Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions.[a]
tion of alkynyl amine 1 with tosyl (Ts) and triflate (Tf)
groups provided 2a in high yield (Table 2, entries 1 and 2),
but no isolable product was detected if alkynyl amine 1
bearing PhCO and PhNHCO groups were used (Table 2, en-
tries 3 and 4). With alkynyl amine 1 having a Ts group as
the substituent, different hypervalent iodine compounds
Entry
Equiv. of PhI
(OAc)2
Solvent
T [8C]
2a:3a [%][b]
were also screened. The employment of PhI
ACHTUNGTRNEUN(NG COOtBu)2 and
PhI(COOPh)2 as oxidants diminished the yield of pyrrole
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
1
2
3
4
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
DMF
THF
CH3CN
DCE
tBuOH
DCE
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
25
50
100
120
70
70
70
–
–
2a (Table 2, entries 5 and 6 vs 1). Other hypervalent iodine
sources such as Koser’s reagent and phenyliodine bis(tri-
fluoroacetate) (PIFA) gave inferior results (Table 2, en-
tries 7 and 8).
Under the optimized conditions, we explored the sub-
strate scope of the reaction, and the results are summarized
in Table 3. Treatment of various 2,2-disubstituted 3-alkynyl
12:–
25:–
11:–
49:–
75:10
14:–
36:9
10:50
–:64
16:trace
34:8
64:15
5
6[c]
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
amines 1 with PhIACTHNUTRGNEUNG(OAc)2 furnished the corresponding 2,3,4-
trisubstituted pyrroles 2 regioselectively in good isolated
yields (Table 3, entries 1–6 and 10). The protocol is also
viable for preparing 2,3-disubstituted pyrroles with high re-
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), solvent (3.0 mL). [b] Yield of iso-
lated product. [c] HOAc (5.0 equiv) was added.
gioselectivity using 2-substituted-3-alkynyl amines
1
(Table 3, entries 7–9). The alkynyl amines 1 with electron-
rich aromatic substituents afforded the pyrroles 2 in higher
yield than electron-deficient aromatic substituents (Table 3,
entries 2 vs 3 and 7 vs 8). Pyrrole 2e possessing cyclohexane
and pyrrole 2j bearing benzocycloheptane were obtained
readily from alkynyl amines 1e and 1j in 56% and 65%
yields, respectively (Table 3, entries 5 and 10). Two re-
gioisomers were obtained in the case of alkynyl amines 1k
and 1l with two different substituents at the 2-position
(Table 3, entries 11 and 12); these regioisomers are separa-
ble by silica-gel column chromatography. When the sub-
strate with disubstituted alkyne was used, no reaction oc-
curred and the substrate was recovered.
1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), or tBuOH (Table 1, entries 3–5).
The product 2a was obtained in 49% yield when five equiv-
alents of HOAc were added to DCE (Table 1, entry 6). Con-
sequently, when HOAc was chosen as the solvent, the yield
of trisubstituted pyrrole 2a increased to 75% and pyrrole
3a was formed in 10% yield (Table 1, entry 7). The amount
of (diacetoxyiodo)benzene also has a significant impact on
the yield of pyrroles 2a and 3a (Table 1, entry 7, and 12–
14). Using three equivalents of (diacetoxyiodo)benzene
proved to be optimal for the transformation (Table 1,
entry 7). The investigation on the effect of the temperature
showed that 2a was obtained in higher yield at 708C while
pyrrole 3a became the major product when temperature in-
creased to 1008C (Table 1, entries 7–11).
During the study of this reaction, we isolated dihydropyr-
role 4a in 8% yield using PhIACHTNUGTRENUNG(COOPh)2 as the oxidant
(Table 2, entry 6), which was deduced as a reaction inter-
mediate. To confirm this, the dihydropyrrole 5a was pre-
pared according to the literature procedure[14] and was sub-
The substituents on the nitrogen atom of alkynyl amines
showed their critical role in the reaction (Table 2). The reac-
jected to 1.2 equivalents of PhIACHTNUGTRENUNG(OAc)2 in acetic acid at 708C
[Eq. (2)]. Trisubstituted pyrroles 6a and 2a were obtained
in 29% and 5% yield, respectively, meanwhile the dihydro-
pyrrole 4a was formed in 53% yield by allylic oxidation of
the dihydropyrrole 5a. Further studies indicated that the di-
hydropyrrole 4a can be readily transformed into the trisub-
stituted pyrrole 2a in 31% yield, with the formation of
three byproducts 3a, 7a, and 8a [Eq. (3)]. These results sug-
gest that the dihydropyrrole 4a should serve as the precur-
sor of the pyrrole 2a.
Table 2. Effect of R Group of 1 and Oxidant on the Reaction.[a]
Entry
1, R
Oxidant
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(OAc)2
PhI(COOtBu)2
PhI(COOPh)2
2:4 [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ts
Tf
G
75:–
69:–
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
[c]
C(O)Ph
C(O)NHPh
Ts
Ts
Ts
Ts
R
–
–
[c]
N
G
69:–
45:8
–
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
PhI(OH)OTs
PIFA
5:–
[a] Reaction conditions:
1 (0.2 mmol), oxidant (0.6 mmol), HOAc
(3.0 mL). [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Complex mixture.
Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 3200 – 3204
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3201