P.S. de Carvalho, et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 2489e2493
2493
15000 g at 4 ꢁC. The supernatant of each sample was used for
determination of PGE2 by EIA using a PGE2 kit.
17500
15000
12500
10000
7500
5000
2500
0
4.2.5. Assay of in vitro NO release
Solutions of test agents (compound 6, native diclofenac and
NOR-3) were prepared in DMSO and 10
mL was added to 1 mL of
50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in presence of
L
-cysteiꢀn4e (5 mM),
for 1 h, at 37 ꢁC. The final drug concentration was 10 M. Each
sample was used for determination of nitrite content using
a Nitrate/Nitrite Colorimetric Assay kit.
**
**
DC
4.2.6. Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as the mean ꢂ S.E.M. Comparisons among
groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance fol-
lowed by the Student's t test or Dunnett multiple comparisons test,
when convenient. An associated probability (p value) of less than
5% was considered significant.
vehicle
compound 6
Fig. 6. Effects of orally administered diclofenac (50 mg kgꢀ1
) and Compound 6
(equivalent molar dose) on gastric mucosal prostaglandin E2 contents in rat stomachs.
Data are mean ꢂ S.E.M of 5 animals. **p < 0.01 when compared with group treated
with DMSO (0.1%).
References
4.2.2. Animals
Male Wistar rats (180e200 g) free of specific pathogens were
obtained from CEMIB (State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP,
Brazil). The experiments were performed in accordance with the
principles outlined by the Brazilian College for Animal Experi-
mentation (COBEA).
[1] J.R. Vane, R.M. Botting, Inflamm. Res. 47 (1998) S78eS87.
[2] F. Halter, A.S. Tarnawski, A. Schmassmann, B.M. Peskar, Gut 49 (2001)
443e453.
[3] R.S. Bresalier, R.S. Sandler, H. Quan, J.A. Bolognese, B. Oxenius, K. Horgan,
C. Lines, R. Riddell, D. Morton, A. Lanas, M.A. Konstam, J.A. Baron, Engl. J. Med.
352 (2005) 1092e1102.
[4] S. Fiorucci, Trends Immunol. 22 (2001) 232e235.
[5] J.L. Wallace, S.R. Zamuner, W. McKnight, M. Dicay, A. Mencarelli, P. del Soldato,
S. Fiorucci, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver. Physiol. 286 (2004) G76eG81.
[6] P.G. Wang, M. Xian, X. Tang, X. Wu, Z. Wen, T. Cai, A.J. Janczuk, Chem. Rev. 102
(2002) 1091e1134.
[7] A. Gasco, R. Fruttero, G. Sorba, A. Di Stilo, R. Calvino, Pure Appl. Chem. 76
(2004) 973e981.
[8] H. Cerecetto, W. Porcal, Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 5 (2005) 57e71.
[9] C. Medana, A. Di Stilo, S. Visentin, R. Fruttero, A. Gasco, D. Ghigo, A. Bosia,
Pharm. Res. 16 (1999) 956e960.
[10] J. Ackrell, M. Altaf-ur-Rahman, A.J. Boulton, R.C. Brown, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 (1972) 1587e1594.
[11] W. Stadlbauer, W. Fiala, M. Fischer, G. Hojas, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 37 (2000)
1253e1256.
[12] F.B. Mallory, in: N. Rabjohn (Ed.), Organic Syntheses, vol. 4, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1963, pp. 74e78, Coll.
[13] R.J. Gaughran, J.P. Picard, J.V.R. Kaufman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (1954)
2233e2236.
[14] K.H. Pausacker, J. Chem. Soc. (1953) 1989e1990.
[15] A. Gasco, A.J. Boulton, in: A.R. Katritzky, A.J. Boulton (Eds.), Advances in
Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 29, Academic Press, New York, 1981, 251e340.
[16] K. Takeuchi, H. Mizoguchi, H. Araki, Y. Komoike, K. Suzuki, Dig. Dis. Sci. 46
(2001) 1805e1818.
4.2.3. Carrageenan-induced paw edema model
Initially, the animals received the anti-inflammatory
compounds or vehicle intraperitoneally (i.p.). Thirty minutes later,
the animals were anaesthetized with halothane (inhaled). A sub-
plantar injection of carrageenan (1 mg/paw) in 0.1 mL of saline was
made into one paw of the rat. The contralateral paw received only
0.1 mL of saline. The paw volume was assessed immediately before
the carrageenan injection and was considered as the basal
measurement, and thereafter at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h, using a hydro-
plethysmometer (model 7150, Ugo Basile). The results are
expressed as the increase in paw volume (mL) calculated by sub-
tracting the basal volume. The area under the time-course curve
(AUC0e2h) was also calculated using the trapezoidal rule and the
results expressed as total edema volume (mL h) by comparison
with the vehicle rats [23].
4.2.4. Evaluation of gastric ulcerogenic activity and mucosal
prostaglandin E2 content
[17] Y. Kita, Y. Hirasawa, K. Maeda, M. Nishio, K. Yoshida, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 257
(1994) 123e130.
[18] A.I. Vogel, B.S. Furniss, A.J. Hannaford, P.W.G. Smith, A.R. Tatchell, Vogel's
Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, fifth ed. Longman Scientific & Tech-
nical, Harlow, 1989, pp. 395e413.
[19] W.C. Still, M. Kahn, A. Mitra, J. Org. Chem. 43 (1978) 2923e2925.
[20] A.G. Green, F.M. Rowe, J. Chem. Soc. 103 (1913) 897e901.
[21] A.M. Gasco, G. Ermondi, R. Fruttero, A. Gasco, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 31 (1996)
3e10.
[22] P. Patrignani, M.R. Panara, M.G. Sciulli, G. Santini, G. Renda, C. Patrono,
J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 48 (1997) 623e631.
[23] S.K. Costa, L.C. Esquisatto, E. Camargo, A. Gambero, S.D. Brain, G. De Nucci,
E. Antunes, Life Sci. 69 (2001) 1573e1585.
The animals were orally treated with vehicle (1 mL of DMSO) or
the anti-inflammatory compounds. After 4 h, the animals were
killed and their stomachs were removed and opened along the
greater curvature. The ulcerative lesion index of each animal was
calculated by adding the following values [24]: loss of normal
morphology (1 point), discoloration of mucosa (1 point), hemor-
rhages (1 point), petechial points (1e3 points), ulcers up to 1 mm
(n ꢃ 2 points), ulcers > 1 mm (n ꢃ 3 points). The stomachs were
then weighed and put in a tube with phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and
minced with scissors, homogenized and centrifuged for 10 min at
[24] M.T. Gamberini, L.A. Skorupa, C. Souccar, A.J. Lapa, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 86
(1991) 137e139.