In our previous studies, the strain Rhodococcus sp.
CGMCC 0497 has been screened out in our laboratory
and proved to be a powerful nitrile hydratase/amidase-
containing microorganism. It has also been demonstrated
that the strain was an efficient enantioselective biocata-
lytic system and was able to transform a variety of
R-substituted arylacetonitriles into optically pure R-sub-
stituted arylacetamides and R-substituted arylacetic acid
such as the famous nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug
(S)-naproxen with excellent enantiomeric excesses.8 We
recently have focused our attention on the asymmetric
hydrolysis of prochiral R,R-disubstituted malononitriles,
owing to the interest in the synthesis of enantiopure R,R-
dialkylated R-amino acids through enzymatic method.
P r a ctica l Syn th esis of Op tica lly Active
r,r-Disu bstitu ted Ma lon a m ic Acid s th r ou gh
Asym m etr ic Hyd r olysis of Ma lon a m id e
Der iva tives w ith Rh od ococcu s sp .
CGMCC 0497
Zhong-Liu Wu and Zu-Yi Li*
State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic & Natural Products
Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, 354 Fenglin Road, Shanghai
200032, China
lizy@pub.sioc.ac.cn
Received November 12, 2002
This class of nonproteinogenic R-amino acids has
attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their
potential to induce particular conformations when incor-
porated into a polypeptidic chain. They can therefore be
used as enzyme inhibitors and offer opportunities for
drug discovery.9 However, compared to the synthesis of
optically active R-monosubstituted amino acids, highly
efficient methods to the asymmetric synthesis of R,R-
dialkylated R-amino acids are relatively rare and their
extensive use is limited by the availability of enantiopure
compounds in large scale.10 Considered to be an attractive
approach, enzyme-catalyzed resolution has been success-
fully applied to the production of R-monosubstituted
amino acid, but the attempt to extending the methodology
to R,R-dialkylated R-amino acids was not satisfying,
because the process is generally slow and less stereo-
selective and the undesired enantiomer cannot be race-
mized.10 In this paper, we report a practical enzymatic
method for the synthesis of optically pure R,R-disubsti-
tuted malonamic acids, precursors of R,R-dialkylated
R-amino acids, by asymmetric hydrolysis of diamides with
Rhodococcus sp. CGMCC 0497.
Abstr a ct: A variety of R,R-disubstituted malonamides
undergo enantioselective hydrolysis with Rhodococcus sp.
CGMCC 0497 to give challenging enantiopure R,R-disubsti-
tuted malonamic acids with up to >99% enantiomeric
excesses and 98% chemical yields. The enantioselectivity
originated from the effects of a highly enantioselective
amidase. The products could be converted to valuable (R)-
or (S)-R,R-dialkylated amino acids after routine conversions.
Nitrile-converting enzymes have been known for sev-
eral decades1 and demonstrated great potential in organic
synthesis and chemical industry,2 but the substrates
studied are still very limited and the ability of the
enzymes to catalyze stereoselective conversion remains
largely unexploited.3,4 So far, most studies focus on the
enantioselective conversion of racemic nitriles, such as
R-alkyl nitriles,5a,5b R-hydroxy nitriles,5c,5d R-acyloxy
nitriles,5e R-amino nitriles,5f,5g and â-acetoxy nitriles,5h
while only a few focus on prochiral nitriles especially
malononitrile derivatives.6,7
Yokoyama et al. have reported the hydrolysis of
prochiral disubstituted malononitriles by Rhodococcus
rhodochrous ATCC 21197, but the substrate was limited
to 2-butyl-2-methylmalononitrile.7 In our study, first,
dinitriles were used as substrate. In accordance with the
literature, 2-butyl-2-methylmalononitrile can be con-
verted to (R)-2-butyl-2-methylmalonamic acid neatly by
Rhodococcus sp. CGMCC 0497. However, when 2-benzyl-
2-methyl-malononitrile 1 was used as substrate (0.125%
w/v), most probably due to the steric hindrance, the
products isolated were a complex mixture of hydrolysis
intermediates (Scheme 1). After 66 h, the reaction give
(1) (a) Thimann, K. V.; Mahadervan, S. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
1964, 105, 133. (b) Asano, Y.; Fujishiro, K.; Tani, Y.; Yamada, H. Agri.
