LETTER
Synthesis of the PDE5 Inhibitor RWJ387273 (R290629)
711
(6) (a) Willemsens, B.; Vervest, I.; Ormerod, D.; Aelterman,
W.; Fannes, C.; Mertens, N.; Markó, I. E.; Lemaire, S. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2006, 10, 1275. (b) Li, X.; Lemaire, S.;
Markó, I.; Willemsens, B. WO 2006093719, 2006.
(7) Li, X.; Branum, S.; Russel, R. K.; Jiang, W.; Sui, Z. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 640.
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.72–7.64 (m, 2 H), 7.40–7.15 (m, 8
H), 6.90–6.64 (m, 4 H), 5.60 (br s, 1 H), 4.90 (s, 1 H), 4.52
(t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz), 3.90 (m, 1 H), 3.88 (AB, 1 H, J = 4 Hz),
3.66 (AB, 1 H, J = 4 Hz), 3.15 (m, 2 H), 3.07 (t, 2 H, J = 9
Hz). The obtained primary amide (1 equiv) was dissolved in
dry DMF (10 L/mol) at 0 °C. After addition of pyridine (0.7
L/mol), POCl3 (1.2 equiv) was added dropwise to the
reaction mixture. After a 2 h stirring period at 0 °C, the
reaction mixture was quenched with a CuSO4 aq solution
and extracted with CH2Cl2. After evaporation of the organic
solvent, the obtained solid was purified by crystallization
from t-BuOMe to afford compound 4 in 50% yield. 1H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.62–7.58 (m, 1 H), 7.47–7.16 (m,
11 H), 6.84 (d, 1 H, J = 11 Hz), 4.96 (s, 1 H), 4.76 (t, 2 H,
J = 11 Hz), 4.19 (AB, 1 H, J = 18 Hz), 3.60 (AB, 1 H, J = 18
Hz), 3.46–3.20 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): d =
160.4, 137.4, 136.4, 134.3, 131.4, 129.0, 128.6, 128.5, 128.1,
127.7, 126.6, 125.3, 121.9, 119.5, 118.1, 117.2, 110.9,
109.3, 104.8, 71.4, 61.9, 55.4, 48.4, 29.4,25.5. IR: 3388,
2848, 2219, 1612, 1489, 1467, 1453, 1302, 1234 cm–1.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 404.4, 260.1, 233.1, 169.1, 91.5.
(17) Procedure for Compound 5 (1.23 mmol scale).
Compound 4 (1 equiv) was dissolved in EtOH–pyridine (5
L/mol, 2:1) at r.t. Then, NaBH4 (5 equiv) was added and the
reaction mixture was heated to 70 °C for 12 h. A second
portion of NaBH4 (5 equiv) was added and the reaction
mixture was stirred for additional 12 h at 70 °C. After
completion, aq NH4Cl (5 L/mol) and CH2Cl2 (5 L/mol) were
added. The organic layers were separated and the organic
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford
compound 5 in 97% yield; er 95.7:4.3. 1H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 7.56–7.03 (m, 11 H), 6.81 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz),
4.64 (t, 3 H, J = 9 Hz), 3.92 (AB, 1 H, J = 14 Hz), 3.42 (AB,
1 H, J = 14 Hz), 3.35–3.19 (m, 3 H), 3.00–2.61 (m, 3 H). MS
(EI, 70 eV): m/z = 380.1, 355.1, 261.2, 260.1, 184.1, 91.0,
73.1. IR: 3406, 1614, 1488, 1307, 1241, 981 cm–1.
(8) Jiang, W.; Sui, Z.; Chen, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
8941.
(9) Cox, E. D.; Cook, J. M. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1797.
(10) To confirm the stereochemistry of compound 3, the two
diastereoisomers trans-3 and cis-3 were prepared in a two-
step sequence. Treatment of unprotected L-tryptophan
methyl ester with aldehyde 2 leads to the quantitative
formation of the corresponding carbolines in a 45:55
cis:trans ratio. An NMR study allowed the identification of
both diastereoisomers without ambiguity. After separation
by chromatography, each isomer was benzylated leading to
pure compounds cis-3 and trans-3 used as references to
assess the trans stereochemistry of compound 3 obtained
from tryptophan derivative 1.
(11) For the attribution of the cis:trans ratio, see: (a) Ungemach,
F.; Soerens, D.; Weber, R.; DiPierro, M.; Campos, O.;
Mokry, P.; Cook, J. M.; Silverton, J. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 6976. (b) Bailey, P. D.; Hollinshead, S. P.;
McLay, N. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 5177.
(12) (a) Josse, O.; Labar, D.; Marchand-Brynaert, J. Synthesis
1999, 404. (b) For the mechanism: Belleau, B.; Martel, R.;
Lacasse, G.; Menard, M.; Weinberg, N. L.; Perron, Y. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 823. (c) Belleau, B.; Malek, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1968, 1651.
(13) Peng, S.; Guo, M.; Winterfeldt, E. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1993,
137.
(14) Peng, S.; Zhang, L.; Cai, M.; Winterfeldt, E. Liebigs Ann.
Chem. 1993, 141.
(15) Procedure for Compound 3 (65 mmol scale).
