it is assumed that the same situation applies to the intermedi-
ate sulfinylimines. If this is the case, the addition transition
states are responsible for the stereochemical outcome of the
reaction. During betaine formation there is a preference for
the sulfonium group to be gauche to the imine nitrogen to
enable a positive Coulombic interaction to occur. In the case
of the formation of the trans-aziridine, this will place the
small hydrogen adjacent to the bulky sulfinyl group, but in
the case of the cis-aziridine it places the bulky Ph group
close to the sulfinyl group and so is less favored. However,
steric factors may outweigh electronic factors as Robiette
has suggested in related reactions of N-Ts imines11 and so
formation of the cis isomer may occur via TS-I instead,
which again should be less favored as stabilizing Coulombic
interactions are now absent. This should lead to high levels
of trans selectivity. However, with allyl- or amide-stabilized
ylides the cis/trans ratio was very low. In the former case
this could be because the vinyl substituent is small and both
anti and syn TS’s are equally tolerated, and in the latter case
it could be because the reaction is now reversible. Addition
of amide-stabilized ylides to N-Ts imines has been shown
to be reversible9 and in such cases cis isomers are favored
as the two carbon substituents prefer to be anti to the bulky
tosyl group. The tert-butylsulfinyl group is likely to be of
intermediate size and so may not control the stereochemistry
as well, accounting for the low cis/trans selectivity observed.
The good to excellent diastereoselectivity imparted from
the auxiliary can be rationalized by the established model
for the preferred conformation of the sulfinylimine (Figure
2),12 which has been reinforced by DFT calculations.13 The
Table 2. Reaction of Aminal 4 with Various Sulfur Ylides
overall
trans
dr
cis
dr
entry
R
trans:cisa 13 + 14 (%)
15
1
4-MeO-Ph (9)
4-Cl-Ph (10)
CHdCH2 (11)
CONHPh (12)
CONHPh (12)
4.5:1
11.5:1
1.3:1
43
65:35 >95:5
85:15 >95:5
2
66b
73
3
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
4
1.1:1
63c
45
>95:5 29
>95:5 47
5d
1.1:1
a Overall trans/cis ratios determined by calculation from isolated yields.
b trans-Aziridine 13 was isolated in 50% as a single diastereomer.
c Aziridines were isolated as a mixture of trans:cis 1:4. d Reaction time was
48 h.
reaction time resulted in complete conversion of the trans-
aziridine into pyrrolidine 15, leaving the cis-aziridine behind
(entry 5).
As has been observed with aldehydes,9 ester-stabilized
ylides did not react with aminal 4. Presumably, the higher
barrier to the ring closure of the betaine (relative to aryl
stabilized ylides), coupled with higher stability of the ylide
promotes reversion of the betaine back to starting materials
rather than ring closure.9b
The high cis/trans selectivity observed with aryl-stabilized
ylides can be rationalized by analysis of the likely transition
states involved in betaine formation (Figure 1). It has been
Figure 2. Proposed model for addition of ylide to the imine.
origin of this preference has been attributed to the follow-
ing: (i) the repulsions between the lone pairs of electrons
present on the N, S, and O atoms, (ii) the nN f σ*SO negative
hyperconjugation, and (iii) the intramolecular C-H‚‚‚O
electrostatic interaction (this H-bond is analogous to metal-
oxo complexes with aldehydes as reported by Corey14). In
the absence of metal counterions (which might otherwise
chelate to the sulfinyl group or the nucleophile) this
conformation is also likely to be the reactive conformation
Figure 1. Proposed transition states leading to betaine intermedi-
ates.
established that betaine formation is nonreversible in the case
of addition of phenyl-stabilized ylides to N-Ts imines,10 and
(11) Robiette, R. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2726.
(12) (a) Plobeck, N.; Powell, D. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 303.
(b) Morton, D.; Pearson, D.; Field, R. A.; Stockman, R. A. Chem. Commun.
2006, 1833. (c) Ellman, J. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res.
2002, 35, 985.
(13) Bharatam, P. V.; Punam Uppal, A.; Kaur, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 2000, 43.
(9) (a) Payne, G. B. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 3517. (b) Aggarwal, V.
K.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Fuentes, D.; Harvey, J. N.; Hynd, G.; Ohara, D.;
Picoul, W.; Robiette, R.; Smith, C.; Vasse, J. L.; Winn, C. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 2105.
(10) Yang, X. F.; Zhang, M. J.; Hou, M. X.; Dai, L. X. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 8097.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 11, 2007
2101