Biol. Chem. 1982, 46, 1165.
(2) (a) Kobayashi, M.; Nagasawa, T.; Yamada, H. TIBTECH 1992,
10, 402. (b) Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000,
4, 95.(c) Peter, M.; Kiener, A. Green Chem. 1999, 4, 99. (d) Kiener, A.;
Roduit, J .-P.; Tinschert, A.; Heinzmann, K. Synlett. 1994, 10, 814. (e)
Glo¨ckler, R.; Roduit, J .-P. Chimia 1996, 50, 413. (f) Hann, E. C.;
Eisenberg, A.; Fager, S. K.; Perkins, N. E.; Gallagher, F. G.; Cooper,
S. M.; Gavagan, J . E.; Stieglitz, B.; Hennesey, S. M.; DiCosimo, R.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 2239.
(3) (a) Wieser, M.; Nagasawa T. In Stereoselective Biocatalysis; Patel,
R. N., ED.; Dekker: New York, NY, 2000; pp 461-486. (b) Sugai, T.;
Yamazaki, T.; Yokoyama, M.; Ohta, H. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem.
1997, 61, 1419.
(4) (a) Faber, K. Biotransformations in organic chemistry: A text-
book, 4th ed.; Spring-Verlag: Berlin, 2000; Chapter 2. (b) Crosby, J .;
Moilliet, J .; Parratt, J . S.; Turner, N. J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1994, 1679.
(6) (a) Beard, T.; Cohen, M. A.; Parratt, J . S.; Turner, N. J .; Crosby,
J .; Moilliet, J . Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 1085. (b) Kakeya; H.;
Sakai, N.; Sano, A.; Yokoyama, M.; Sugai, T.; Ohta, H. Chem. Lett.
1991, 1823.
(7) Yokoyama, M.; Sugai, T.; Ohta, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1993, 4, 1081.
(8) (a) Wu, Z.-L.; Li, Z.-Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 3305.
(b) Wu, Z.-L.; Li, Z.-Y. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2002, 35, 61.
(9) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ariza, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 2635 and references therein. (b) Ma, D.; Ding, K. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 2515. (c) Clark, J . S.; Middleton, M. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 765. (d)
Ooi, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Kameda, M.; Maruoka, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 5228.
(5) (a) Wang, M.-X.; Lu, G.; J i, G.-J .; Huang, Z.-T.; Meth-Cohn O.;
Colby, J . Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1123. (b) Payne, S.; Wu,
S.; Fallon, R. D.; Tudor, G.; Stieglitz, B.; Turner J . M.; Nelson, M. J .
Biochemistry 1997, 36, 5447. (c) Yamamoto, K.; Oishi, K.; Fujimatsu
I.; Komatus, K. I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 3028. (d)
DeSantis, G.; Zhu, Z.; Greenberg, W. A.; Wong, K.; Chaplin, J .; Hanson,
S. R.; Farwell, B.; Nicholson, L. W.; Rand, C. L.; Weiner, D. P.;
Robertson, D. E.; Burk, M. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9024. (e)
Layh, N.; Stolz, A.; Forster, S.; Effenberger F.; Knackmuss, H.-J . Arch.
Microbiol. 1992, 158, 405. (f) Macadam, A. M.; Knowles, C. J .
Biotechnol. Lett. 1985, 7, 865. (g) Wang, M.-X.; Lin, S.-J . J . Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 6542. (h) Idogaki, H.; Kasai, N.; Takeuchi, M.; Hatada, M.;
Suzuki, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 369.
(10) Cativiela, C.; Diaz-de-Villegas, M. D. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998, 9, 3517 and references therein.
10.1021/jo026691u CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/14/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2479-2482
2479