R. Mah et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 2065–2068
2067
spacher, M.; von Sprecher, A. Drugs Future 1999, 24, 883. (d)
Ting, P. C.; Lee, J. F.; Anthes, J. C.; Shih, N.-Y.; Piwinski, J. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2333. (e) Bernstein, P. R.;
Aharony, D.; Albert, J. S.; Andisik, D.; Barthlow, H. G.;
Bialecki, R.; Davenport, T.; Dedinas, R. F.; Dembofsky, B. T.;
Koether, G.; Kosmider, B. J.; Kirkland, K.; Ohnmacht, C. J.;
Potts, W.; Rumsey, W. L.; Shen, L.; Shenvi, A.; Sherwood, S.;
Stollman, D.; Russell, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11,
2769.
4. Ofner, S.; Hauser, K.; Schilling, W.; Vassout, A.; Veenstra,
S. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1623.
5. Gerspacher, M.; von Sprecher, A.; Mah, R.; Roggo, S.;
Ofner, S.; Auberson, Y.; Betschart, C.; Schilling, W.; Ander-
son, G. P.; Ball, H.; Bertrand, C.; Subramanian, N.; Hauser,
K. 5-Aryl-4-benzoyl-amino-pent-2-ene-carboxamides: a new
class of NK1 and dualNK 1/NK2 antagonists. 212th ACS
National Meeting, Aug 23–27, 1998, Boston, USA; MEDI 52.
For example, the compound with Ar=4-Cl-phenyl and
NR1R2=2-piperidin-1-yl-ethylamine exhibited IC50 values of
10 nM (NK1) and 49 nM (NK2).
6. (a) Harrison, T.; Williams, B. J.; Swain, C. J.; Ball, R. G.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2545. (b) Desai, M. C.;
Lefkowitz, S. L.; Thadeio, P. F.; Longo, K. P.; Snider, R. M.
J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4911.
Figure 2. Overlap of CGP49823 (gray), A (light green) and 8 (dark
green).
the pair of closely spaced, staggered aromatic rings6 as
the most striking common feature. Furthermore, the
presence of a H-bond accepting group (e.g., a carbonyl)
at approximately 6 A from the centroid of the first of the
two staggered rings was identified as an important con-
tributor for NK2 binding activity (Fig. 2)
In conclusion, a novel class of dual NK1/NK2 receptor
antagonists has been discovered. Severalof the reported
compounds exhibit potent affinities for both the NK1
receptor (IC50 <10 nM) and for the NK2 receptor (IC50
<50 nM). Additionally, some of the compounds dis-
played potent in vivo po activities in guinea pigs against
either NK1 or NK2 agonist-induced bronchoconstric-
tion. In addition to eliminating a stereocenter, the rigid
nature of the target molecules allows for rapid con-
formational analysis using computer-assisted molecular
modeling which, in turn, may aid in the optimization of
binding activities.
7. See also: Gerspacher, M.; La Vecchia, L.; Mah, R.; von
Sprecher, A.; Anderson, G. P.; Subramanian, N.; Hauser, K.;
Bammerlin, H.; Kimmel, S.; Pawelzik, V.; Ryffel, K.; Ball, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 3081.
8. For experimentaldetaisl see: Bittiger, H; Heid, J. In Sub-
stance P; Skrabanek, P., Powell, D. Boole; Dublin, 1983; p. 198.
9. Inhibition of 125I-NKA binding to transfected chinese
hamster ovary cells (CHO cells) expressing recombinant
human neurokinin 2 receptors: The assay was performed in
96-well plates (Nunclon) containing 200 mL 20 mM HEPES
buffer, pH 7.4 containing 2 mM MnSO4 and 6 mM MgCl2, 3 Â
105 h NK2 CHO cells, 0.05 nM 125I-NKA (2200 Ci mmolÀ1
)
and various drug concentrations. Nonspecific binding was
estimated in the presence of 50 nM NKA. The mixture was
incubated for 20 min at room temperature after which the
unbound ligand was removed by rapid filtration and washed
four times with ice-cold Tricine buffer. Filter bound radio-
activity was counted in Microscint 20 in a scintillation coun-
ter. All samples were measured in triplicate. Culture
conditions and cell isolation for hr NK2 CHOcells: Sub-
ramanian, N.; Ruesch, C.; Bertrand, C. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Comm. 1994, 200, 1512.
