Published on Web 08/31/2007
trans-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine Is a Weak Director of Absolute
Helicity in Chiral Nickel-Salen Complexes
Zhenzhen Dong, Glenn P. A. Yap, and Joseph M. Fox*
Contribution from the Brown Laboratories, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
UniVersity of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716
Received May 30, 2007; E-mail: jmfox@udel.edu
Abstract: The interconversion between helical diastereomers of nickel-salen-based foldamers can be
observed on a NMR time scale. Such complexes provide quantitative information about the propensity of
different elements of central chirality to control the absolute sense of folding. trans-Cyclohexane-1,2-
diaminesa common component of chiral salen catalystssis a surprisingly weak director of absolute helicity
in nickel-salen foldamers. Implications for asymmetric catalysis are discussed.
Introduction
Chiral salens are exceptionally useful ligands for asymmetric
catalysis,1 and the origin of asymmetric induction in reactions
catalyzed by chiral metal-salen complexes has been a topic of
considerable interest.2-5 Many models for asymmetric induction
by salen-metal catalysts have focused on the role of central
chirality, in which stereogenic centers within the catalyst
backbone directly influence the approach of a substrate to one
enantiotopic face of the catalyst.2 However, central chirality can
also induce helicity in salen-metal complexes, and in some
models for asymmetric induction, it has been argued that
helical6,7 chirality plays a critical role in asymmetric catalysis.3-5
For example, elegant studies by Katsuki have demonstrated
that chiral donor ligands can induce a high enantioselectivity
inepoxidationscatalyzedbyachiralmanganese-salencatalysts.1b,c,3c
Computational studies on the manganese-salen catalyzed
epoxidation have also connected asymmetric induction to
folding of the salen ligand.5 More recently, Rawal and co-
workers hypothesized that helicity plays a role in cobalt-salen
catalyzed asymmetric Diels-Alder reactions, and this hypo-
thesis guided the design of a more effective generation of
catalysts.4
Figure 1. Mismatched chirality in metallofoldamers as a probe for helical
bias.
Implicit to models that invoke helicity to explain asymmetric
induction is that an element of central chirality (typically a chiral
diamine) creates a bias for one sense of folding in metal-salen
complexes. However, two helical diastereomers are possible for
metal-salens derived from chiral diamines. Under catalytic
conditions, it is possible that these diastereomers would
equilibrate and that Curtin-Hammett kinetics would be relevant.
Currently, tools for directly measuring such ratios of helical
diastereomers are lacking. We hypothesized that ratios of helical
diastereomers could be measured by juxtaposing different
elements of chirality within salen complexes that are predisposed
to fold (Figure 1). In this scenario, the chiral end-group (R*)
would bias for the formation of a (M)-helix, whereas the diamine
would bias for the diastereomeric metallofoldamer of (P)-
helicity. Spectroscopic and crystallographic studies of such
complexes would provide a measure of the ability of the chiral
diamine to control helicity relative to the end-group.
(1) (a) Larrow, J. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 4, 123.
(b) Katsuki, T. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 131. (c) Katsuki, T. Synlett
2003, 281.
(2) (a) Jacobsen, E. N.; Zhang, W.; Muci, A. R.; Ecker, J. R.; Deng, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7063. (b) Zhang, W.; Loebach, J. L.; Wilson, S. R.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2801.
Previously, we described helical nickel-salophens 1 and 2,
in which absolute helicity is determined by chiral end-groups
A and B (Figure 2).8,9 For 1, two conformers of opposite helicity
interconvert on the NMR time scale with a slight (∼2:1) bias
for the (M)-helix over the (P)-helix. By contrast, 2 is dominated
by an (M)-helix that is stabilized by 3-point hydrogen bonds.
(3) (a) Katsuki, T. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1996, 113, 87. (b) Hamada, T.;
Fukuda, T.; Imanishi, H.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 515. (c)
Hashihayata, T.; Ito, Y.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 9541. (d)
Noguchia, Y.; Irie, R.; Fukuda, T.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 4533. (e) Ito, Y. N.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4325.
(4) (a) Huang, Y.; Iwama, T.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
5950. (b) McGilvra, J. D.; Rawal, V. H. Synlett 2004, 2440.
(5) Jacobsen, H.; Cavallo, L. Chem.sEur. J. 2001, 7, 800.
(6) We consider chiral stepped conformations1 of salens to be encompassed
within the definition of helical chirality.
(7) It has been demonstrated that multiple elements of chirality can work
synergistically to induce asymmetry in metal-salen catalyzed transforma-
tions. See ref 1b,c and (a) Walsh, P. J.; Lurain, A. E.; Balsells, J. Chem.
ReV. 2003, 103, 3297. (b) DiMauro, E. F.; Kozlowski, M. C. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1641.
(8) (a) Zhang, F.; Bai, S.; Yap, G. P. A.; Tarwade, V.; Fox, J. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 10590. (b) Dong, Z.; Karpowicz, R. J., Jr.; Bai, S.; Yap,
G. P. A.; Fox, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14242.
(9) For salen-based foldamers, see footnotes in ref 8 and Akine, S.; Taniguchi,
T.; Nabeshima, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15765.
9
11850
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2007, 129, 11850-11853
10.1021/ja073900p CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society