Scheme 1. Syntheses of R-Me-nor-Lan (2S,2′R)-4 and (2R,2′R)-4 as Hydrochloride Derivativesa
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) DBU, DMF, 50 °C, 1 h; (ii) 2 N HCl/CH2Cl2 (1:1), 25 °C, 10 h. (b) (i) LiOH‚H2O, MeOH/H2O (3:2),
25 °C, 24 h; (ii) 12 N HCl, reflux, 12 h.
conformational constraints. The syntheses of lanthionine
(Lan) and methyllanthionine (Me-Lan) monomers for use
in peptide synthesis are nontrivial because of the requirement
of orthogonal protection of the two amine groups and the
two carboxylic acid functions. Despite this, however, several
synthetic approaches to these compounds have been de-
scribed in recent years.2,4 Nevertheless, the synthesis of the
isomer norlanthionine (nor-Lan), which consists of an alanyl
and a â-alanyl residue (Figure 1), has to the best of our
knowledge only been reported by the group of Tabor,5 and
this was incorporated into a cyclic peptide analogue of the
ring C of lantibiotic nisin.6
In this sense, the development of a new and efficient
synthesis of norlanthionine derivatives seems to be of interest.
As part of our ongoing program aimed at the synthesis of
restricted peptides, we decided to pursue approaches to
R-methylnorlanthionines because of their potential biological
importance.
reported. The opening reaction of the starting sulfamidate
at the quaternary carbon center with the thiol group of a
suitably protected cysteine derivative is the key step in the
synthetic pathway.
Initially, and taking into account the excellent results
obtained in the opening reaction of the easily accessible chiral
building block (R)-1 with nucleophiles,7 particularly with
sulfur nucleophiles,8 we performed the SN2 reaction with
commercial N-Boc-L-cysteine methyl ester (R)-2 using DBU
as a base and DMF as a solvent at 50 °C for 1 h, followed
by acid hydrolysis of the sulfamic acid intermediate.
Purification of the crude product by column chromatography
gave the corresponding protected R-Me-nor-Lan 3 in excel-
lent yield (98%) with a dr > 20:19 (Scheme 1).
Bearing in mind that the protecting groups on derivative
3 are not suitable for peptide synthesis, we used this
compound to obtain the free R-Me-nor-Lan 4. Weinreb
amide hydrolysis of 3 with LiOH, followed by acid hydroly-
sis with 12 N HCl under reflux gave (2S,2′R)-R-Me-nor-
Lan 4 as the hydrochloride derivative. The other diastereo-
isomer was obtained by the same sequence of reactions but
starting from the chiral building block (S)-1 and giving the
protected (2R,2′R)-R-Me-nor-Lan 3, which was hydrolyzed
to (2R,2′R)-R-Me-nor-Lan 4 (Scheme 1).
We wish to report here new and efficient syntheses of
(2S,2′R)- and (2R,2′R)-R-methylnorlanthionine (R-Me-nor-
Lan) in diastereomerically pure form starting from the
corresponding cyclic R-methylisoserine-derived sulfamidate
as a chiral building block. The preparation of the orthogonally
protected derivatives of the target compounds is also
Given that an orthogonal protecting group plan will be
required for the future regioselective manipulation of these
important diastereomerically pure core residues, R-Me-nor-
Lan, we considered changing the protecting groups on the
starting materials: the chiral sulfamidate-derived building
blocks and the cysteine derivatives.
(3) (a) Yu, L.; Lai, Y.; Wade, J. V.; Coutts, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6633. (b) Feng, Y.; Pattarawarapan, M.; Wang, Z.; Burgess, K.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 121. (c) Rew, Y.; Malkmus, S.; Svensson, C.; Yaksh,
T. L.; Chung, N. N.; Schiller, P. W.; Cassel, J. A.; DeHaven, R. N.;
Goodman, M. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3746. (d) Mustapa, M. F. M.; Harris,
R.; Mould, J.; Chubb, N. A. L.; Schultz, D.; Driscoll, P. C.; Tabor, A. B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8363. (e) Smith, N. D.; Goodman, M. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 1035.
(4) Some examples: (a) Narayan, R. S.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 2655. (b) Swali, V.; Matteucci, M.; Elliot, R.; Bradley, M.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9101. (c) Zhu, X.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 4069. (d) Shao, H.; Wang, S. H.; Lee, C.; O¨ sapay, G.; Goodman, M.
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2956.
(5) (a) Mustapa, M. F. M.; Harris, R.; Mould, J.; Chubb, N. A. L.;
Schultz, D.; Driscoll, P. C.; Tabor, A. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8363.
(b) Mustapa, M. F. M.; Harris, R.; Bulic-Subanovic, N.; Elliott, S. L.;
Bregant, S.; Groussier, M. F. A.; Mould, J.; Schultz, D.; Chubb, N. A. L.;
Gaffney, P. R. J.; Driscoll, P. C.; Tabor, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
8185.
To this end, the amide and carbamate groups of sulfami-
date (R)-1 were hydrolyzed to give sulfamidate (R)-5. The
(7) (a) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Corzana, F.; Jime´nez-Ose´s, G.;
Peregrina, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 980. (b) Building block (R)-1 was
obtained in two steps from the Weinreb amide of methacrylic acid with an
overall yield of 78%.
(8) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Jime´nez-Ose´s, G.; Peregrina, J. M. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 1692.
(9) The diastereomeric purity of opening products (2R,2′R)-3, (2S,2′R)-
3, (2S,2′R)-20, and (2R,2′R)-20 was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy,
and a sole stereoisomer was detected: dr > 20:1.
(6) Mustapa, M. F. M.; Harris, R.; Esposito, D.; Chubb, N. A. L.; Mould,
J.; Schultz, D.; Driscoll, P. C.; Tabor, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8193.
2856
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 13, 2006