Langmuir
Article
cyclohexyl-n-alkanoate series are more hydrophilic than the
equivalent n-alkylbenzoates and phenyl-n-alkanoates. However,
this trend is inverted for higher homologues, with the
cyclohexyl-n-alkanoates being the most hydrophobic of the
three classes. The cyclohexyl-n-alkanoates appear to also
parallel regular n-alkanoates from the first added −CH2−
onward, behavior arising at much shorter chain length than for
the aromatic series. These observations reinforce the concept of
a thermodynamic balance between ring carbons and linear
carbons. Aromatic carbons appear to dominate the aggregation
behavior up to a certain value of n, after which the linear
−CH2− groups take over. Cyclohexyl, −CH2−, being saturated,
is closer in nature to the linear tail −CH2− carbons, hence the
break in behavior occurs at a much shorter chain length. Surface
tension measurements do not exhibit such a distinction in
behavior, with homologues belonging to either dlog(cac)/dn
branches of the Klevens plot, exhibiting typical Gibbs
adsorption profiles.
NMR experiments are consistent with lower homologues
gradually forming ill-defined structures, whereas higher
homologues present a more abrupt change more typical of
classical surfactants.
SANS profiles on the other hand show clear transitions from
apparently nonstructured solutions, then giving clear evidence
for the presence of aggregates above a certain concentration. As
with previous reports on related compounds,6,8,31 these
additives appear to form ellipsoid-shaped aggregates.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Dempsey, G.; Molyneux, P. Solubility of the cosolutes 4-
hydroxybenzoic acid and its alkyl esters (‘alkylparabens’) in aqueous
urea: evidence for 1:1 cosolute−urea association in solution and
evaluation of the methylene group contribution to the free energy of
association. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1992, 88, 971−977.
(2) Ferreira, G.; Perigo, D. M.; Politi, M. J.; Schreier, S. Effect of
anions from the Hofmeister series and tetracaine to zwitterionic
micelles. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 63, 755−761.
(3) Balasubramanian, D.; Srinivas, V.; Gaikar, V. G.; Sharma, M. M.
Aggregation behavior of hydrotropic compounds in aqueous solution.
J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3865−3870.
(4) da Silva, R. C.; Spitzer, M.; da Silva, L. H. M.; Loh, W.
Investigations on the mechanism of aqueous solubility increase caused
by some hydrotropes. Thermochim. Acta 1999, 328, 161−167.
(5) Balasubramanian, D.; Srinivas, V.; Rodley, G. A.; Ravikumar, K.;
Robinson, W. T.; Turnbull, M. M. Molecular organization in
hydrotrope assemblies. Langmuir 1997, 13, 3235−3239.
(6) Triolo, R.; Ho, P. C.; Johnson, J. S. Small-Angle Neutron
Scattering from Solutions of Low-Equivalent-Weight Organic Salts in
D2O. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 9581−9588.
(7) Balasubramanian, D.; Srinivas, V. When does the switch from
hydrotropy to micellar behavior occur. Langmuir 1998, 14, 6658−
6661.
(8) Hopkins Hatzopoulos, M.; Eastoe, J.; Dowding, P. J.; Rogers, S.
E.; Heenan, R. K.; Dyer, R. 12353 Are hydrotropes distinct from
surfactants. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12346−12353.
(9) Clayden, J.; Greeves, N.; Warren, S.; Wothers, P. Organic
Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 2001.
(10) Heenan, R. K. The “FISH” Data Fitting Program Manual;
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Report RAL-89-129.
This work reiterates the notion that physicochemical
behavior of “hydrotropes” is very similar to that of regular
surfactants.8 Further still, amplifying recent work with
surfactant ionic liquids (SAILs),33,34 it is demonstrated that
not all carbons are thermodynamically equal, even though they
are hydrophobic enough to drive aggregation and interfacial
phenomena. This is now clearly emphasized here, seen in the
distinctly different behavior of saturated cyclic versus aromatic
cyclic amphiphiles, as well as for the CH3/CH2 groups in
(11) Hayter, J. B.; Penfold, J. An analytic structure factor for maroion
solutions. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 109−118.
(12) Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York,
1980.
(13) Paquette, R. G.; Lingafelter, E. C.; Tartar, H. V. Studies of
sulfonates VII. Conductances and densities of sodium ethyl-, n-butyl-,
n-octyl-, and n-dodecylbenzene-p-sulfonate solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1943, 65, 686−692.
surfactant anions and organic countercations in SAILs.33,34
A
(14) Klevens, H. B. Critical micelle concentrations as determined by
refraction. J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 1948, 52, 130−148.
point not debated often enough is the degree of hydrophobicity
of “unusual” carbons; hence, distinguishing between surfactants
and nonsurfactant amphiphiles on the basis of hydrophobic
moiety atomic arrangements should be revisited. This aspect of
surfactant/hydrotrope chemical structure−function relation-
ships deserves further attention for providing a deeper
understanding about molecules.
(15) Skauge, A.; Splitzer, J. Surface tensions and micellization of
omega -cyclohexylalkanoic acids and their sodium salts. J. Phys. Chem.
1983, 87, 2398−2401.
(16) MacInnis, J. A.; Palepu, R.; Marangoni, G. NMR Investigations
of the micellar properties of the sodium salts of cyclohexylalkanoic
acids. Can. J. Chem. 1999, 77, 1994−2000.
(17) Martin, V. I.; Rodriguez, A.; del Mar Graciani, M.; Robinaqqq,
́
I.; Carmona, A.; Moya, M. L. Physicochemical characterization of
bromide mono- and dimeric surfactants with phenyl and cyclohexyl
rings in the head group. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 363, 284−294.
(18) Shinoda, K.; Nakagawa, T.; Tamamushi, B.; Isemura, T.
Colloidal Surfactants; Academic Press: New York, 1963.
(19) Eastoe, J.; Hopkins Hatzopoulos, M.; Dowding, P. J. Action of
hydrotropes and alkyl-hydrotropes. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 5917−5925.
(20) Pitt, A. R.; Morsley, S. D.; Burbridge, N. J.; Quickenden, E. L.
The relationship between surfactant structure and limiting values of
surface tension, in aqueous gelatin solution, with particular regard to
multilayer coating. Colloids Surf., A 1996, 114, 321−335.
(21) Atkins, P.; de Paula, J. Atkins Physical Chemistry, 7th ed.; Oxford
University Press: New York, 2002.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Additional details of hydrotrope solution properties, surface
tensions, NMR, and neutron scattering data. This material is
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(22) Eastoe, J.; Downer, A.; Pitt, A. R.; Simister, A.; Penfold, J. Effects
of hydrophobic chain structure on adsorption of fluorocarbon
surfactants with either CF3- or H-CF2-terminal groups. Langmuir
1999, 15, 7591−7599.
(23) Eastoe, J.; Mohamed, A.; Trickett, K.; Chin, S. W.; Cummings,
S.; Sagisaka, M.; Hudson, L.; Nave, S.; Dyer, R.; Rogers, S. E.; Heenan,
R. K. Universal Surfactant for Water, Oils, and CO2. Langmuir 2010,
26, 13861−13866.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
The authors thank Dr. Craig Butts for useful discussions on
NMR. M.H.H. thanks Infineum UK and the EPSRC through
the University of Bristol School of Chemistry Doctoral
Training Account for the provision of a Ph.D. studentship.
We also acknowledge ILL, ISIS, and STFC for the allocation of
beam time, travel, and consumables.
9339
dx.doi.org/10.1021/la301222m | Langmuir 2012, 28, 9332−9340