B. Jagadish et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 3310–3313
3313
2. Handl, H. L.; Vagner, J.; Han, H.; Mash, E.; Hruby, V. J.;
Gillies, R. J. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2004, 8, 565.
3. (a) Mammen, M.; Chio, S.-K.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2754; (b) Kiessling, L. L.;
Gestwicki, J. E.; Strong, L. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 2348.
4. (a) Sharma, S. D.; Granberry, M. E.; Jiang, J.; Leong, S.
L. P.; Hadley, M. E.; Hruby, V. J. Bioconjug. Chem. 1994,
5, 591; (b) Sharma, S. D.; Jiang, J.; Hadley, M. E.;
Bentley, D. L.; Hruby, V. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1996, 93, 13715.
5. (a) Cairo, C. W.; Gestwicki, J. E.; Kanai, M.; Kiessling, L.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1615; (b) Griffith, B. R.;
Allen, B. L.; Rapraeger, A. C.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1608; (c) Li, R. C.; Broyer, R. M.;
Maynard, H. D. J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44,
5004.
17. The ‘low-affinity’ ligand employed was based on the
minimal active sequence for full agonist activity of a-
MSH (His-DPhe-Arg-Trp); see (a) Hruby, V. J.; Wilkes,
B. C.; Hadley, M. E.; Al-Obeidi, F.; Sawyer, T. K.;
Staples, D. J.; de Vaux, A. E.; Dym, O.; de Lauro
Castrucci, A. M.; Hintz, M. F.; Riehm, J. P.; Rao, K.
R. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 2126; (b) Castrucci, A. M.
L.; Hadley, M. E.; Sawyer, T. K.; Wilkes, B. C.; Al-
Obiedi, F.; Staples, D. J.; de Vaux, A. E.; Dym, O.;
Hintz, M. F.; Riehm, J. P.; Rao, K. R.; Hruby, V. J.
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1989, 73, 157; (c) Haskell-
Luevano, C.; Hendrata, S.; North, C.; Sawyer, T. K.;
Hadley, M. E.; Hruby, V. J.; Dickinson, C.; Gantz, I.
J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 2133.
18. The hMC4R vector was originally received from Dr. Ira
Gantz; see Gantz, I.; Miwa, H.; Konda, Y.; Shimoto, Y.;
Tashiro, T.; Watson, S. J.; DelValle, J.; Yamada, T.
J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 15174.
19. Handl, H. L.; Vagner, J.; Yamamura, H. I.; Hruby, V. J.;
Gillies, R. J. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 330, 242.
20. Binding assay: HEK293/hMC4R cells were grown in
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supple-
mented with 10% FBS. Cells were plated in Black and
White Isoplates (Wallac, 1450–583) at a density of
12,000 cells/well and were allowed to grow for 3 days.
On the day of the experiment, media were aspirated from
all wells. Ligands of interest were diluted in binding buffer
(DMEM, 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline, 200 mg/L bacitracin
0.5 mg/L leupeptin, and 0.3% BSA) to result in final
dilutions ranging from 10 lM to 4 pM. Eu-labeled NDP-
a-MSH was used at a final concentration of 10 nM. Fifty
microliters of the ligand of interest and 50 lL of Eu-NDP-
a-MSH were added to each well and plates were incubated
for 40 min at 37 °C. Following the incubation, cells were
washed four times with Wash Buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl,
0.2% BSA, and 30 mM NaCl), enhancement solution
(Perkin-Elmer, 1244–105) was added (100 lL/well), and
the plates were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C prior to
reading. The plates were read on a Wallac VICTOR3
instrument using the standard Eu TRF measurement
(340 nm excitation, 400 ls delay, and emission collection
for 400 ls at 615 nm). Competition curves were analyzed
with GraphPad Prism Software using the sigmoidal dose–
response classical equation for non-linear regression
analysis. Each data point represents the average of 4
samples, with the error bars indicating standard error of
the mean.
6. Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004.
7. Moore, W. R. A. D.; O’Dowd, M. In Properties and
Applications of Polyvinyl Alcohol; Finch, C. A., Ed.;
Staples Printers Ltd.: Kent, England, 1968; p 77.
8. (a) Levesque, G.; Pinazzi, C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1971,
1008; (b) Yamaguchi, H.; Azuma, K.; Minoura, Y. Polym.
J. 1972, 3, 12.
9. Purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company.
10. Isacesco, N.; Taleb-Bendiab, S.-A.; Chatzopoulos, M.;
Montheard, J. P.; Vergnaud, J. M. C.R. Acad. Sci. C
Chim. 1974, 279, 683.
11. In some runs, hydroboration was apparently incomplete.
Hydrogen peroxide converted the remaining alkene moi-
eties into epoxides, which were ring-opened by hydroxide,
resulting in contamination of the hexaol 1 by heptaol and
octaol impurities (from HPLC and HRMS).
12. Shon, Y.-S.; Kelly, K. F.; Halas, N. J.; Lee, T. R.
Langmuir 1999, 15, 5329.
13. Purchased from Senn Chemicals USA.
14. Chan, T. R.; Hilgraf, R.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2853.
15. The ‘high-affinity’ ligand employed here was based on
NDP-a-MSH (Ser-Tyr-Ser-Nle-Glu-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-
Gly-Lys-Pro-Val); see (a) Sawyer, T. K.; Sanfilippo, P.
J.; Hruby, V. J.; Engel, M. H.; Heward, C. B.; Burnett, J.
B.; Hadley, M. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77,
5754; (b) Hadley, M. E.; Anderson, B.; Heward, C. B.;
Sawyer, T. K.; Hruby, V. J. Science 1981, 213, 1025.
16. (a) Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149; (b)
Hruby, V. J.; Meyer, J.-P. In Bioorganic Chemistry:
Peptides and Proteins; Hecht, S. M., Ed.; Oxford Univer-
sity Press: New York, 1998; p 27.
21. Vagner, J.; Handl, H. L.; Monguchi, Y.; Jana, U.; Begay,
L. J.; Mash, E. A.; Hruby, V. J.; Gillies, R. J. Bioconjug.
Chem. 2006, 17, 1545.