, 214,
451.
(24) (a) Reddy, P. A. M.; Nethaji, M.; Chakravarty, A. R. Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2003 2318. (b) Fitzgerald, W.; Foley, J.; McSweeney, D.; Ray,
N.; Sheahan, D.; Tyagi, S. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982, 1117.
(25) Kahn, O. Molecular Magnetism; VCH: New York, 1993; p 252.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2006 567