Scheme 1. Projected Domino Reaction
Table 1. Scope of Gold(I)-Catalyzed Addition of Water to
Alkynyl Epoxidesa
entry
substrate
productb
1
2
3
4
5
6
1a: R1 ) H, X ) p-MeC6H4SO2N
1b: R1 ) H, X ) o-NO2C6H4SO2N
1c: R1 ) H, X ) p-BrC6H4SO2N
1d: R1 ) Me, X ) p-MeC6H4SO2N
1e: R1 ) CO2Et, X ) p-MeC6H4SO2N
1f: R1 ) SiMe3, X ) p-MeC6H4SO2N
2a (68%)
2b (56%)
2c (63%)
2d (38%)
2e (70%)
2a (50%)
reports have shown that gold salts are a kind of powerful
soft Lewis acid and can readily activate alkynes, allenes, and
olefins toward attacks by a variety of nucleophiles.4,5
Moreover, we have found that gold(I) can also be an efficient
catalyst for the rearrangement of oxirane. (ii) The rearrange-
ment of epoxy group should be suppressed. As we know,
the rearrangement of epoxides with a Lewis acid is a
common method in organic synthesis and has been broadly
studied.6 (iii) Once the catalyst M coordinates to the triple
bond and the epoxy group, the nucleophile should be used
to attack the epoxy group.6a
To probe the feasibility of this strategy, we initially focused
on the addition of water to the N-tethered alkynyl epoxide
compound 1a in the presence of various Lewis acids to
examine the formation of the fused bicyclic ketal 2a (see
the Supporting Information). The reaction, which was carried
out in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) using (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6
as catalysts, gave the best result, and the desired product 2a
was obtained in 68% yield. The structure of compound 2a
was confirmed by X-ray diffraction study (see the Supporting
Information). Under the optimized conditions, the scope of
this domino approach from alkynyl epoxides to fused bicyclic
ketals was summarized in Table 1. Subjection of N-tethered
alkynyl epoxides 1b and 1c to the general protocol afforded
the expected fused bicyclic compounds 2b and 2c in
moderate yields respectively, indicating that the substituents
on the aryl ring did not have significant effect to this
transformation (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). The presence of
a Reactions were conducted with 0.30 mmol of substrate and 0.45 mmol
of water catalyzed by 5 mol % of (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6 in 3 mL of DCE at
room temperature for 48-72 h. b All of the yields given in parentheses are
isolated yields.
an electron-withdrawing substituent on the alkyne appeared
to be more beneficial than the presence of an electron-
donating substituent (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). However,
the reaction could not tolerate the TMS group on the alkyne
in the substrate 1f (Table 1, entry 6).
By investigating the scope of the reaction, we surprisingly
found that the use of O-tethered alkynyl epoxide 3a led to
R,â-unsaturated carbonyl compound 4a in 80% yield instead
of fused bicyclic ketal (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Gold(I)-Catalyzed Addition of Water to 3a
We further tested the cascade reaction of epoxy alkyne
1a with methanol in DCE in the presence of 5 mol % of
(Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6, but the results were not satisfactory.
Gratifyingly, we discovered that treatment of 1a with 5 mol
% of (Ph3P)AuCl/AgSbF6 and 10 mol % of p-TsOH in 3.0
mL of methanol at room temperature afforded cleanly 2,6-
trans-substituted morpholine 6a in 75% yield with high
diastereoselectivity (see the Supporting Information).
Having demonstrated the efficient reaction between epoxy
alkyne and alcohol, we set out to explore the scope of this
cascade addition (Table 2). The corresponding 2,6-trans-
substituted morpholines 6b-d were obtained in 44-70%
yields by using (PPh3)AuCl/AgSbF6/p-TsOH in ethanol,
prop-2-en-1-ol, or propan-2-ol (Table 2, entries 2-4). Aryl
groups with substituents, including o-NO2, p-Br, were
allowed, and the corresponding morpholines 6e,f (Table 2,
entries 5 and 6) and 6g (Table 2, entry 7) were obtained in
moderate yields without the formation of by products. 1′,2′-
Disubstituted epoxide bearing a phenyl group was compatible
with this transformation, affording the corresponding product
(4) For selected recent reviews on gold-catalyzed reactions, see: (a)
Dyker, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4237. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K.
Gold Bull. 2003, 36, 3. (c) Echavarren, A. M.; Nevado, C. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 2004, 33, 431. (d) Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
6990. (e) Arcadi, A.; Di Giuseppe, S. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 795. (f)
Hoffmann-Ro¨der, A.; Krause, N. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 387. (g)
Ma, S.; Yu, S.; Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 200. (h) Nicolas,
M.; Steven, P. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2750. (i) Jime´mez-
Nu´n˜ez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333. (j) Fu¨rster, A.;
Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410. (k) Gorin, D. J.;
Toste, F. D. Nature 2007, 446, 395.
(5) For selected recent examples, see: (a) Brouwer, C.; He, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1744. (b) Shi, Z.; He, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 13596. (c) Guan, B.; Xing, D.; Cai, G.; Wan, X.; Yu, N.; Fang, Z.;
Yang, L.; Shi, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18004. (d) Han, X.;
Widenhoefer, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1747. (e) Ferrer, C.;
Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1105. (f) Genin, E.;
Toullec, P. Y.; Antoniotti, S.; Brancour, C.; Geneˆt, J.-P.; Michelet, V. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3112. (g) Zhang, L.; Wang, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 1442. (h) Liu, Y.; Song, F.; Guo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 11332.
(6) For reviews on the Lewis acid mediated rearrangement of epoxides,
see: (a) Parker, R. E.; Isaacs, N. S. Chem. ReV. 1959, 59, 737. (b) Rickborn,
B. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis, Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation;
Pattenden, G., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter 3.3, p 733.
3192
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 16, 2007