600
KONDRATENKO et al.
3a. The protected glycopeptide (IV) (0.65 g,
2. Glycopeptide (IX) (0.56 g, 0.5 mmol) was treated
0.5 mmol) was hydrogenolyzed in 75% acetic acid with TFA (10 ml) as described for (V) and (X) was puri-
(30 ml) in the presence of 10% Pd/C for 24 h. The cat- fied by column chromatography to homogenous state
alyst was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated. according to TLC; yield of 0.36 g (63%); X). Rf 0.4.
[α]2D0 +49° (Ò 0.02, methanol); IR spectrum (ν, cm–1):
3600–3200 (OH, NH), 1710 (COOH), 1660 (C11=O),
1530 (CONH); 13C NMR spectrum is given in Tables 1, 2.
Found, %: N 2.62. Calc. for C52H76O22N2, %: N 2.59.
The residue was fractionated on a silica gel column
eluted with CHCl –MeOH–H O mixtures at the fol-
3
2
lowing volume ratios: 100 : 10 : 1, 50 : 10 : 1, and 25 :
10 : 1. The homogenous (TLC) product (V) was eluted
with 50 : 10 : 1 CHCl –MeOH–H O mixture; yield
3
2
Compound (XII) was prepared as described for (II)
from C30-methyl ester of GA (1 mmol), HOBt
(3 mmol), DCC (2.5 mmol), and L-Glu(OBzl)-OBzl
hydrochloride in dioxane (20 ml) in the presence of tri-
ethylamine (5 mmol). The crude product (0.78 g) was
hydrogenolyzed in 75% acetic acid (30 ml) in the pres-
ence of Pd/C for 12 h. The solvent was evaporated. The
residue was twice purified on a column as described
above for (VI); yield of (XII) was 0.50 g (37%); Rf 0.42.
0.45 g (73%); Rf 0.45. [α]2D0 +47° (Ò 0.02, methanol);
IR spectrum (ν, cm–1): 3600–3200 (OH, NH), 1740
(COOMe), 1660 (C11=O), 1540 (CONH); UV spec-
trum, [λmax, nm, (logε )]: 249 (4.0); 13ë NMR spectrum
is given in Tables 1, 2. Found, %: N 2.55. Calc. for
C54H80O22N2, %: N 2.52.
3b. The protected glycopeptide (VI) (0.60 g,
0.5 mmol) was dissolved in TFA (5 ml), kept for 30 min
at 20–22°C, and evaporated to dryness with anhydrous
benzene (3 × 10 ml). The residue was purified on a col-
[α]2D0 +38° (Ò 0.028, methanol); IR spectrum (ν, cm–1):
3600–3200 (OH, NH), 1705 (COOH), 1650 (C11=O),
umn as described above; yield of (V) was 0.38 g (69%); 1530 (CONH); UV spectrum, [λmax, nm, (logε )]: 248
[α]2D0 +45° (Ò 0.02, methanol). This sample was identi-
cal to that described above.
13
(3.85); C NMR spectrum is given in Tables 1, 2.
Found, %: N 3.07. Calc. for C53H78O22N2, %: N 2.56.
Effects of the GA glycopeptides on immune sys-
tem of white outbred mice was evaluated according to
a change in the humoral immune response (production
of AFC) by the method of Jerne and Nordin [12] mod-
ified by Cunningham [13] and according to a change in
Compound (VII) was prepared as described for (V)
from GA (1 mmol), HONSu (5 mmol), DCC
(2.5 mmol),
L-Glu(OMe)-OMe
hydrochloride
(2.5 mmol), and triethylamine (5 mmol) in THF (20 ml)
yield of 0.62 g (55%); Rf 0.5. [α]2D0 +43 2° (Ò 0.03, the cell-mediated immunity on the DTH model with the
methanol); IR spectrum (ν, cm–1): 3600–3200 (OH,
use of ShE as test antigens. The examined substances
were intraperitoneally injected to the animals one time
NH), 1740 (COOMe), 1660 (C11=O), 1550 (CONH);
one day after the immunization at the dose of 2 mg/kg.
UV spectrum, [λmax, nm, (logε )]: 249 (4.0); 13C NMR
The number of AFC was determined on the seventh day
spectrum is given in Tables 1 and 2. Found, %: N 2.55.
visually in the whole spleen according to the number of
Calc. for C H84O22N2, %: N 2.46.
hemolysis zones and calculated per 106 splenocytes.
56
The influence of glycopeptide (XII) on the primary
immune response was evaluated according to the level
of hemagglutinines in the mice blood by the method
[14]. An examined compound was introduced to the
animals per os beginning from the first day of sensitiza-
tion of ShE at doses of 10 mg/kg (the introduction for
7 days) and 2 mg/kg (the introduction for 14 days). The
isotonic solution was introduced to control animals. On
the 7th and 14th days of the sensitization, the resolving
dose of ShE at a concentration of 108 was subplantary
injected into the right paw of the mice of each group
(n = 7). Another paw remained intact. One day later, the
animals were decapitated, their blood was taken, and
hemagglutinines were determined in the blood serum.
The reaction was evaluated according the value of
log2 antibody titers.
Compound (VIII) was prepared as described for
(V) from GA (1 mmol), HONSu (3 mmol), DCC
(2.5 mmol), and L-Glu(OMe)-OH (3 mmol) in dioxane
(20 ml) in the presence of triethylamine (5 mmol) in
yield of 0.54 g (49%). Glycopeptide (VIII) was twice
purified by the column chromatography on silica gel
and was homogeneous by TLC; Rf 0.42. [α]2D0 +62°
(Ò 0.04, methanol); IR spectrum (ν, cm–1): 3600–3200
(OH, NH), 1740 (COOMe), 1660 (C11=O), 1530
(CONH); UV spectrum, [λmax, nm, (logε )]: 248 (3.9);
13C NMR spectrum is given in Tables 1, 2. Found, %:
N 2.60. Calc. for C54H80O22N2, %: N 2.52.
Compound (X). 1. Compound (IX) was synthe-
sized as described for (V) from GA (1 mmol), HONSu
(4 mmol), DCC (2.5 mmol), L-Glu(OBut)-Oç
(3 mmol), and triethylamine (5 mmol) in THF (20 ml)
in yield of 0.60 g (51.5%); IR spectrum (ν, cm–1): 3600–
3200 (OH, NH), 1740 (COOBut), 1660 (C11=O), 1540
Effect of compounds (III), (X), and (XII) on the
cell-mediated immunity was studied in the DTH reac-
tion to ShE. The mice were sensitized by the intrave-
nous injection of ShE at the stimulating dose (2 × 106)
and by the subplantary injection at the resolving dose
(2 × 108) of ShE [15]. One day after the last injection,
(CONH); UV spectrum, [λmax, nm, (logε )]: 249 (3.9).
Found, %: N 2.42. Calc. for C60H82O22N, %: N 2.37.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 32 No. 6 2006