188
K.-W. Lei, W.-S. Liu / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 65 (2006) 187–190
MeOH at 25 ◦C. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar
360 FT-IR instrument using KBr discs in the 400–4000 cm−1
region. H NMR spectra were measured on a FT-80A or FT-
Analytical data, Calc. for L: C, 70.85; H, 8.45; N, 6.38. Found:
C, 70.56%; H, 8.65%; N, 6.33%.
1
2.3.4. 2,2ꢀ-[2,3-naphthylenebis(oxy)]-
200A spectrometer in CDC13 solution, with TMS as internal
standard. Fluorescence measurements were made on a Hitachi
F-4500 spectrophotometer equipped with quartz curettes of 1 cm
path length at room temperature. The excitation and emission
slit widths were 2.5 nm.
bis(N,N-dibutyl(acetamide)) (Lc)
Yield, 78%. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDC13): δ 7.26–7.68 (m,
6H); 4.85 (s, 4H; 2O–CH2–C(O)); 3.35 (t, 8H; 2N–(CH2–R)2);
1.52 (m, 8H; 2N–(R–CH2–R)2) 1.30 (m, 8H; 2N–(R–CH2–R)2)
0.92 (t, 12H; 4R–CH3) IR: ν 1646(C O), 1172 (Ar–O–C). Ana-
lytical data, Calc. for L: C, 72.35; H, 9.24; N, 5.68. Found: C,
72.25%; H, 9.30%; N, 5.62%.
2.3. Synthesis of the ligand
2.3.1. General procedure for ligand synthesis
The three ligands were prepared by the same procedure.
Anhydrous K2CO3 (4.0 g) was added slowly to the DMF
solution of 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene (1) (6.04 mmol) at
110 ◦C. An hour later, a DMF solution containing 2 (La: N,N-
diethylchloroacetamide; Lb: N,N-diisopropylchloroacetamide;
Lc: N,N-dibutylchloroacetamide) (13.0 mmol) was added
dropwise and slowly to the mixture. The reaction mixture was
stirred for 24 h. Fifty milliliters of water were poured into the
cooled mixture. Then the crude product was extracted by CHCl3
(3 × 40 ml). Thecombinedorganicphasesweredriedinvacuum.
The crude product was dissolved in EtOAc and then purified
by chromatography on silica gel until 3 was received as white
solid.
2.4. Synthesis of complexes
A solution of Eu(NO3)3·6H2O (0.1 mmol) in ethyl acetate
was added slowly to 20 ml of a solution of the ligand (0.1 mmol).
The mixture was stirred for 5 h and white precipitate formed.
The precipitate was collected and washed three times with ethyl
acetate. Further drying in vacuum resulted in a pale white pow-
der, yield: 80% Fig. 1.
3. Result and discussion
3.1. Properties of the complexes
Analytical data for the complexes are listed in Table 1, con-
formed to [Eu(NO3)3L]. All complexes are soluble in DMF,
DMSO, acetonitrile, THF, methanol and acetone, but little solu-
ble in chloroform and ethyl acetate. Conductivity measurement
for these complexes in methanol solution (Table 1) indicate the
presence of a non-dissociated compound [9].
2.3.2. 2,2ꢀ-[2,3-naphthylenebis(oxy)]-
bis(N,N-diethyl(acetamide)) (La)
Yield, 80%. 1H NMR spectrum (80 MHz, CDC13): δ
7.27–7.74 (m, 6H); 4.84 (s, 4H; 2O–CH2–C(O)); 3.41 (q, 8H;
4N–CH2–R), 1.20 (t, 12H; 4R–CH3). IR: ν 1640(C O), 1166
(Ar–O–C). Analytical data, Calc. for La: C, 66.30; H, 8.29; N,
7.73. Found: C, 66.10%; H, 9.21%; N, 7.20%.
3.2. IR spectra
2.3.3. 2,2ꢀ-[2,3-naphthylenebis(oxy)]-bis(N,N-
IR spectra of the complexes are similar to each other. The
main infrared bands of the ligands and their complexes are pre-
sented in Table 2. The IR spectrum of the free ligands show a
strong band in the region 1640–1661 cm−1, which can assigned
to the stretch vibration of the carbonyl group. The peak at
diisopropyl(acetamide)) (Lb)
Yield, 80%. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDC13): δ 7.29–7.69 (m,
6H); 4.75 (s, 4H; 2O–CH2–C(O)); 3.42 (q, 2H; 2N–CH(R)2);
1.40 (d, 12H; 2R–(CH2)2) IR: ν 1661(C O), 1174 (Ar–O–C).
Fig. 1. Scheme of the synthesis of the ligands.