Diels−Alder Reactions of N-Sulfonyl-1-aza-1,3-butadienes
A R T I C L E S
Table 1. Results of Survey of Optically Active Enol Ethers
ratio of diastereomersb
time major adduct
total
endo facial
endo:exo selectivity
dienophile
(h) (% conversion)a conv (%) endo
exo
2a
3a
4a
5a
6a
7a
8a
9a
10a
11a
12a
13a
14a
15a
16a
17a
18a
19a
60
60
60
60
72
60
60
60
60
48
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
48
2b (52)c
3b (72)
4b (49)
5b (63)
6b (48)
7b (71)
8b (53)
9b (71)
10b (85)
11b (12)c
12b (41)
13b (55)
14b (12)
15b (27)
16b (32)
17b (54)d
18b (59)d
19b (96)d
(82)e
97 54:40
94 77:19
63 78:18
80 79:14
64 75:14
91 78:18
69 77:15
88 81:19
98 86:10
31 37:18
55 75:25
86 62:19
18 69:31
45 83:9
38 85:9
68 80:14
65 91:5
g98 96:2
-
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
3:3
4:-
4:-
7:-
11:-
4:-
8:-
16:1
19:1
24:1
13:1
8:1
1.4:1
4:1
4:1
6:1
5:1
4:1
5:1
4:1
9:1
2:1
3:1
3:1
2:1
11:1
9:1
6:1
18:1
48:1
-
24:1
12:1
-:- >25:1
4:-
29:16
24:1
1:1
-:- >25:1
13:6 4:1
-:- >25:1
8:-
6:-
6:-
4:-
2:-
12:1
16:1
16:1
24:1
49:1
Figure 5. Dienophile series 3-9.
of the superb endo diastereoselectivity (8:1 vs 19:1). Replacing
the aryl ring with a saturated alkyl group (2a) or a larger
naphthyl ring (9a) did not significantly impact the endo
diastereoselection, and the latter did not improve the cycload-
dition facial selectivity. Within this series, the amount of the
major diastereomer approached the respectable level of 80% of
the product for each of the dienophiles, with the enhanced facial
selectivity of the larger alkyl derivatives being offset by a larger
proportion of exo adduct(s). As such, and because of their
enhanced rates of reactions, 3a and 9a emerge as the most useful
dienophiles in this series (Figure 5).
:
-
ethyl vinyl 46
ether
>25:1
a Reactions performed at room temperature, 0.3 M with respect to diene
in toluene. Major adduct % conversion based on integration of major product
C2-H versus minor diastereomer C2-H’s and diene C2-H. Some
hydrolysis of diene ocassionally observed (<5%). b Ratios based on 1H
NMR integration of C2-H of products unless otherwise noted. Endo and
exo compounds assigned on the basis of 1H NMR splitting patterns. Some
peaks could not be located due to overlap, small size, or low conversion.
c Integration based on C5-H. d Anhydrous CHCl3 as solvent, 1 M with
respect to diene. e Yield from ref 1c.
Several enol ethers, 10-13a, bearing chiral six-membered
rings were examined, inspired by the work of Denmark and
Swindell (10-12a)19-21 or Posner (13a).8 Whereas the most
hindered of these (11a and 12a) exhibited poor reactivities, poor
endo diastereoselectivities (12a) and/or modest to poor facial
selectivities, 13a and especially 10a exhibited good chemical
reactivity (% conversions), outstanding (10a, 24:1) or modest
(13a, 4:1) endo diastereoselectivity, and good (10a, 9:1) or
modest (13a, 3:1) facial selectivity. Of these, the dienophile
10a proved most satisfactory, providing conversions that slightly
exceed 85% for the major diastereomer in a reaction that
provides superb conversions (98%) with exceptional endo
diastereoselectivity (24:1) and excellent facial selectivity (9:1)
(Figure 6).
1
Figure 4. Diagnostic cycloadduct H NMR signals.
The study of the most interesting and useful series, 14-19,
began with an examination of enol ethers derived from
R-hydroxy esters and lactones, inspired by the studies of
Dujardin.9 Thus, the mandelate-derived enol ether 14a, analo-
the minor exo adduct was observed as a dt (5.32 ppm, J ) 1.8,
8.3 Hz), and both the structure and the relative and absolute
stereochemistries of the major product were established by a
single-crystal X-ray structure determination.18 The diagnostic
(8) Posner, G. H.; Wettlaufer, D. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 667.
(9) (a) Dujardin, G.; Rossignol, S.; Brown, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4007.
(b) Dujardin, G.; Rossignol, S.; Brown, E. Synthesis 1998, 763. (c) Gong,
J.; Bonfand, E.; Brown, E.; Dujardin, G.; Michelet, V.; Geneˆt, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2141. (d) Gaulon, C.; Dhal, R.; Chapin, T.;
Maisonneuve, V.; Dujardin, G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4338.
(10) Gizecki, P.; Dhal, R.; Poulard, C.; Gosselin, P.; Dujardin, G. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 37, 4007.
(11) Review: Denmark, S. E.; Thorarensen, A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 137.
(12) Pettus, T. R. R.; Selenski, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9196.
(13) Watanabe, W. H.; Conlon, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 2828.
(14) Tan, D. S.; Schreiber, S. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9509.
(15) Dujardin, G.; Rossignol, S.; Brown, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1653.
(16) Okimoto, Y.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1590.
(17) Bosch, M.; Schlaf, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5225.
(18) Atomic coordinates for the major cycloadducts derived from the reaction
of 1 with 3a (3b, CCDC286828), 6a (6b, CCDC286829), 12a (12b,
CCDC286826), 17a (17b, CCDC286830), and 19a (19b, CCDC286827,
(S)-enantiomer) and for the major cycloadduct from the reaction of 21a
with 19a (21b, CCDC287011, (S)-enantiomer) have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center.
(19) Denmark, S. E.; Schnute, M. E. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6738.
(20) Denmark, S. E.; Thorarensen, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6727.
(21) Swindell, C. S.; Tao, M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5889.
1
C5-H coupling in the H NMR spectra arises from the well-
defined conformations of the endo (diaxial substituents) versus
exo (axial -OR*, equatorial -CO2Et) cycloadducts and the
resulting C5-H/C4-H coupling constants of ca. 5 Hz (C4-
Heq) versus ca. 2 Hz (C4-Hax). In an analogous fashion, the
structures of the major products derived from 3 and 6 (repre-
sentative of 2-9), 12, and 17 and 19 (representative of 14-
19) were established by X-ray.18
Clear trends emerged in the examination of the series 2-9a,
inspired by the Posner studies, where the role of the aryl ring
was probed with 2 versus 3 and the size of the dienophile alkyl
substituent was systematically increased with 3-6. As the size
of the alkyl group was increased (3af6a), the facial selectivity
of the cycloaddition increased modestly (6:1 vs 4:1), but it did
so at the expense of the rate of the reaction and with an erosion
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 8, 2006 2589