Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
that of C2 (entries 6 and 7). The yield of the desired C(2)-
acylate 12 was low (13−22%) in both cases, while the
promising site-selectivity (79%) was observed in the reaction
with C3. We further examined a newly developed catalyst, C5
with a 3-benzothiophenyl group instead of the 3-indolyl group
of C2. Site-selective introduction of the galloly group at C(2)−
OH was achieved with C5 in 42% yield with 75% selectivity
(entry 8). Finally, use of 2.2 equiv of anhydride 10 in the
presence of C5 afforded the desired 2-O-acylate 12 with
moderately acceptable yield and selectivity (entry 9, 51% yield,
78% selectivity). The rationale of the C(2)−OH selectivity in
C5-catalyzed acylation was totally unclear at this moment.
With the desired 1,2,4-trigallate 12 in hand, 1,2,3,4,6-
pentagallate 15 (Scheme 2), the precursor for the key step
(step 4 in Scheme 1a: stereodivergent oxidative phenol
coupling), was prepared. Condensation of 12 with gallic acid
derivative 8′ (protected G2 in Scheme 1a) followed by
hydrogenolysis gave 15 in 72% yield. Construction of the 3,6-
HHDP bridge by oxidative phenol coupling of 15 via the
presumed ring-flip process of the pyranose core was examined.
Treatment of 15 under the standard conditions for oxidative
phenol coupling (CuCl2 (3.0 equiv)/n-BuNH2 (20 equiv)/
CHCl3/MeOH (1/1))8,17 gave no HHDP-bridged products;
instead, decomposition of 15 by solvolysis and/or aminolysis
was observed (Table S1, entry 1). We then examined sparteine
in place of n-BuNH2 according to Quideau’s achievement.
Recently, Quideau, Deffieux, and co-workers reported
(−)-sparteine/Cu(II)-mediated oxidative phenol coupling for
the construction of a nonahydroxytriphenoyl (NHTP) group
toward total synthesis of a C-glucoside ellagitannin, (−)-vesca-
lin.18 Treatment of 15 with CuCl2 (3.0 equiv) and
(+)-sparteine (10 equiv) in CHCl3/MeOH (1/1) at rt for
30 min afforded the desired 3,6-HHDP-bridged product 16
with R configuration in 60% yield as a single diastereomer
(Scheme 2). Use of smaller amounts (5.0 equiv) of
(+)-sparteine resulted in the reduced yield (29%) with
complete stereocontrol of the HHDP group formation
(Table S1, entry 7). The 1C4 conformation of 16 was
Table 1. Catalyst Screening for the C(2)−OH-Selective
Introduction of the Third Galloyl Group into 1,4-Digallate
11
recovery
(%)
site-selectivity (%) for
yield (%)
13 14
C(2)−OH acylation
entry catalyst
12
11
12/(12 + 13 + 14)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DMAP
C1
C2
ent-C1
ent-C2
C3
C4
C5
C5
44
32
23
37
21
22
13
42
51
36
20
9
37
19
5
7
10
13
0
4
1
3
3
1
4
4
1
10
24
48
13
36
49
37
30
10
55
57
70
48
49
79
54
75
78
a
a
Acid anhydride 10 (2.2 equiv) and DIPEA (3.0 equiv) were used.
3
suggested by comparison of the chemical shifts and JHH of
1
the pyranose moiety in the H NMR spectra of 16 with those
for the oxidative phenol coupling of 15 resulted in complete
reversal of stereochemistry for the construction of the 3,6-
HHDP group. On treatment of 15 with CuCl2 (3.0 equiv) and
(−)-sparteine (10 equiv) in CHCl3/MeOH (1/1) at rt for 30
min, the desired product 17 with an (S)-3,6-HHDP group was
obtained in 26% yield as a single diastereomer. The recovery of
15 was only ∼10% in this transformation. The major reason of
the poor material balance seemed to be resulting from
solvolysis and aminolysis of 17 and/or the related derivatives.
Although the yields are not satisfactory, this is the first
successful example of stereodivergent construction of the
HHDP groups from a common precursor among the reported
syntheses of ellagitannins.19 Deprotection of the MOM groups
of 16 and 17 under the hydrogenation conditions15,20 afforded
1 and 2 in 56 and 42% yield, respectively (cf. The MOM group
remained intact during the transformation of 12 to 15 via
hydrogenation conditions in THF. Use of alcoholic solvents is
indispensable for the removal of acid-labile groups under
hydrogenation conditions.15,20). Thus, the first total syntheses
of 1 and 2 were achieved in overall seven steps, respectively,
from D-glucose (nine steps from gallic acid) without using
protective groups for hydroxy groups of glucose. Two
hydrogen bond could be, at least in some part, responsible for
the reduced reactivity of the free C(6)−OH.
We then examined a catalyst mini-library including C1−C5,
ent-C1, and ent-C2, which were expected to be able to control
the site-selectivity of acylation of polyol compounds
irrespective of the inherent reactivity of the substrate polyols
(Table 1).16 Catalyst C1 was first examined because it was
shown to be extremely effective for site-selective acylation of D-
glucose derivatives.12c Treatment of 11 with anhydride 10 in
the presence of 10 mol % of C1 gave the desired 2-O-acylate
12 and 3-O-acylate 13 in 32 and 20% yield, respectively, with
24% recovery of 11 (57% site-selectivity for C(2)−OH
acylation, entry 2). Since the site-selectivity was not improved,
its diastereomeric catalysts C2, ent-C1, and ent-C2 were
examined (entries 2−4). The highest site-selectivity (70%) was
obtained by C2 with R,S,S,R configuration, although the yield
was low (23%, entry 2). We then examined catalysts C3 and
C4 possessing β-naphthylalanine- and valine-derived side
chains, respectively, with the same R,S,S,R configuration as
1431
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1428−1434