3486
U. Das et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 3484–3487
ern the magnitude of the FAR values. However the biodata gener-
ated suggest that development of analogs of series 7 should take
place in which the terminal basic group is a heterocycle containing
one nitrogen atom such as hexamethyleneimine or heptamethyle-
neimine. Third, the substituents in the arylidene aryl rings were
examined in terms of MDR-reversing potencies. In each of the ser-
ies 5–8, greater potencies were noted with the compounds bearing
4-methyl and 4-chloro substitutents. This observation may have
been due to the p and molecular refractivity (MR) values of these
groups. The p constants for hydrogen, methyl, chloro and nitro
group are 0.00, 0.56, 0.71 and À0.28, respectively,24 indicating
the greater hydrophobicity of the methyl and chloro substituents.
The MR figures of hydrogen, methyl, chloro and nitro groups are
1.03, 5.65, 6.03 and 7.36, respectively,24 suggesting that an optimal
MR value may have been reached while smaller and larger MR fig-
ures detract from MDR-reversing properties. Thus groups which
are lipophilic and have MR values of approximately 5–6 should
be placed in the arylidene aryl rings, for example, the trifluoro-
methyl substituent has p and MR values of 0.88 and 5.02,
respectively.24
A number of studies revealed the high lipophilicity of various
MDR-reversal agents25,26; for example, the calculated logP values
of a number of 1,4-dihydropyridines which reverse MDR were in
the region of 5.1–7.5.27 The calculated logP values of the com-
pounds in series 4–9 and verapamil are presented in Table 1. The
average logP figures for the compounds in series 4–9 are 3.90,
5.14, 5.90, 6.05, 4.99 and 1.92, respectively. Thus the compounds
displaying significant capabilities in reversing MDR, namely series
5–8, have logP values in the region of 5–6. On the other hand, the
compounds in series 4 and 9, which are virtually bereft of anti-
MDR properties, have lower logP values. However, linear and log-
arithmic plots between the FAR values and the logP figures of the
compounds in series 5–8 did not reveal any correlation (p > 0.05).
The potential of these compounds as MDR revertants will be en-
hanced if bioactivity is displayed at lower concentrations than
4 lg/ml and reversal of MDR occurs in a different species and an-
other neoplastic disease. Consequently, the most potent compound
identified in this study, namely 7b along with its analog which is
bereft of a N-acyl group viz. 4b was evaluated further. These results
are presented in Table 2. A concentration of 0.4 lg/mL of 7b but not
4b demonstrated MDR-revertant properties using L5178/MDR1
cells. In addition, 7b reverses MDR in Colo 320/MDR1 cells while
4b displays marginal potencies. These data confirm the relative
potencies of 4b and 7b and in particular emphasize the potential
of 7b as a MDR revertant.
The MDR modulators are believed to bind to the transmem-
brane domains of P-gp which leads to inhibition of ABC transport-
ers due to the induced conformational changes.25 The functionally
active conformation of P-gp depends on the integrity of the mem-
brane bilayer in which P-gp is embedded. Due to the existence of
12 transmembrane domains of P-gp, the co-crystallization of
MDR inhibitors and P-gp is not possible thereby precluding direct
evidence of ligand binding.
A final consideration which demonstrates the importance of
this seminal work is the very recent disclosure of the excellent tol-
erability of the compounds in series 4–8.29 Thus doses of up to and
including 300 mg/kg of each of these compounds did not induce
lethalities in a short-term toxicity study in mice. A few compounds
were examined at lower doses in rats which also did not induce
mortalities. However, most of the compounds in series 9 causing
deaths in some of the mice and bearing in mind the lack of MDR
revertant properties in general, suggest that formation of further
quaternary ammonium analogs of 9 is not pursued.
In conclusion, this study has identified a novel class of P-gp
associated MDR-reversal agents 5–8. These compounds demon-
strate high potencies which far exceed that of a reference drug
verapamil. Optimal structural fragments in terms of potencies
are the 1-piperidinyl group as the terminal base and 4-methyl
and 4-chloro substituents are present in the arylidene aryl rings.
