S. Velusamy et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 3819–3822
3821
Table 2 (continued)
Entry
Substrate
Time (h)
22
Sulfoxide
Yield (%)b,c
Br
12
13
48
S
S
O
Br
S
O
S
23
69
Br
Br
O
S
S
C11H23
C6H13
14
15
21
24
54
40
C11H23
O
S
S
C6H13
O
S
16
17
23
24
62
S
C11H23
H23C11
H11C5
S
O
48d
C11H23
H11C5
S
C11H23
a Substrate (5 mmol), complex 1 (1 mol %), TEMPO (5 mol %) and 30% H2O2 (10 mmol) were stirred in acetonitrile (2 mL) at 20 °C. The identity of
the products was ascertained by 1H and 13C NMR, mass, IR and elemental analysis.
b Isolated yield.
c No sulfone was observed.
d Accompanied by sulfone <2%.
To study the scope of this procedure, the oxidation of
other sulfides was studied (Table 2).9 A series of sub-
strates, aryl alkyl, aryl allyl and dialkyl sulfides, could
be oxidized to the corresponding sulfoxides. The reactiv-
ity and conversion were dependent on the nature of the
substituents. In the case of allyl sulfides, no oxidation
was observed at the carbon–carbon double bond. Simi-
larly, benzylic sulfides could be oxidized to the corre-
sponding sulfoxides without affecting the benzylic C–H
bond. Dialkyl sulfides were moderately reactive provid-
ing the corresponding sulfoxide. These oxidations could
usually be stopped at the sulfoxide stage without over
oxidation to the sulfone.
the presence of 30% aqueous H2O2 at ambient temper-
ature. The addition of TEMPO enhances the sulfoxide
selectivity and yield. From an environmental and eco-
nomic standpoint, this procedure provides a simple
method for the formation of sulfoxides from sulfides.
References and notes
1. (a) Prilezhaeva, E. N. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2000, 69, 367;
(b) Rich, D. H.; Tam, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 3815;
(c) Padwa, A.; Danca, M. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 715.
2. (a) Varma, R. S.; Saini, R. K.; Meshram, H. M. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1997, 38, 6525; (b) Gokel, G. W.; Gerdes, H. M.;
Dishong, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3634; (c) Trost, B.
M.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1287; (d)
Khurana, J. M.; Panda, A. K.; Ray, A.; Gogia, A. Org.
Prep. Proced. 1996, 28, 234; (e) McKillop, A.; Tarbin, J. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1505; (f) Venier, C. G.; Squires,
T. G.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Smith, B. F. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47,
3773; (g) Adam, W.; Hadjiarapoglou, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 469; (h) Breton, W.; Fields, J. D.; Kropp, P. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3825; (i) Madesclaire, M.
Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 5459; (j) Procter, D. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 835; (k) Mindis, A. B. E.; Backvall,
J.-E. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 297; (l) Yamada, Y. M. A.;
Tabata, H.; Ichinohe, M.; Takahashi, H.; Ikegami, S.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4087.
To study the recyclability of complex 1, the oxidation of
methyl phenyl sulfide was examined. After completion
of the reaction, acetonitrile was evaporated under re-
duced pressure to provide an aqueous residue which
was treated with ethyl acetate and water (3:1). The or-
ganic layer, after drying (Na2SO4) and HPLC analysis
(>99% conversion), was evaporated under reduced pres-
sure to provide a residue which was passed through a
short pad of silica gel using ethyl acetate and hexane
to give analytically pure sulfoxide. Evaporation of the
aqueous layer afforded the copper salt, which was reused
for the oxidation of methyl phenyl sulfide in the pres-
ence of 5 mol % of fresh TEMPO and 2 equiv of 30%
H2O2 in acetonitrile (Table 1, entry 5). As above, the
oxidation occurred to provide methyl phenyl sulfoxide
suggesting that complex 1 is recyclable without loss of
activity.
3. Bonesi, S. M.; Albini, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
4532.
4. (a) DellÕAnna, M. M.; Mastrorilli, P.; Nobile, C. F. J. Mol.
Catal. 1996, 108, 57; (b) Sato, K.; Hyodo, M.; Aoki, M.;
Zheng, X.-Q.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2469, and
references cited therein.
In conclusion, the oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides is
described using copper(II) complex 1 and TEMPO in
5. (a) Matteucci, M.; Bhalay, G.; Bradley, M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 235; (b) Gelalcha, F. G.; Schulze, B. J. Org. Chem. 2002,