1
they were measured from 1H NMR spectroscopy. In all cases
the identifications of the cis and trans isomers were consistent
with previous work.4 Variation in reaction temperature had no
predictable effect on yield or diastereoselectivity.
=
Table 1 Reaction of imines R CH NR with alkynylcyclopropane di-
cobalt complex 1
Product R1
R
T/◦C Yielda (%) trans:cis
In order to access the metal-free heterocycle, we have looked
briefly at the removal of the cobalt unit. As illustrated in Scheme 4,
reaction of one of the cycloaddition products 5c with ceric
ammonium nitrate (Et3N, acetone) cleanly oxidises the metal in
acceptable yield to afford the free alkynyl pyrrolidine 6 (60%; 1 : 1
trans : cis). This procedure could also be used in the work-up of the
cycloaddition reaction to allow access to the metal-free pyrrolidine
products in a two-step, one pot procedure.
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
CO2Et
4-MeOC6H4
0
25
40
0
25
40
0
25
40
0
25
40
25
40
91
75
91
85
73
80
79
81
85
65
72
69
23
30
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
2:1
2:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:2
1:3
1:3
2:1
2:1
CO2Et
CO2Et
CO2Et
2,4-(MeO)2C6H3
4-MeC6H4
2-NCC6H4
2-O2NC6H4 C6H5
a Reaction time 10 h.
by standard condensation chemistry, treating the amine with
the aldehyde in diethyl ether at 25 ◦C over molecular sieves for
18 h. The imines were then used directly in the cycloaddition
with dicobalt complex 1 to produce pyrrolidines 5 (Scheme 3).
Optimisation studies revealed BF3·OEt2 as the Lewis acid of choice
from those investigated, and that at least two equivalents of Lewis
acid were required to produce pyrrolidines 5a–e in good yield
(Table 1) and to minimise the formation of the lactone 2, just as
we had observed earlier in the tetrahydrofuran synthesis.
Scheme 4 Reagents: (i) (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6, Et3N, Me2CO.
We have thus demonstrated a novel formal cycloaddition to
produce functionalised pyrrolidines via a CCC/CN strategy. Work
is continuing with the alkynyl cyclopropane complex 1 to further
explore its utility in ring-forming reactions. We acknowledge the
support of the EPSRC (studentship to R. J. D.).
Notes and references
1 J. Tsuji, I. Shimizu and Y. Ohashi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 3825–
3828.
2 K. Yamamoto, T. Ishida and J. Tsuji, Chem. Lett., 1987, 1157–
1158.
1
=
Scheme 3 Reagents: (i) R CH NR, BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2.
3 S. M. Ma and N. Jiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 4737–4740.
4 S. D. R. Christie, R. J. Davoile, M. R. J. Elsegood, R. Fryatt, R. C. F.
Jones and G. J. Pritchard, Chem. Commun., 2004, 2474–2475.
5 K. M. Nicholas and R. Pettit, Tetrahedron Lett., 1971, 12, 3474–3477.
6 For related studies with nitrone dipolarophiles (‘homo[3 + 2]dipolar
cycloaddition’), see: T. P. Lebold, C. A. Carson and M. A. Kerr, Synlett,
2006, 364–368, and references. therein.
7 See for example: L. M. Harwood and R. J. Vickers, in Synthetic Applica-
tions of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry Toward Heterocycles and
Natural Products, ed. A. Padwa and W. H. Pearson, Wiley-Interscience,
Hoboken, 2003, pp. 169–252.
In general, yields were good to excellent when an electron-
withdrawing group was present on the imine carbon and an
electron-donating group was present on the nitrogen atom, for
example, in the preparation of 5a–c, where the imine was a
glyoxal derivative of aromatic amines carrying electron-donating
substituents. This would be consistent with ring-opening of the
vinyl cyclopropane to give the formal Nicholas cation/malonate
anion dipole; attack of the malonate nucleophile onto the imine
carbon atom is followed by cyclisation of the amide anion onto
the Nicholas carbocation.12
8 For the transformation of homo[3 + 2]dipolar cycloadducts (ref. 6) into
pyrrolidines, see: I. S. Young, J. L. Williams and M. A. Kerr, Org. Lett.,
2005, 7, 953–955.
Placing an ortho-substituted aryl group on either position gave
an increase in the 2,5-diastereoselectivity in the new pyrrolidine
ring. For pyrrolidine 5d, the ortho-nitrile group gave a maximum
of a 3 : 1 ratio in favour of the cis isomer. In contrast, having an
ortho-nitro group in the aryl group of the imine carbon substituent
gave a 2 : 1 ratio in favour of the trans isomer of pyrrolidine
5e, but in a reduced yield. It is unclear at this point whether
this is due to steric interactions. The diastereoselectivities were
measured directly when the isomers were separable, otherwise
9 See for example: S. D. R. Christie, R. J. Davoile and R. C. F. Jones,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 7167–7170, and references therein.
10 For recent reviews of the Nicholas reaction, see: B. J. Teobald,
Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 4133–4170; J. R. Green, Curr. Org. Chem., 2001,
5, 809–826.
11 For recent reviews of the chemistry of donor–acceptor cyclopropanes,
see: M. Yu and B. L. Pagenkopf, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 321–
347; H.-U. Reissig and R. Zimmer, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 1151–
1196.
12 For an alternative mechanistic speculation in the case of homo[3 +
2]dipolar cycloaddition, see ref. 6.
2684 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 2683–2684
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
©