D- and
L
-glycero-
â
-D-manno-Heptopyranosides
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1. 4,6-O-[1-Cyano-2-(2-iodophenyl)ethylidene]
Benzylidene Radical Fragmentation
Figure 1. Repeating unit of the O-specific polysaccharide from CNCTC
113/92 LPS (serotype 54).
composed of a novel hexasaccharide repeating unit (Figure 1)
containing two unusual â-linked heptose units, one of which is
6-deoxy.
These unique structural features of the repeating unit prompted
our investigation of stereocontrolled â-glycosylation of the D,D-
and L,D-heptoses. The synthetic challenge was heightened by
the presence of the 6-deoxy-glycero-â-D-manno-hepto-
pyranoside. To design a concise synthesis of the hexasaccharide
repeating unit, we needed to address two issues: (i) stereo-
selective â-glycosydation in D,D- and L,D-heptoses and (ii)
efficient generation of the 6-deoxy-â-Hepp unit with full
regiocontrol at the 6-position and stereocontrol at the anomeric
position. The first problem is conceptually similar to that of
stereocontrolled â-mannosylation, for which we developed a
powerful method using 4,6-O-benzylidene-blocked thiomanno-
sides,8a,b and/or their sulfoxides.8c Our interest in these molecules
was further spurred by the insight that might be gained into the
underlying reasons for the beneficial influence of the 4,6-O-
benzylidene acetal on the stereocontrolled preparation of â-man-
nosides. Originally, working in the gluco-series, Fraser-Reid and
co-workers suggested that trans-fused 4,6-O-benzylidene pro-
tecting groups restrict the flexibility of the pyranose ring,
resulting in an oxacarbenium ion intermediate with a computed
(PM3) 20° twist in the ideally syn-coplanar C5-O5-C1-C2
system.9 In a subsequent paper, differential solvation was also
computed to be of significance in these so-called torsional
disarming effects.10 More recently, Bols and co-workers pro-
vided experimental evidence in support of the notion that the
disarming effect of the 4,6-O-acetal group is mainly due to the
locking of the C5-C6 bond in the deactivating tg-conforma-
tion.11 We hypothesized that the inclusion of either an extra
axial C6 substituent, as in the 4,6-O-benzylidene-protected
L-glycero-D-manno-heptoses, or a corresponding equatorial
substituent, as in the D-glycero-D-manno series, would influence
both torsional and solvation considerations differently, whereas
the tg conformation of the C5-C6 bond would be unchanged.
Comparisons of either reactivity or stereoselectivity between
the two diastereomeric series might therefore differentiate
between the two rationales for the 4,6-O-benzylidene group
effect.
derivatives at the 6-position, which is best achieved after
glycosylation so as to take advantage of the directing effect of
a 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal-type protecting group.12 In view of
the susceptibility of benzyl ethers to hydrogen atom abstraction,
neither the Hanessian-Hullar13 reaction nor the related Roberts’
protocol14 for the cleavage of benzylidene acetals are applicable
to the type of complex oligosaccharide synthesis envisaged. With
this problem in mind, we initially developed the 4,6-O-[R-(2-
(2-iodophenyl)ethylthiocarbonyl)benzylidene] group as a sur-
rogate for the 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal15a and applied it in the
total synthesis of the LPS E. hermanii ATCC 33650/33652.15b
However, this method suffers from two limitations: the lengthy
synthesis of the thiol and the transesterification reaction, required
to introduce the thiol ester, which reduces functional group
compatibility. An improved second-generation system, the
1-cyano-2-(2-iodophenyl)ethylidene group, was developed and
employed successfully in the synthesis of â-D-rhamno-pyrano-
sides (Scheme 1).16 This new 4,6-O-benzylidene surrogate can
be easily prepared and introduced under mild conditions.
Moreover, it is compatible with a wide variety of protecting
groups. However, one question remained in the application of
this second-generation system to the synthesis of the 6-deoxy-
â-Hepp unit, namely the regioselectivity of the radical frag-
mentation, which might potentially give either a 4- or a 6-deoxy
system. Nevertheless, based on the understanding of the radical
(12) (a) Crich, D.; Picione, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 781. (b) Crich, D.; Vinod, A.
U. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8453. (c) Crich, D.; Hutton, T.; Banerjee, A.;
Jayalath, P.; Picione, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 70, 8064.
(13) (a) Hanessian, S.; Plessas, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 1035. (b)
Hanessian, S.; Plessas, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 1045. (c) Hanessian,
S.; Plessas, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 1053. (d) Chana, J. S.; Collins,
P. M.; Farnia, F.; Peacock, D. J. J. Chem. Soc Chem. Commun. 1988, 2,
94. (e) Binkley, R. W.; Goewey, G. S.; Johnston, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1984,
49, 992. (f) Hanessian, S. Org. Synth. 1987, 65, 243. (g) Hullar, T. L.;
Siskin, S. B. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 225. (h) Hanessian, S. AdV. Chem.
Ser. 1968, 74, 159. (i) Szarek, W. A. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
1973, 28, 225. (j) Paulsen, H. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1971, 26,
127. (k) Gelas, J. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1981, 39, 71.
(14) (a) Roberts, B. P.; Smits, T. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3663. (b)
Roberts, B. P.; Smits, T. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 137. (c) Dang,
H.-S.; Roberts, B. P.; Sekhon, J.; Smits, T. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003,
1, 1330. (d) Fiedling, A. J.; Franchi, P.; Roberts, B. P.; Smits, T. M. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 155. (e) Cai, Y.; Dang, H.-S.; Roberts,
B. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2449. (f) Jeppesen, L. M.; Lundt,
I.; Pedersen, C. Acta Chem. Scand. 1973, 27, 3579.
The second issue perhaps is more intriguing and is analogous
to the problems associated with the synthesis of â-D-rhamno-
pyranosides. The problem of the â-D-rhamno-pyranosides
reduces to one of the regioselective deoxygenation of D-mannose
(7) (a) Niedziela, T.; Lukasiewicz, J.; Jachymek, W.; Dzieciatkowska, M.;
Lugowski, C.; Kenne, L. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 11653. (b) Czaja, J.;
Jachymek, W.; Niedziela, T.; Lugowski, C.; Aldova, E.; Kenne, L. Eur. J.
Biochem. 2000, 267, 1672.
(8) (a) Crich, D.; Smith, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015. (b) Crich,
D.; Lim, L. B. L. Org. React. 2004, 64, 115. (c) Crich, D.; Sun, S.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8321.
(9) Fraser-Reid, B.; Wu, Z.; Andrews, C. W.; Skowronski, E.; Bowen, J. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1434.
(10) Andrews, C. W.; Rodebaugh, R.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
5280.
(15) (a) Crich, D.; Yao, Q. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2189. (b) Crich, D.; Yao, Q. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8232.
(16) Crich, D.; Bowers, A. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3452.
(11) Jensen, H. H.; Nordstrøm, L. U.; Bols, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
9205.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 24, 2006 8079