Organic Letters
Letter
Table 1. Optimization with Sulfonamide 2a and Olefin 1
Scheme 1. Substrate Scope for the Base-Promoted Reaction
with a Range of Nucleophiles
b
19F NMR yield (%)
a
c
d
entry
base (equiv), solvent, temp
3a
4a 5a
6a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NaH (2.2), DMPU, rt
NaH (1.2), DMPU, rt
t-BuOK (1.2), DMPU, rt
13
2
6
−
50
45
9
8
7
86
23
21
5
4
3
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
2
14
13
12
15
9
16
10
9
7
7
t-BuOK (1.2), DMPU/t-BuOH 6:4, rt
KOH (1.2), DMPU/t-BuOH 6:4, rt
KOH (1.2), DMPU/t-BuOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), DMPU/EtOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), DMPU/i-PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), NMP/i-PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), DMF/i- PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), DMSO/i-PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (1.2), DMPU/i-PrOH 4:6, 50 °C
KOH (1.5), DMPU/i-PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
KOH (2.0), DMPU/i-PrOH 6:4, 50 °C
48
48
55
69
73
60
69
64
72
73
71
2
−
−
−
3
−
−
−
9
10
11
12
13
14
e
6
a
For reactions at room temperature, 1 was added at −30 °C followed
b
by a slow temperature ramp. 19F NMR yields were calculated with
1,4-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene as an internal standard. Z/E ratio in
c
a
2.5 equiv of KOH used.
d
all reactions ≥97:3. Compounds 5a were obtained as a mixture of E
e
and Z isomers. Isolated yield (75% yield by 19F NMR) and Z/E ratio
of 97:3.
was obtained with thiopyridine 2p. The reaction with di-
isopropyl malonate gave the corresponding cyclopropyl
derivative 7 in 16% yield, comparable to a previous result
using 2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropene.16
formation of 3a, but also increased the amount of addition
product 6a (entries 4−5). At a higher reaction temperature (50
°C) and using isopropyl alcohol as a cosolvent, the desired
product 3a was obtained in 73% yield (entry 8). Replacing
DMPU by other polar aprotic solvents such as N-methyl-2-
pyrrolidone (NMP), DMF, or DMSO gave 3a in yields of 60−
69% (entries 9−11). Solvents such as THF, dioxane, and
acetonitrile, as well as alternative bases, such as NaOH, Cs2CO3,
K3PO4, DBU, and Triton B, did not increase the yield of 3a (see
alcohol and potassium hydroxide had only a minor impact on
the reaction outcome (entries 12−14).
The scope and limitations of the optimized procedure was
assessed over a broad range of N-, O-, and S-nucleophiles with
olefin 1 (Scheme 1). Di-tert-butyl-iminodicarboxylate 2b was
successfully converted in high (Z)-selectivity to β-trifluor-
omethyl-ethene 3b in 49% yield. N-Vinyl hetereoaromatic
nitrogen compounds 3c−3f were obtained in yields of 60−69%,
albeit with lower Z/E ratios. Noteworthy, in the cases of triazole
2e and pyridinone 2f, the reaction proceeded with good
chemoselectivity and only the regioisomers 3e and 3f were
obtained. Phenols 2g−2j and oxime 2k gave enol ethers 3g−3k
in good yields (58−78%) with excellent Z/E selectivities
(>98:2). Benzyl enol ether 3l was isolated in poor yield, which
may be a result of incomplete deprotonation of the benzyl
alcohol 2l; replacing the base with potassium tert-butoxide did
not increase the yield of 3l. Reactions with benzyl thiols 2m and
2n gave (E)-vinyl sulfides 3m and 3n as main products, in yields
of 78% and 75%, whereas reactions with aromatic thiols 2o, 2p,
and 2q resulted in the formation of (Z)-isomers 3o, 3p, and 3q
in yields of 86−97%. Notably, a good S- vs N- chemoselectivity
To gain a deeper understanding of the origin of selectivity in
these transformations, we undertook a series of preliminary
mechanistic investigations (Scheme 2). In each reaction shown
in Scheme 1, 3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-yne 8 was detected in small
amounts by 19F NMR, implicating it as a possible intermediate in
the formation of the olefinic products. Previous experimental
studies on nucleophilic additions to trifluoromethylpropyne
derivatives exhibited a strong preference for (Z)-olefin products
(anti-addition).17 This is consistent with ab initio molecular
orbital studies showing preferential trans bending of acetylene in
the transition state for nucleophilic attack.18 This trans bending
forms the vinylic anion with the lone pair anti to the nucleophile.
Owing to the high rotation barrier in simple alkyl or aryl
substituted vinylic anions, protonation leads to an overall anti
addition.19 Indeed, the reaction of various nucleophiles (2a, 2g,
2m, and 2o) with alkyne 8 gave the β-trifluoromethyl
substituted alkenes (3a, 3g, 3m, and 3o) with excellent (Z)-
selectivities (Scheme 2a). These results are consistent with
alkyne 8 being a key intermediate leading for many nucleophiles
to the formation of (Z)-alkenes as the major product (Scheme
1). However, the (E)-selectivity observed with benzyl thiols 2m
and 2n suggests that this particular reaction proceeds either
partially or exclusively through another pathway, or that E/Z
isomerization is particularly favored in 3m and 3n. A possible E/
Z isomerization pathway leading to (E)-3 could result from a
nucleophilic vinylic substitution (SNV)20 with a second
nucleophile 2 on olefin (Z)-3. To support such a mechanism,
vinyl sulfide 3m was treated with thiol 2n under standard
conditions (Scheme 2b). However, only a small amount of
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX