Novel Immobilized Oligosaccharides
FULL PAPER
Trans. 2 1998, 2639–2646. For a recent example of highly elab-
orated cyclodextrins, useful for specific oligosaccharide–pro-
tein recognition, see for example: g) N. Smiljanic, V. Moreau,
D. Yockot, J. M. Benito, J. M. Garcia Fernández, F. Djedaïni-
Pilard, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
2006, 45, 5465–5468.
a) C. Baudin, C. Pean, B. Pellizzari, A. Gadelle, F. Fauvelle, J.-
C. Debouzy, J.-P. Dalbiez, B. Perly, J. Inclusion Phenom.
Macrocyclic Chem. 2000, 38, 287–296; b) C. Baudin, C. Pean,
B. Perly, P. Gosselin, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2000, 77, 233–
242; c) B. Perly, C. Baudin, P. Gosselin, Water purification using
cyclodextrins, Int. Patent WO 9818722, 1998, p. 21.
a) P. R. Ashton, G. Gattuso, R. Koniger, J. F. Stoddart, D. J.
Williams, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9553–9555; b) H. Yamamura,
H. Masuda, Y. Kawase, M. Kawai, Y. Butsugan, H. Einaga,
Chem. Commun. 1996, 1069–1070; c) H. Yamamura, H. Na-
gaoka, M. Kawai, Y. Butsugan, K. Fujita, Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 1093–1094.
Synthesis of Support 18: Resin 17, bearing the protected cyclic di-
mer, was then subjected to several tests to optimize the full removal
of the TBDMS groups in the solid phase, varying the solvent, tem-
perature, excess and nature of the desilylating agent. In order to
test the efficiency of the adopted desilylating systems, after each
test, samples (30 mg) of the resins were treated with 1,1,3,3-tet-
ramethylguanidinium 2-nitrobenzaldoximate solution (0.2 ,
500 µL) in H2O/dioxane (1:1, v/v) for 12 h at room temp., and the
obtained eluates were then analysed by 1H NMR and ESI-MS
data. Full TBDMS removal was achieved by suspending the resin
in THF (100 µL) and Et3N·3HF (300 µL, 1.8 mmol, 1200 equiv.)
and leaving it for 12 h at 50 °C. Under these conditions, the cyclic
dimer 1[12] was exclusively detached from the solid support by
benzaldoximate treatment and was found to be identical to an au-
thentic, independently synthesized sample.
[3]
[4]
Synthesis of TBDMS-Protected Cyclic Dimer 19: A sample (30 mg)
of functionalized resin 17 was treated with a solution of 1,1,3,3-
tetramethylguanidinium 2-nitrobenzaldoximate (0.2 , 500 µL) in
H2O/dioxane (1:1, v/v) for 12 h at room temp. The detached mate-
rial, after gel filtration chromatography on a Sephadex G25 column
eluted with H2O/EtOH 1:1 (v/v), was then analysed by HPLC on
an analytical RP18 column (Nucleosil 100–5 C18 Supelco,
4.6ϫ250 mm, 5 µm). By using a gradient from 30% to 100% of
CH3CN in TEAB (0.1 , pH 7.0) over 15 min, flow: 0.8 mLmin–1,
detection at λ = 265 nm, a unique main peak was observed in the
mixture, accounting for more than 90% of the total integrated area,
with retention time 17.46 min. This, collected, gave 2 mg (40%
overall yields calculated from support 13) of pure target compound
19.
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
a) F. Fauvelle, A. Gadelle, J. C. Debouzy, C. Baudin, B. Perly,
Supramol. Chem. 2000, 11, 233–237.
L. Rambaud, J.-P. Dalbiez, B. Amekraz, C. Moulin, B. Perly,
C. Baudin, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1245–1250.
a) A. R. Hedges, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2035–2044; b) B. Perly,
S. Moutard, F. Djedaïni-Pilard, PharmaChem. 2005, 4, 4–9.
a) R. Auzély-Velty, B. Perly, O. Taché, Th. Zemb, P. Jéhan, P.
Guenot, J. P. Dalbiez, F. Djedaıni-Pilard, Carbohydr. Res. 1999,
318, 82; b) R. Auzély-Velty, F. Djedaïni-Pilard, S. Désert, B.
Perly, Th. Zemb, Langmuir 2000, 16, 3727–3734.
a) N. Badi, N. Jarroux, P. Guégan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
8925–8927; b) N. Madhavan, E. C. Robert, M. S. Gin, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7584 –7587; c) A. Mazzaglia, R.
Donohue, B. J. Ravoo, R. Darcy, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
1715–1721; d) M. Wazynska, A. Temeriusz, K. Chmurski, R.