In a round-bottomed flask charged with toluene (6 L/mol),
N-benzyl-L-tryptophan methyl ester (1 equiv) and the
aromatic aldehyde 2 (1.05 equiv) were added at r.t. Finally,
PTSA (0.1 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was
refluxed in a Dean–Stark apparatus for 22 h. After cooling to
r.t., sat. aq NaHCO3 (0.2 L/mol) was added. After 15 min of
stirring and then separation of the two phases, the organic
solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The obtained crude
product was purified by crystallisation from t-BuOMe (3 L/
mol) to afford compound 3 in 73% yield. 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.51–7.07 (m, 12 H), 6.72 (d, 1 H, J = 8
Hz), 5.39 (s, 1 H), 4.53 (t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz), 3.94 (m, 1 H), 3.80
(m, 2 H), 3.61 (s, 3 H), 3.19 (m, 2 H), 3.13 (t, 2 Hz, J = 9 Hz).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 173.7, 160.0, 139.7, 136.5,
135.6, 134.0, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 127.7, 127.1, 127.0, 125.3,
121.5, 119.3, 118.2, 110.8, 108.9, 71.4, 60.4, 56.1, 54.2,
51.3, 29.6, 24.5. IR: 3388, 1732, 1601, 1488, 1451 cm–1.
MS (EI, 70eV): m/z = 438.3, 379.4, 347.1, 184.2.
(16) Procedure for Compound 4 (46 mmol scale).
Compound 3 (1 equiv) was dissolved in MeOH–THF (6 L/
mol; 1:1) at r.t. Then, aq NaOH (3 L/mol, 15% w/w) was
added in one portion. After 28 h of stirring at r.t., the organic
mixture was acidified to pH 6–7 and extracted by CH2Cl2 (5
L/mol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 8.20 (br s, 1 H),
7.60 (s, 1 H), 7.43 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 7.21–6.94 (m, 10 H),
6.58 (d, 1 H, J = 14 Hz), 5.22 (s, 1 H), 4.40 (t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz),
3.88 (m, 1 H), 3.85 (AB, 1 H, J = 14 Hz), 3.74 (AB, 1 H,
J = 14 Hz), 3.13 (d, 2 H, J = 5 Hz), 3.00 (t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz).
Then, at r.t., (NH4)2CO3 (3 equiv) and EEDQ (1.1 equiv)
were added to the CH2Cl2 phase. After a 16 h stirring period,
the organic phase was filtered over dicalite. Then the organic
layer was washed with H2O (3 L/mol) and the organic
(18) Procedure for Compound 6 (2.95 mmol scale).
See ref. 5f and 6b: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.63–
7.52 (m, 2 H), 7.25–7.02 (m, 5 Hz), 6.73 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz),
5.08 (s, 1 H), 4.55 (t, 2 H, J = 8 Hz), 3.35 (m, 1 H), 3.12 (t,
2 H, J = 8 Hz), 3.08 (m, 1 H), 2.85 (m, 2 H), 1.80 (s, 1 H).
(19) Procedure for Compound 7 (69 mmol scale).
Compound 6 (1 equiv) was partially dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5
L/mol) at r.t. After cooling at 0 °C, Et3N (1.5 equiv) was
added followed by the dropwise addition over 10 min of
(CF3CO)O (1.2 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (1 L/mol). After a 0.5 h
stirring period, the reaction mixture was quenched with sat.
NaHCO3. The organic layer was evaporated under reduced
pressure to afford compound 7 in >95% yield.1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.90 (br s, 1 H), 7.54 (d, 1 H, J = 7 Hz),
7.32–7.02 (m, 5 H), 6.82 (s, 1 H), 6.69 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz),
4.55 (t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz), 4.08 (m, 1 H), 3.55 (m, 1 H), 3.13 (t,
2 H, J = 9 Hz), 2.98 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 160.5, 136.3, 130.4, 130.3, 128.9, 127.8, 126.2, 125.6,
122.5, 119.9, 118.2, 111.2, 109.4, 109.2, 71.5, 53.6, 45.9,
29.4, 22.2. 19F NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = –68.64.
(20) Procedure for Compound 8 (44 mmol scale).
Confer ref. 6a, mixture of tautomers: 1H NMR (600 MHz,
DMSO-d6): d = 10.94 (s, 1 H, 90%), 10.68 (s, 1 H, 10%),
7.62 (m, 1 H), 7.43 (m, 2 H), 7.30 (m, 1 H), 7.06 (s, 1 H),
6.89 (d, 1 H, J = 8 Hz), 6.73 (m, 1 H), 6.13 (s, 1 H, 90%),
6.02 (s, 1 H, 10%), 4.51 (t, 2 H, J = 9 Hz), 4.42 (m, 1 H), 3.55
(m, 1 H), 3.16 (m, 2 H), 3.02 (m, 1 H), 2.93 (m, 1 H). 13
C
NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): d = 202.2, 168.4, 159.5, 137.9,
136.4, 132.5, 128.0, 127.6, 127.0, 126.7, 126.3, 125.4,
123.9, 108.6, 71.2, 61.8, 44.0, 43.3, 39.8, 39.6, 39.3, 3.09,
29.1.
Synlett 2007, No. 5, 709–712 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York