436
Y. A. Ammar et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2006, 339, 429–436
[2] W. J. Depaso, R. H. Winterbauer, Dis Mon 1991, 37, 65–
Histopathology
133.
To evaluate morphological damage, a disease index was com-
puted for each animal as described in Card et al. [23] with the eva-
luator unaware of the animal treatments. The disease index,
which quantified thickening and cellular infiltration, was calcu-
lated as the mean of the values for equal numbers of sections
taken from the upper, middle, and lower lung.
[3] M. J. Sheppard, K. N. Harrison, Thorax 1992, 47, 1064–
1074.
[4] E. Crouch, Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259, 159–184.
[5] J. P. Kehrer, S. B. Margolin, Toxicol. Lett. 1997, 90, 125–
132.
[6] T. Yehualaeshet, R. O' Connor, A. Begleiter, J. E. Murphy-
Ullrich, et al., Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000, 23, 204–
212.
Hydroxyproline measurement
Lung HP content was measured as follows: Samples were homo-
genized and then hydrolyzed in 5 mL of 6 N HCl for 72 h at
1108C. The hydrolysate was then neutralized with 2.75 mL of
10 M NaOH. Aliquots (0.2 mL) were analyzed for HP content after
the addition of 0.6 mL of chloramines T, 0.6 mL of Ehrlich’s
reagent. Samples were read for absorbance at 550 nm in a spec-
trophotometer. Results are expressed as lmol of hydroxyproline
per lung according to the method of Lindenschmidt and Witschi
[24].
[7] S. N. Iyer, G. Gurujeyalakshmi, S. N. Giri, J. Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 1999, 291, 367–373.
[8] S. N. Iyer, J. S. Wild, M. J. Schiedt, D. M. Hyde, et al., J. Lab.
Clin. Med. 1995, 125, 779–785.
[9] M. R. Shetlar, C. L. Shetlar, FASEB J. 1995, A967.
[10] A. M. Hussein, S. M. Sherif, A. A. Attala, Monatsh. Chem.
1996, 127.
Bronchoalveolar lavage
[11] Z. H. Khalil, A. A. Geies, A. M. Kamal El-Dean, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 668–670.
For determination of inflammation following bleomycin admin-
istration, each animal was killed by injection of sodium pento-
barbital (300 mg/kg, i. p.), the lungs and trachea were removed
en bloc, and two successive 5.0 mL aliquots of warm (378C) phos-
phate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) were infused and slowly with-
drawn from the lungs through a cannula inserted into the tra-
chea. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) volumes routinely
measured between 8.0 and 9.0 mL. BALF were centrifuged at
10006g for 10 min at 48C, after which the supernatants were
removed and saved for determination of LDH activity and pro-
tein content. The cell pellets were resuspended in PBS, and total
cell counts were determined on a haemocytometer. Concur-
rently, alveolar macrophage viabilities were assessed by trypan
blue exclusion. In addition, BALF cell samples were centrifuged
onto microscope slides using a Shandon Cytospin 2 centrifuge
(Shandon Southern Products Limited, Runcorn, Cheshire, Eng-
land), stained with Wright's stain, and differential cell counts
determined under a light microscope by counting 300 to 400
cells/animal. Absolute cell numbers were log10 transformed for
data analysis and presentation. The LDH activity of the BALF
supernatants was determined using a commercially available
kit (Sigma LDH procedure No. DG1340-UV), and the BALF protein
content was determined by the method of Lowry et al. [25] using
bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard.
[12] A. R. Katritzky, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1963, 1, 347.
[13] M. A. Al-Shiekh, A. M. Salah El-Din, E. A. Hafez, M. H. El-
Nagdi, J. Chem. Res. Synop. 2004, 174–179.
[14] F. Al-Omran, A. Abou El-Khair, M. H. Elnagdi., J. Chem. Res.
Synop. 1998, 798–799.
[15] M. M. Ghorab, E. Noaman, M. M. F. Ismail, H. I. Heiba, et
al., Arzneim – Forsch/Drug Res. (in press).
[16] G. H. Elgemeie, H. A. Ali, A. H. Elghandour, Gh. W. Abd-
Elaziz, Phosphorus, Sulfur Relat. Elem. 2000, 164, 189–197.
[17] F. Wroblewski, J. S. La Due, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1956,
91, 569–571.
[18] A. Karmen, J. Clin. Invest. 1955, 34, 131–133.
[19] G. N. Bowers Jr., R. B. McComb, Clin. Chem. 1966, 12, 70–
89.
[20] R. J. Gay, R. B. McComb, G. N. Bowers Jr., Clin. Chem. 1968,
14, 740–753.
[21] J. A. Lustgasten, R. E. Wenk, Clin. Chem. 1972, 36, 211–
216.
[22] L. A. Kaplan in Clinical Chemistry Theory, Analysis and Cor-
relation, (Eds.: L. A. Kaplan, A. J. Pesce), C V Mosby Com-
pany, St Louis, 1984, p. 12561.
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test was used for analysis of the biochemical param-
eters. The data were expressed as mean l standard error. Statisti-
cal analysis was done according to Snedecor and Cochron [26].
[23] J. W. Card, R. G. Leeder, W. J. Racz, J. F. Brien, et al., Tox-
icology 1999, 133, 75–84.
[24] R. C. Lindenschmidt, H. P. Witschi, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
1985, 232, 346–350.
[25] O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, R. J. Randall, J.
Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275.
References
[26] G. W. Snedecor, W. G. Cochron, “Statistical Methods”, 8th
Edition, Louis State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA,
1988.
[1] G. W. Hunninghake, A. R. Kalika, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care
Med. 1995, 151, 915–918.
i 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim