K. Yu. Koltunov / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 3891–3894
3893
+
+
The resulting mixture was extracted with ether. The
organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and con-
centrated in vacuo to obtain the crude product, which was
purified by silica gel column chromatography with ben-
zene–acetone (5:1) to give product 7a (1.37 g, 92%). Mp
173–174 °C (EtOH). HRMS C16H14O2 calcd 238.0994,
+
O
X
O
X
O
X
H
X
+
+
+
H
H
O
O
HO
+
+
X
8'
9
8
+
+
1
O
X
O
X
found 238.0989. H NMR (250.13 MHz, CDCl3) d 2.16–
+
H
+
H
HO
O
5
2.35 (m, 1H), 2.45–2.7 (m, 3H), 4.5–4.6 (m, 1H), 7.03
(d,J 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.2 (m, 2H), 7.2–7.34 (m, 4H),
7.77 (d,J 7.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3) d
31.0, 33.9, 38.4, 119.9, 121.2, 127.3, 128.17, 128.19, 129.0,
131.9, 134.4, 141.5, 153.5, 198.5.
+
+
X
10
10'
_
3n
X = H or Al Br
n
Scheme 4. Proposed key intermediates.
Acknowledgments
intermediates (Scheme 4). A catalytic amount of protic
superacid (HBr–AlnBr3n or H2O–AlnBr3n) which is
required for C-protonation of intermediate species 9 and
5 is normally present in such reaction media due to traces
of water in the starting materials. So, additional saturation
of the reaction mixture with gaseous HBr, which usually
accelerates similar reactions,14 is not needed. Also, careful
protection from atmospheric moisture is not necessary.
It should also be noted that a 3.5-fold molar excess of
AlBr3 is not essential and a decrease in the loading is pos-
sible. This, however, slows down the reaction. Moreover,
the use of less than a ꢁ2.5-fold molar excess of AlBr3 does
not bring about the reaction. Attempts to replace AlBr3 by
AlCl3 were not generally successful as the reactions pro-
ceeded too slowly at room temperature. For example, reac-
tion 6e?7e in the presence of a 3.5-fold molar excess of
AlCl3 proceeded with about 50% conversion in 24 h. This
is probably due to the lack of solubility of the complexes
of diols 6a–e with AlCl3 in benzene. On the other hand,
heating (up to 80 °C) in order to overcome this solubility
problem gave rise to side reactions, which considerably
decreased the yields of 7a–e.
The students of Novosibirsk State University: Kachaylo
K.M., Kovtonyuk L.V., Jechev D.A. and Derevyanko
A.G. are gratefully acknowledged for their contribution
in the experimental work.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. (a) Williams, M.; Quallich, G. Chem. Ind. 1990, 10, 315; (b) Meyer,
M. D.; Hancock, A. A.; Tietje, K.; Sippy, K. B.; Prasad, R.; Stout, D.;
Arendsen, D. L.; Donner, B. G.; Carroll, W. A. J. Med. Chem. 1997,
40, 1049; (c) Vukics, K.; Fodor, T.; Fischer, J.; Fellegvary, I.; Levai,
S. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 82.
2. See, for example: Kim, D. H.; Kim, K.; Chung, Y. K. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 8264. and references cited therein.
3. (a) Souvie, J.-C.; Blanco, I. G.; Thominot, G.; Chapuis, G.; Horvath,
S.; Damien G. U.S. Patent 7,250,531, July 31, 2007; (b) Descamps-
Franßcois, C.; Yous, S.; Chavatte, P.; Audinot, V.; Bonnaud, A.;
Boutin, J. A.; Delagrange, P.; Bennejean, C.; Renard, P.; Lesieur, D.
J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1127. and references cited therein.
4. (a) Methoden der Organischen Chemie; Thomas, H. G., Ed.; Thieme:
Stuttgart, 1976; Vol. 7, p 1710. 2b; (b) Repinskaya, I. B.; Koltunov,
K. Yu.; Shakirov, M. M.; Shchegoleva, L. N.; Koptyug, V. A. Russ.
J. Org. Chem. 1993, 29, 803; (c) Koltunov, K. Yu.; Repinskaya, I. B.;
Shakirov, M. M.; Shchegoleva, L. N.; Koptyug, V. A. Russ. J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 39, 88. and references cited therein.
5. (a) Koltunov, K. Yu.; Subbotina, E. N.; Repinskaya, I. B. Russ. J.
Org. Chem. 1997, 33, 689; (b) Koltunov, K. Yu.; Ostashevskaya, L.
A.; Repinskaya, I. B. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 34, 1796.
6. (a) Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 767; (b) Olah,
G. A.; Klumpp, D. A. Superelectrophiles and Their Chemistry; Wiley:
New York, 2008.
In conclusion, an additional approach to hydroxytetral-
ones is elaborated. The reaction procedures using readily
available naphthalenediols 6a–e are simple and reproduc-
ible. The regioselectivity of the reactions is in contrast
to that of a close derivative, 5-amino-1-naphthol. The
mechanism of these reactions is interpreted in terms of
key superelectrophilic intermediates 8 and 10, analogous
to C,C-diprotonated dications 1 and 2. A study on similar
condensations of 6a–e with various derivatives of benzene
is underway. In addition, their reactivity toward benzene
and cyclohexane in the presence of H-form zeolites instead
of superacids is under investigation.15
3. Typical procedure
7. (a) Repinskaya, I. B.; Shakirov, M. M.; Koltunov, K. Yu.; Koptyug,
V. A. J. Org. Chem. USSR 1988, 24, 1719; (b) Repinskaya, I. B.;
Koltunov, K. Yu.; Shakirov, M. M.; Koptyug, V. A. J. Org. Chem.
USSR 1992, 28, 785.
3.1. 5-Hydroxy-4-phenyl-1-tetralone ð7aÞ
8. Ostashevskaya, L. A.; Koltunov, K. Yu.; Repinskaya, I. B. Russ. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 36, 1474.
9. Koltunov, K. Yu.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Rasul, G.; Olah, G. A.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5423.
To a solution of AlBr3 (6 g, 22.5 mmol) in benzene
(15 mL) was added 6a (1 g, 6.25 mmol). The resulting solu-
tion was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h, and then poured onto ice.