10. Dunkin-Hartley guinea-pigs (500–700 g) were anaes-
thetized with ip urethane (1.5 g kgÀ1), tracheotomized and
ventilated with a constant-volume ventilator (Model 683;
Harvard apparatus Co., S. Natick, MA, USA) at a frequency
of 60 breaths minÀ1. Pavulon (pancuronium bromide, Orga-
non, 1 mg kgÀ1) and atropine (Fluka, 1 mg kgÀ1) were admi-
nistered (iv) to prevent spontaneous breathing and cholinergic
reflexes, respectively. The tidal volume was adjusted to about
1 mL 100 gÀ1 body weight so as to maintain normalarterial
blood gases. Intratracheal pressure was measured with a dif-
ferentialpressure transducer (ModelDP 45–28, Vaidl yne
Engineering Corp., Northridge, CA, USA). Polyethylene
catheters (250 I.U. mLÀ1 heparin in 0.9% NaCl) were inserted
into the right jugular vein for drug injection and the left
carotid for blood pressure measurements (Statham transducer
P23XL). All signals were recorded using a computer data-
acquisition system (Mi2 Bio Report software, Modular
Instruments). The timing of anaesthesia and animalprepara-
tion were such that after a baseline period was obtained, Sar9-
SP (3 mg kgÀ1; ED80 dose for increase in intratrachealpres-
sure) or b-Ala8-NKA (0.8 mg kgÀ1 ED80 dose) was injected,
corresponding to a time of 2, 4 or 12 h since the oraldosing of
vehicle or drug. The antagonists were given in doses ranging
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank H. Bammerlin, E. Braun, A.
Cosenti, M. Erard, C. Ferraretto, S. Fuhrer, H. Het-
trich, S. Kimmel, M. Kuhn, Th. Kull, M. Modena, C.
Mouzo, T. Osman, V. Pawelzik, C. Ruesch, K. Ryffel,
N. Stuber, A. Widmer and D. Wyss for their excellent
technicalassistance.
References and Notes
1. (a) Longmore, J.; Swain, C. J.; Hill, R. G. Drug News Per-
spec. 1995, 8, 5. (b) Kucharczyk, N. Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs
1995, 4, 299. (c) Elliott, J.; Seward, E. M. Exp. Opin. Ther.
Pat. 1997, 7, 43. (d) Longmore, J.; Hill, R. G.; Hargreaves,
R. J. Can. J. Phys. Pharmacol. 1997, 75, 612. (e) von Sprecher,
A.; Gerspacher, M.; Anderson, G. P. Idrugs 1998, 1, 73.
2. (a) Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.; Rodger, I. W.; Jones, T. R.
Drug. News Perspec. 1992, 5, 542. (b) Geppetti, P.; Bertrand,
C.; Ricciardolo, F. M. L.; Nadel, J. A. Can. J. Phys. Pharma-
col. 1995, 7, 843. (c) Advenier, C.; Lagente, V.; Boichot, E.
Eur. Respir. J. 1997, 10, 1892. (d) Chapman, R. W.; Hey, J. A.;
McLeod, R.; Minnicozzi, M.; Rizzo, Ch. Drug News Perspect.
1998, 11, 480.
3. (a) Murai, M.; Morimoto, H.; Maeda, Y.; Kiyotoh, S.;
Nishikawa, M.; Fujii, T. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1992, 262,
403. (b) Joos, G. F.; Van Schoor, J.; Kips, J. C.; Pauwels, R. A.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996, 153, 1781. (c) Ger-