5702
A. Koubeissi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5700–5703
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) TBDMSCl, DBU, CH3CN, 0 °C then rt, 24 h, 82%; (b) (Boc)2O, Et3N, acetone, H2O, rt, 24 h, 80%; (c) N,O-
dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride, TBTU, HOBt, DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt, 12 h, 61%; (d) butenyl magnesium bromide, THF, ꢀ78 °C then 3.5 h, rt,
30 min, 55%; (e) TBAF, THF, rt, 1 h, 87%; (f) PDC, DMF, rt, 3 h, 71%; (g) i—Cs2CO3, MeOH, H2O then reduced pressure; ii—benzyl bromide,
DMF, rt, 4.5 h, 86%; (h) RuCl3ÆxH2O NaIO4, H2O, CH3CN, rt 1 h, 96%; (i) N-hydroxysuccinimide, DMAP, DCC, THF, 0 °C, 10 min then rt, 48 h,
49%; (j) DIEA, DMF, rt, 24 h, 94%.
Table 1. Mean inhibitory activity (%) of reversins and synthesized
analogs on human leukemic cells K562/R716b
References and notes
Compounda
Mean inhibiting activityb
%
1. Gottesman, M. M.; Fojo, T.; Bates, S. E. Nat. Rev. Cancer
2002, 2, 48.
2. Gottesman, M. M.; Pastan, I.; Ambudkar, S. V. Curr.
Opin. Genet. Dev. 1996, 6, 610.
1a Reversin 121
72.73 ( 5.27)
52.70 ( 5.27)
85.43 ( 5.69)
1b
1c
´
3. Szakacs, G.; Paterson, J. K.; Ludwig, J. A.; Booth-
Genthe, C.; Gottesman, M. M. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2006,
5, 219.
4. Teodori, E.; Dei, S.; Scapecchi, S.; Gualtieri, F. Il Farmaco
2002, 57, 385.
5. (a) Sharom, F. J.; DiDiodato, G.; Yu, X.; Ashbourne, K.
J. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 10334; (b) Sepro¨di, J.;
2a Reversin 213
93.74 ( 2.17)
94.45 ( 1.36)
74.14 ( 4.06)
79.08 ( 5.13)
82.22 ( 4.57)
54.71 ( 3.63)
98.33 ( 1.35)
3.35 ( 3.44)
86.62 ( 4.86)
2b
3a
3b
8a
8b
8c
10
16
´
´
´
Mezo˜, I.; Vadasz, Zs.; Szabo, K.; Sarkadi, B.; Teplan, I.
In Peptides 1996; Proceedings of the 24th European
Symposium, 1996, Edimburgh; Ramage, R., Epton, R.,
Eds; Mayflower Scientific Ltd: Kingswinford, 1998; pp
a Compounds were tested at a 10 lM concentration.
´
´
´
801–802.; (c) Vadasz, Zs.; Szabo, K.; Sarkadi, B.; Teplan,
b Cyclosporin A was used as positive control (mean inhibitory activity
of 100%) at a final concentration of 2 lM. Standard deviation is
given in parentheses.
´
´
I.; Mak, M.; Miklos, I.; Gyo¨rffy, E.; Sepro¨di, J. In
Peptides 1998; Proceedings of the 25th European Sympo-
sium, 1998, Budapest; Bajusz, S., Hudecz, F., Eds;
Akademiai Kiado Ed: Budapest, 1999; pp 640–641.
6. Sharom, F. J.; Yu, X.; Lu, P.; Liu, R.; Chu, J. W. K.;
´
´
Szabo, K.; Muller, M.; Hose, C. D.; Monks, A.; Varadi,
¨
an amino methylene isostere did not impair the capacity
to inhibit Pgp-mediated drug efflux (1a vs 3a and 2b vs
8c). Analogs with cyclohexyl ester presented an in-
creased inhibitory activity when compared to 2,4-di-
methyl-3-pentyl ester analogs (1b vs 1c and 8b vs 8c).
Moreover, exchanging benzyl ester by cyclohexyl ester
was tolerated as shown in Table 1 by comparing activity
for compounds 2a and 2b. Finally, the inhibitory activ-
ity of ketomethylene analog 16 was conserved indicating
that inserting a succinyl moiety into reversin 121 1a was
not detrimental to the Pgp-mediated drug efflux inhibi-
tory activity.
A. E.; Sepro¨di, J.; Sarkadi, B. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999,
58, 571.
7. Martinez, J.; Bali, J.-P.; Rodriguez, M.; Castro, B.;
Magous, R.; Laur, J.; Lignon, M.-F. J. Med. Chem.
1985, 28, 1874.
8. The aminoaldehydes were synthesized by reduction of
aminoacids-derived mixed anhydrides with NaBH4 and
then oxidized by Swern oxidation.
9. VanRheenen, V.; Kelly, R. C.; Cha, D. Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1976, 17, 1973.
10. (a) Baldwin, J. E.; Hulme, C.; Edwards, A. J.; Schofield,
C. J.; Parkes, K. E. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1665;
(b) Delcros, J.-G.; Tomasi, S.; Carrington, S.; Martin, B.;
Renault, J.; Blagbrough, I. S.; Uriac, P. J. Med. Chem.
2002, 45, 5098; (c) Spectral data of diastereoisomeric
hemiaminals 60: IR (film, m, cmꢀ1): 3412 (OH and NH),
3066 (arom CH), 2954 (al CH), 1738 (C@O ester), 1674
(CO amide). ESIMS (negative mode, NaCl): 856,9
We have designed aminomethylene and ketomethylene
analogs with inhibitory activity of Pgp-mediated drug
efflux comparable to that of reversins 121 1a and 213
2a. We envisage now the synthesis of ketomethylene
analogs of reversin 121 and modified side chain analogs
to confirm and refine our first results.
1
(2M+Clꢀ), 446,0 (M+Clꢀ). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3,
d ppm): 7.36 (20H, m, 4-Phe), 5.31 (2H, m, 2 CHOH), 5.18