Prakash and Radhakrishnan
stirred for 12 h at 30 °C. Ice mixed with water was added and
stirred for 15 min. The yellow precipitate formed was filtered out,
washed with cold water, and dried under vacuum; yield ) 49.6%.
The crude product was recrystallized by diffusing hexane vapors
into a solution in ethyl acetate yielding crystals of PINA-C: mp/
°C ) 145-147; FT-IR (KBr) νj/cm-1 ) 3231.0, 3013.1, 1603.0,
1
1570.0, 1510.0, 1475.7, 1113.0; H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ/ppm )
4.47 (d, 2H), 6.64 (d, 2H), 7.30 (d, 2H), 7.86 (t, 1H), 7.96 (d, 2H),
8.50 (d, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ/ppm ) 45.21, 111.70, 122.61,
126.61, 136.83, 148.33, 150.17, 154.63. Needle-shaped crystals of
PINA-N were grown from a mixture of acetonitrile and water (6:4
v/v).
Zn(PINA)2(CH3COO)2 (ZPA). A solution of 0.025 g (0.11
mmol) of PINA in 2 mL of methanol was mixed with a solution of
0.024 g (0.11 mmol) of zinc acetate in 2 mL of methanol and kept
at 30 °C. Crystals of the complex formed in 3 days were filtered
out, washed, and dried: yield ) 84.5%; mp/°C ) 162-164; FT-
IR (KBr): νj/cm-1 ) 3312.1, 3134.6, 3069.0, 1603.0, 1560.3, 1504.6,
1477.6, 1111.1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ/ppm ) 1.80 (s, 6H), 4.50
(d, 4H), 6.63 (d, 4H), 7.39 (d, 4H), 7.87(t, 2H), 7.96 (d, 4H), 8.52-
(d, 4H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ/ppm ) 22.89, 45.15, 111.75,
123.01, 126.62, 136.90, 149.70, 149.90, 154.56, 171.43.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of PINA in (a) PINA-C and (b) PINA-N
from single-crystal X-ray analysis. H atoms are omitted for clarity, and
90% probability thermal ellipsoids are indicated. C (gray), N (blue), and O
(red) atoms are indicated.
Zn(PINA)2(C2H5COO)2 (ZPP). A solution of 0.025 g (0.11
mmol) of PINA in 2 mL of methanol was mixed with a solution of
0.025 g (0.11 mmol) of zinc propionate in 3 mL of methanol and
kept at 30 °C. Crystals of the complex formed in 4 days were
filtered out, washed, and dried: yield ) 80.6%; mp/°C ) 136-
138; FT-IR (KBr): νj/cm-1 ) 3315.9, 3120.0, 3069.0, 2949.4,
1610.0, 1595.3, 1506.5, 1483.4, 1109.2; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6)
δ/ppm ) 0.95 (t, 6H), 2.10 (m, 4H), 4.52 (d, 4H), 6.64 (d, 4H),
7.42 (d, 4H), 7.89 (m, 2H), 7.96 (d, 4H), 8.53 (d, 4H); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6) δ/ppm ) 10.98, 28.91, 45.15, 111.76, 123.16, 126.70,
136.94, 149.79, 150.49, 154.52, 180.46.
Figure 2. H-bonded chains of PINA formed along (a) the a axis in PINA-C
and (b) the c axis in PINA-N. H atoms except those involved in H-bonding
are omitted for clarity. C (gray), H (white), N (blue), and O (red) atoms
and an H-bond (broken cyan line) are indicated.
Crystallography. X-ray diffraction data were collected on a
Bruker Nonius Smart Apex diffractometer (with CCD detector).
Mo KR radiation with a graphite crystal monochromator in the
incident beam was used. Data were reduced using SAINT; all non-
hydrogen atoms were found using the direct method analysis in
SHELXTL, and after several cycles of refinement, positions of the
hydrogen atoms were calculated and added to the refinement
process.11 The Flack parameter was refined for the zinc complexes.
Details of data collection, solution, and refinement, as well as the
crystallographic information files, are submitted as Supporting
Information.
the reference (1 U ) SHG of urea). Calibration measurements were
carried out using N-4-nitrophenyl-(S)-prolinol (NPP).
Semiempirical Computations. Geometries of the molecules and
molecular clusters for the computations were taken from the crystal
structure, and hydrogen atoms alone were optimized using the
semiempirical AM1 method13 in the program suite MOPAC93.14
Hyperpolarizabilities were computed using the TDHF method15
available in MOPAC93; the values reported are the magnitude of
â
vec, conventionally defined using the x, y, and z projections of the
various tensorial components. â0, the static value, as well as â1.17
for excitation wavelength of 1064 nm are presented.
SHG Measurement. Second harmonic generation from micro-
crystalline powders was examined using the Kurtz-Perry12 method.
Identity of the powder samples was ensured and presence of
polymorphic structures ruled out by verifying the agreement
between experimental powder X-ray patterns and those simulated
from the single-crystal structure (see Supporting Information).
Particle sizes were graded using standard sieves; sizes ranging from
40 to 300 µm were studied. Samples were loaded in glass capillaries
having an inner diameter of 600 µm. The fundamental beam (1064
nm) of a Q-switched ns-pulsed (6 ns, 10 Hz) Nd:YAG laser (Spectra
Physics model INDI-40) was used. The second harmonic signal
was collected using appropriate optics and detected using a
monochromator, PMT, and oscilloscope (Tektronix model TDS 210,
60 MHz). Filters were used to bring the signals from all the samples
in the same range. Urea with particle size ∼150 µm was used as
Results and Discussion
Two polymorphs of PINA could be crystallized depending
on the solvent employed. Ethyl acetate-hexane yielded
centrosymmetric crystals (PINA-C) belonging to the orthor-
hombic space group Pbca, whereas noncentrosymmetric
crystals (PINA-N) belonging to the monoclinic space group
Pn were obtained from acetonitrile-water solution. The
crystallographic data for the two are collected in Table 1.
The molecular structures in the two crystals are very similar
(Figure 1) except for the link between the 4-picolyl group
and pNA moiety; the dihedral angle C12-N2-C11-C8 is
respectively 121.9 and 80.7° in PINA-C and PINA-N. In
(13) Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902.
(14) MOPAC93; Fujitsu, Inc.: Tokyo, 1993.
(11) (a) SAINT-Plus, version 6.45; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, 2003. (b)
SHELXTL, version 6.14; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, 2003.
(12) Kurtz, S. K.; Perry, T. T. J. Appl. Phys. 1968, 39, 3798.
(15) Dupuis, M.; Karna, S. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 487.
9760 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 24, 2006