C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Western blot analysis of lysates from Jurkat cells treated with
1, 2, 3, or buffer (no azido sugar). Jurkat lysates were reacted with a biotin-
alkyne probe in the presence (+) or absence (-) of CuSO4. The blot was
probed with an R-biotin antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) (upper panel), then stripped and re-probed with an R-actin antibody
as a protein loading control (lower panel).
the azide (9). Global deprotection and acetylation produced 2. All
three compounds were prepared in peracetylated form in order to
facilitate passive diffusion across cell membranes.3-5
Figure 4. HPAEC-PAD analysis of hydrolysates from Jurkat cells
incubated with (A) compound 3 or (B) Ac4Fuc. The peaks labeled 1 and 2
correspond to native fucose and 6-azido fucose, respectively, as determined
by analysis of authentic standards. Details are in the Supporting Information.
Compounds 1-3 were initially screened for metabolic incorpora-
tion into Jurkat glycans by flow cytometry. Briefly, the cells were
treated with 1-3 at concentrations of 10-200 µM for a period of
up to 3 days, then reacted by Staudinger ligation with a phosphine
reagent bearing the FLAG peptide.3-5 The cells were then labeled
with a FITC-conjugated R-FLAG antibody and analyzed by flow
cytometry. Significant fluorescence was only observed after treat-
ment with 3 at concentrations above 100 µM (Supporting Informa-
tion); compounds 1 and 2 did not appear to label cell surface glycans
at any concentration tested. Interestingly, we determined that the
observed signal resulted from cell death upon treatment with 3 at
concentrations above 100 µM, as determined by propidium iodide
staining (Supporting Information). By contrast, compounds 1 and
2 did not produce any adverse cellular effects at a concentration of
200 µM, suggesting that the toxicity of 3 is related to its cellular
metabolism.
labeling, but a contribution from glycolipids is also possible and
should be explored. Finally, the toxicity of compound 3 is a matter
of interest and also concern. The correlation of metabolic conversion
with toxicity suggests a specific mechanism involving either enzyme
inhibition or altered protein function as a result of the azido sugar
modification. These areas warrant further study in order to define
the full potential of compound 3 for profiling protein fucosylation
in living systems.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Cheryl McVaugh for a critical
reading of the manuscript, and Nick Agard for compound 4 and
the triazolyl ligand. This work was supported by a grant from the
NIH to C.R.B. (GM66047). S.C.H. is supported by an NSF
predoctoral fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, spectral
data for all compounds, experimental procedures for Western blots,
flow cytometry, and HPAEC-PAD. This material is available free of
To identify the nature of the azide-labeled Jurkat glycoconjugates,
we analyzed cell lysates by Western blot. Jurkat cells were cultured
with 125 µM 1, 2, or 3 for 72 h and then lysed with NP-40, a
detergent known to be compatible with click chemistry.15 The
lysates were reacted with biotin-alkyne derivative 4 using the
conditions for click chemistry suggested by Cravatt15 (Figure 2),
and the Western blot was probed with an R-biotin antibody-
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate. Significant glycoprotein
labeling was only observed in lysates from cells treated with 6-azido
fucose analogue 3 (Figure 3).
References
(1) Apweiler, R.; Hermjakob, H.; Sharon, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999,
1473, 4-8.
(2) Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 13-21.
(3) Dube, D. H.; Prescher, J. A.; Quang, C. N.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 4819-4824.
(4) Prescher, J. A.; Dube, D. H.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nature 2004, 430, 873-
877.
To provide direct evidence of the incorporation of 3 into Jurkat
glycoproteins, lysates from cells cultured with 3 or the control,
peracetylated fucose (Ac4Fuc), were subjected to mild acid hy-
drolysis. The hydrolysates were analyzed by high pH anion
exchange chromatography followed by pulsed amperometric detec-
tion (HPAEC-PAD).17 As shown in Figure 4, hydrolysates from
Jurkat cells treated with compound 3 contained 6-azido fucose (A),
whereas hydrolysates from Ac4Fuc-treated cells did not (B). Integra-
tion of the peaks corresponding to native fucose and 6-azido fucose
in Figure 4A suggested that the azido derivative replaced up to 40%
of fucose residues under these conditions (Supporting Information).
In conclusion, fucosylated glycoproteins can be labeled in human
cells with 3, whereas other isomers (compounds 1 and 2) are
inactive. This must reflect the unnatural substrate tolerances of the
salvage pathway enzymes, although the specific bottlenecks for the
2- and 4-azido analogues are not yet known. Furthermore, cell
surface labeling with compound 3 likely reflects glycoprotein
(5) Vocadlo, D. J.; Hang, H. C.; Kim, E. J.; Hanover, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 9116-9121.
(6) Rosen, S. D. Annu. ReV. Immunol. 2004, 22, 129-56.
(7) Kim, Y. J.; Varki, A. Glycoconjugate J. 1997, 5, 569-576.
(8) Becker, D. J.; Lowe, J. B. Glycobiology 2003, 13, 41R-53R.
(9) Nichols, E. J.; Kannagi, R.; Hakomori, S.-I.; Krantz, M. J.; Fuks, A. J.
Immunol. 1985, 135, 1911-1913.
(10) Fuster, M. M.; Esko, J. D. Nat. ReV. Cancer 2005, 5, 526-542.
(11) Shi, S.; Stanley, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 5234-5239.
(12) (a) Srivastava, G.; Kaur, K. J.; Hindsgaul, O.; Palcic, M. M. J. Biol. Chem.
1992, 267, 22356-22361. (b) Vogel, C.; Bergemann, C.; Otter, A.-J.;
Lindhorst, T. K.; Thiem, J.; Dahlhoff, W. V.; Ha¨llgren, C.; Palcic, M.
M.; Hindsgaul, O. Liebigs Ann. 1997, 601-612.
(13) Anisuzzaman, A. K. M.; Horton, D. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 169, 258-
262.
(14) Komba, S.; Ishida, H.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996,
4, 1833-1847.
(15) Speers, A. E.; Cravatt, B. F. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 535-546.
(16) Chan, T. R.; Hilgraf, R.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 2853-2855.
(17) Cataldi, T. R.; Campa, C.; De Benedetto, G. E. J. Anal. Chem. 2000,
368, 739-758.
JA064619Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 37, 2006 12079