2042
H. Mastalerz et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 2036–2042
Table 5. In vivo antitumor activity of 24 against GEO and N87
xenografts implanted subcutaneously in athymic mice
3. (a) Rusnak, D. W.; Lackey, K.; Affleck, K.; Wood, E. R.;
Alligood, K. J.; Rhodes, N.; Kieth, B. R.; Murray, K. G.;
Knight, W. B.; Mullin, R. J.; Gilmer, T. M. Mol. Cancer
Ther. 2001, 1, 85; (b) Burris, H. A. The Oncologist 2004,
9(Suppl. 3), 10.
4. Traxler, P.; Allegrini, P. R.; Brandt, R.; Brueggen, J.;
Cozens, R.; Fabbro, D.; Grosios, K.; Lane, H. A.;
McSheehy, P. L.; Mestan, J.; Meyer, T.; Tang, C.;
Wartmann, M.; Wood, J.; Caravatti, G. Cancer Res.
2004, 64, 4931.
5. Wong, T. W.; Lee, F. Y.; Yu, C.; Luo, F. R.; Oppenhei-
mer, S.; Zhang, H.; Smykla, R. A.; Mastalerz, H.; Fink, B.
E.; Hunt, J. T.; Gavai, A. V.; Vite, G. D. Clin. Cancer Res.
2006, 12, 6186.
6. Hunt, J. T.; Mitt, T.; Borzilleri, R.; Gullo-Brown, J.;
Fargnoli, J.; Fink, B.; Han, W-C.; Mortillo, S.; Vite, G.;
Wautlet, B.; Wong, T.; Yu, C.; Zheng, X.; Bhide, R. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4054.
Tumor model Dosea (mg kg-1) Schedule % TGIb Pc
N87
30
60
QD · 21
QD · 14
28
51
0.3329
0.0037
0.0001
0.0001
120
240
70
111
GEO
30
60
21
55
71
91
0.3329
0.0528
0.0037
0.0037
120
240
a Vehicle: propylene glycol/water (50:50).
b Percent tumor growth inhibition during treatment. Tumor cells were
implanted subcutaneously in athymic mice and staged to approxi-
mately 100 mg prior to the initiation of drug therapy. Activity is
defined as %TGI P 50%.
c Probability for median tumor weight at the end of drug treatment.
7. For experimental procedures, see: Mastalerz, H.; Zhang,
G.; Tarrant, J.; Vite, G. D. US 6,908,916.
8. Brenner, E.; Baldwin, R. M.; Tamagnan, G. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 937.
9. (a) Fernandez, P. A.; Bellamy, T.; King, M.; Madge, D. J.;
Selwood, D. L. Heterocycles 2001, 55, 1813; (b) Tsunoda,
T.; Yamamiya, Y.; Ito, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
1639.
10. Mastalerz, H.; Gavai, A. V.; Fink, B.; Struzynski, C.;
Tarrant, J.; Vite, G. D.; Wong, T. W.; Zhang, G.; Vyas, D.
M. Can. J. Chem. 2006, 84, 528.
11. Fink, B. E.; Vite, G. D.; Mastalerz, H.; Kadow, J. F.;
Kim, S.-H.; Leavitt, K. J.; Du, K.; Crews, D.; Mitt, T.;
Wong, T. W.; Hunt, J. T.; Vyas, D. M.; Tokarski, J. S.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 4774.
12. Additional cell proliferation data (not shown) using the
HER2 overexpressing BT-474 human breast tumor cell line
and a constitutively activated Sal2 murine salivary gland
tumor that expresses a CD8HER2 fusion protein wer found
to track with these observed for the N87 cell line.
13. (a) Smith, A. S.; van de Waterbeemd, H. In Pharmaco-
kinetics and Metabolism in Drug Design; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2001; p 84; (b) Smith, D. A.; Jones, C. J.;
Walker, D. K. Med. Res. Rev. 1996, 16, 243.
Compound 24 showed acceptable permeability in the
Caco-2 bilayer model (Pc = 64 nm/s) suggesting that
good oral absorption may be achieved in vivo. The free
fraction (fu) of the compound in mouse serum was 2.6%
as determined by equilibrium dialysis at 10 lM. It was
administered orally (50 mg kgꢀ1 dose) to male Balb/C
mice and showed a 4 h AUC of 29 lM h and a 4 h plas-
ma concentration of 5.8 lM. This was about 70-fold
higher than its antiproliferative IC50 versus the N87 cell
line in vitro and therefore it was evaluated in vivo in the
N87 human gastric carcinoma (HER2 and EGFR driv-
en) and the GEO human colon carcinoma (EGFR driv-
en) xenograft models. Orally administered 24 was found
to be well tolerated in both studies; treated animals
exhibited no clinically observable sign of toxicity or
weight loss at the highest test dose of 240 mg/kg. It elic-
ited robust and dose-proportional tumor responses over
the dose range of 60–240 mpk in both tumor models
(Table 5).20
14. Based on pKa’s (H2O) of 8.3 for morpholine versus 10.2
for 1-amino-3-hydroxypropane from: Perrin, D.D. Disso-
ciation Constants of Organic Bases in Aqueous Solution.
Supplement 1972; Butterworths: London, UK, 1972.
15. Wood, E. R.; Truesdale, A. T.; McDonald, O. B.; Yuan,
D.; Hassell, A.; Dickerson, S. H.; Ellis, B.; Pennisi, C.;
Horne, E.; Lackey, K.; Alligood, K. J.; Rusnak, D. W.;
Gilmer, T. M.; Shewchuk, L. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6652.
16. Schrodinger, L.L.C. 2003. 32nd Floor, Tower 45, 120
West Forty-Fifth Street, New York, 10036.
17. Kaminski, G. A.; Friesner, R. A.; Tirado-Rives, J.;
Jorgensen, W. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474.
18. Yu, Z.; Jacobson, M. P.; Friesner, R. A. J. Comput. Chem.
2006, 27, 72.
19. (a) Ballard, P.; Bradbury, R. H.; Harris, C. S.; Hennequin,
L. F. A.; Hickinson, M.; Johnson, P. D.; Kettle, J. G.;
Kinowska, T.; Leach, A. G.; Morgentin, R.; Pass, M.;
Ogilvie, D. J.; Olivier, A.; Warin, N.; Williams, E. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1633; (b) Ballard, P.;
Bradbury, C. S.; Hennequin, L. F. A.; Hickinson, M.;
Johnson, P. D.; Kettle, J. G.; Kinowska, T.; Morgentin,
R.; Ogilvie, D. J.; Olivier, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 4226.
In summary, it was found that pyrrolotriazines with a
basic solubilizing group that is tethered to C-5 via a
methylene ether linkage can show potent, selective inhi-
bition of both the EGFR and the HER2 kinases. Mod-
eling studies suggest that the C-5 solubilizing group may
extend into the ribose-phosphate binding region of the
ATP binding pocket where it can participate in multiple
hydrogen bonding interactions. The lead compound, 24,
exhibited good kinase selectivity, antiproliferative
potency, oral exposure, and efficacy in tumor xenograft
models. This effort was followed by a broader examina-
tion of C-5 solubilizing groups and the results will be de-
scribed in the future.
References and notes
1. (a) Baselga, J.; Arteaga, C. L. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23,
2445; (b) Kamath, S.; Buolamwini, J. K. Med. Res. Rev.
2006, 26, 569, and references therein.
2. Baselga, J. Ann. Oncol. 2002, 13, 8.
20. For experimental details, see Ref. 5.