Series 4 has the general molecular features of various MDR rever-
tants, as well as possessing the 1,5-diaryl-3-oxo-1,4-pentadienyl
group. However, the absence of the 4-(2-aminoethoxy)- phenylcar-
bonyl group attached to the piperidyl nitrogen atom resulted in
compounds displaying a lack of MDR reversal. Development of
one or more of these molecules may produce a single drug candi-
date to treat P-gp mediated MDR cancers and structural modifica-
tions can be undertaken in the future in order to increase potencies
still further. In this regard, various guidelines for amplifying the
project have been obtained based on the physicochemical proper-
ties of these molecules.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
for an operating Grant to J.R. Dimmock. Support was also provided
by the Szeged Foundation of Cancer Research, Hungary to J.
Molnár.
References and notes
A further issue to be resolved is whether the N-acylpiperidones
described in this report are cytocidal to neoplasms which are mul-
tidrug-resistant. Consequently, several representative compounds
were assayed for cytocidal activity towards L5178Y/MDR1 cells.28
The ID50 figures for 6a–c are 3.27, 1.56 and 1.53 lg/mL, respec-
tively, while for 7a–d, the relevant values are 3.28, 2.83, 4.17 and
2.15 lg/mL, respectively. Verapamil has an ID50 figure of 42 lg/
mL. This observation emphasizes further the importance of devel-
oping these cytotoxins, which possess MDR-revertant properties.
1. Dimmock, J. R.; Das, U.; Gul, H. I.; Kawase, M.; Sakagami, H.; Baráth, Z.;
Oscovsky, I.; Molnár, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1633.
2. Das, U.; Kawase, M.; Sakagami, H.; Ideo, A.; Shimada, J.; Molnár, J.; Baráth, Z.;
Bata, Z.; Dimmock, J. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 3373.
3. Leonard, G. D.; Polgar, O.; Bates, S. E. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2002, 3, 1652.
4. Chen, Y.; Pant, A. C.; Simon, S. M. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 7763.
5. Smith, A. J.; Van Helvoort, A.; Van Meer, G.; Szabo, K.; Welker, E.; Szakacs, G.;
Varadi, A.; Sarckadi, B.; Borst, P. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 23530.
6. Limtrakul, P.; Anuchapreeda, S.; Buddhasukh, D. BMC Cancer 2004, 4, 13.
7. Fu, L.; Liang, Y.; Deng, L.; Ding, Y.; Chen, L.; Ye, Y.; Yang, X.; Pan, Q. Cancer
Chemother. Pharmacol. 2004, 53, 349.
8. Beck, W. T.; Qian, X. D. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992, 43, 89.
9. Safa, A. R. Cancer Inv. 1993, 11, 46.
10. Ford, J. M.; Hait, W. N. Pharmacol. Rev. 1990, 42, 155.
11. Pauli-Magnus, C. H.; von Richter, O.; Burk, O.; Ziegler, A.; Mettang, T.;
Eichelbaum, M.; Fromm, M. F. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 293, 376.
12. Wang, E.-J.; Casciano, C. N.; Clement, R. P.; Johnson, W. W. Cancer Res. 2001, 61,
4805.
Table 2
Evaluation of 4b and 7b for MDR-revertant properties using murine L5178Y/MDR1
and human colo320/MDR1 cells
Compound
FAR value
13. Roberts, J.; Jarry, C. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4805.
L5178Y/MDR1 cells
colo320/MDR1 cells
0.4 lg/mLa 4 lg/mLb
2.42
10.8
14. Shen, X.; Chen, G.; Zhu, G.; Fong, W.-F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7138.
15. Chaufferet, B.; Martin, M.; Hammann, A.; Michael, M. F.; Martin, F. Cancer Res.
1986, 46, 825.
16. DeGregoria, M. W.; Ford, J. M.; Benz, C. C.; Wiebe, V. J. J. Clin. Oncol. 1989, 7,
1359.
0.4 lg/mLa
4b
7b
1.00
7.35
1.24
2.49
17. Braybrooke, J. P.; Vallis, K. A.; Houlbrook, S.; Rockett, H.; Ellmen, J.; Anttila, M.;
Ganesan, T. S.; Harris, A. L.; Talbot, D. C. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2000, 46,
27.
a
Verapamil is inactive using this concentration.
The FAR value of verapamil is 3.84 using a concentration of 10 lg/mL.
b