Bilewicz, J. Jurczak, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9119–9123; e)
H. Parrot-Lopez, C.-C. Ling, P. Zhang, A. Baszkin, G. Al-
brecht, C. De Rango, A. W. Coleman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 5479–5480.
a) T. Velasco-Torrijos, P. V. Murphy, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2005, 16, 261–272; b) B. A. Mayes, R. J. E. Stetz, C. W. G. An-
sell, G. W. J. Fleet, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 153–156; c)
D. Q. Yuan, T. Tahara, W. H. Chen, Y. Okabe, C. Yang, Y.
Yagi, Y. Nogami, M. Fukudome, K. Fujita, J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 9456–9466; d) T. Kida, A. Kikuzawa, Y. Nakatsuji,
M. Akashi, Chem. Commun. 2003, 3020–3021.
a) K. D. Bodine, D. Y. Gin, M. S. Gin, Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
4479–4482; b) B. Hoffmann, B. Bernet, A. Vasella, Helv. Chim.
Acta 2002, 85, 265–287; c) L. Fan, O. Hindsgaul, Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 4503–4506.
[9]
Compound 19, Triethylammonium Salt: 1H NMR (CD3OD,
400 MHz): δ = 7.29–6.97 (complex signals, 5 H, aromatic H), 5.17
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H, 1-H), 4.17–3.98 (overlapped signals, 3 H, 4-H
and 6-H2), 3.85 (t, J = 8.0 and 8.0 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 3.75 (m, 1 H, 5-
H), 3.69 (t, J = 8.0 and 8.0 Hz, 1 H, 2-H), 3.21 [q, 6 H, (CH3CH2)3-
NH]+, 1.32 [t, 9 H, (CH3CH2)3NH]+, 0.97 and 0.87 (2 s, 9 H each,
tert-butyl groups of the TBDMS moieties), 0.23, 0.19, 0.17 and 0.15
(4 s, 3 H each, methyl groups of the TBDMS moieties) ppm. 31P
NMR (CD3OD, 161.98 MHz): δ = 2.66 ppm. UV (CH3OH): λmax
= 267 nm. ESI-MS (negative ions): calculated for C48H86O16Si4P2:
1093.480; found 545.42 (M – 2H]2–; 1092.84 [M – H]–.
[10]
[11]
Acknowledgments
[12]
[13]
G. Di Fabio, A. Randazzo, J. D’Onofrio, C. Ausin, A. Grandas,
E. Pedroso, L. De Napoli, D. Montesarchio, J. Org. Chem.
2006, 9, 3395–3408.
We thank the Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR,
PRIN) and the Regione Campania (LR n.5) for grants in support
of this investigation and the Centro di Metodologie Chimico-
Fisiche (CIMCF), Università di Napoli “Federico II”, for the MS
and NMR facilities.
a) L. Moggio, L. De Napoli, B. Di Blasio, G. Di Fabio, J.
D’Onofrio, D. Montesarchio, A. Messere, Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
2015–2018; b) E. M. Alazzouzi, N. Escaja, A. Grandas, E. Ped-
roso, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1506–1508.
a) G. Sicoli, Z. Jiang, L. Jicsinsky, V. Shurig, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4092–4095; b) T. Sukegawa, T. Furuike, K.
Niikura, A. Yamagishi, K. Monde, S.-I. Nishimura, Chem.
Commun. 2002, 430–431; c) S. H. Chiu, D. C. Myles, J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 331–333; d) S. Hannessian, A. Benalil, C.
Laferrière, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4786–4797; e) P. Zhang,
C. C. Ling, A. W. Coleman, H. Parrot-Lopez, H. Galons, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2769–2770; f) P. Fügedi, Carbohydr.
Res. 1989, 192, 366–369.
In our previous paper, we first coupled the bifunctional linker
2-(3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (10) with the 4-phos-
phoramidite sugar building block in solution, and then treated
the resulting adduct with the TentaGel-NH2 solid support.
Here this procedure was simplified by directly attaching bifunc-
tional linker 10 to the resin by classical peptide coupling proto-
[14]
[1] J. Szejtli, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1743–1753 and references cited
therein.
[2] a) G. Gattuso, S. A. Nepogodiev, J. F. Stoddart, Chem. Rev.
1998, 98, 1919–1958; b) C. J. Easton, S. F. Lincoln, Modified
Cyclodextrins: Scaffolds and Templates for Supramolecular
Chemistry, Imperial College Press, London, 1999. There is an
impressive number of papers on modified cyclodextrins recog-
nizing neutral or ionic guests; among others, see for example:
c) R. Heck, F. Dumarcay, A. Marsura, Chem. Eur. J. 2002,
8, 2438–2445; d) B. L. May, P. Clements, J. Tsanaktsidis, C. J.
Easton, S. F. Lincoln, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 463–
469; e) F. J. Huuskonen, J. E. H. Buston, N. D. Scotchmer,
H. L. Anderson, New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 1245–1252; f) J. Lin,
C. Creminon, B. Perly, F. Djedaïni-Pilard, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
[15]
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3849–3858
© 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
3857