Gold(I) N-heterocyclic carbene based initiators for bulk ring-opening polymerization of l-lactide

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.033

Synthesis, structures, and catalysis studies of gold(I) complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes namely, a di-O-functionalized [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene], a mono-O-functionalized [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene] and a non-functionalized [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene], are reported. Specifically, the gold complexes, [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (1c), [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (2c), and [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (3b), were prepared from the respective silver complexes 1b, 2b, and 3a by treatment with (SMe₂)AuCl in good yields following the commonly used silver carbene transfer route. The silver complexes 1b, 2b, and 3a were synthesized from the respective imidazolium halide salts by the reactions with Ag₂O. The N-heterocyclic carbene precursors, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazolium chloride (1a) and 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazolium chloride (2a), were synthesized by the direct reactions of cyclohexene oxide and imidazole with chloroacetophenone and benzyl chloride respectively. The gold (1c, 2c, and 3b) and the silver (3a) complexes along with a new O-functionalized imidazolium chloride salt (1a) have been structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. The structural studies revealed that geometries around the metal centers were almost linear in these gold and silver complexes. The gold (1c, 2c, and 3b) complexes efficiently catalyze ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of l-lactide under solvent-free melt conditions producing polylactide polymer of moderate to low molecular weights with narrow molecular weight distributions.

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.033

Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
www.elsevier.com/locate/jorganchem
Gold(I) N-heterocyclic carbene based initiators for bulk
ring-opening polymerization of L-lactide
a
b
a
a
b
Lipika Ray , Vimal Katiyar , Samir Barman , Mustafa J. Raihan , Hemant Nanavati ,
c
a,
*
Mobin M. Shaikh , Prasenjit Ghosh
a
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
National Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Facility, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
b
c
Received 3 May 2007; received in revised form 13 June 2007; accepted 13 June 2007
Available online 27 June 2007
Abstract
Synthesis, structures, and catalysis studies of gold(I) complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes namely, a di-O-functionalized
[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene], mono-O-functionalized [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imi-
a
dazol-2-ylidene] and a non-functionalized [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene], are reported. Specifically, the gold complexes,
[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (1c), [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl
(2c), and [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (3b), were prepared from the respective silver complexes 1b, 2b, and 3a by treat-
ment with (SMe2)AuCl in good yields following the commonly used silver carbene transfer route. The silver complexes 1b, 2b, and 3a
were synthesized from the respective imidazolium halide salts by the reactions with Ag2O. The N-heterocyclic carbene precursors,
1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazolium chloride (1a) and 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazolium chloride
(2a), were synthesized by the direct reactions of cyclohexene oxide and imidazole with chloroacetophenone and benzyl chloride respec-
tively. The gold (1c, 2c, and 3b) and the silver (3a) complexes along with a new O-functionalized imidazolium chloride salt (1a) have been
structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. The structural studies revealed that geometries around the metal centers were almost lin-
ear in these gold and silver complexes. The gold (1c, 2c, and 3b) complexes efficiently catalyze ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of
L-lactide under solvent-free melt conditions producing polylactide polymer of moderate to low molecular weights with narrow molecular
weight distributions.
ꢀ 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Gold; Silver; N-Heterocylic carbene; Ring-opening polymerization; Lactide
1. Introduction
ited utility in catalysis, has received unprecedented atten-
tion of late [7]. Not surprisingly, riding high on the
successes of N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) in homoge-
neous catalysis [8], the new gold–NHC based catalysts
are spearheading the developments in this field with several
first claims showing up against their names, and thereby
underscoring the new-found role of gold in catalysis. For
example, Herrmann and coworkers [9] reported the first-
ever use of a Au–NHC complex in homogeneous catalysis
in the form of the addition reaction of water to 3-hexyne,
while Nolan and coworkers [10] reported the first example
of a Au–NHC complex for ethyl diazoacetate assisted
Only recently, the catalytic potential of gold has started
to unravel, with a display of quite an impressive range of
transformations emerging by the day that varies from
hydroarylation [1], to C–C [2] and C–O [3] bond forma-
tions, to hydrosilylation [4], to hydroamination [5], to car-
bonylation of amines [6], etc. As a consequence, gold,
otherwise deemed as an unreactive coinage metal with lim-
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 22 2576 7178; fax: +91 22 2572 3480.
E-mail address: pghosh@chem.iitb.ac.in (P. Ghosh).
0022-328X/$ - see front matter ꢀ 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.033

4260
L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
carbene transfer reaction and recently we [11] have
reported the first example of a Au–NHC complex for the
bulk ring-opening polymerization of L-lactide. The neces-
sary motivation for research on the utility of gold in chem-
ical catalysis arises from its low toxicity and from the thus
far unexplored catalytic exploits of gold, which still
remains a challenge till date. Moreover, the strong
r-donating nature of N-heterocyclic carbenes [12–14] facil-
itate tighter binding to metal, thereby imparting greater
stability to the Au–NHC complexes, which generally are
easy to synthesize and convenient to handle. Though new
to catalysis, gold, however, is long known for its varied bio-
medical applications like, antimicrobial [15], antitumor
[16,17], antiarthritic activities [18] and for therapeutic
usages [19], etc.
ing that we have recently reported the applications of
gold [11] and silver [25] N-heterocyclic carbene com-
plexes in the bulk ring-opening polymerization (ROP)
of L-lactide.
Here in this contribution, we disclose the synthesis,
structural characterizations, and catalysis studies of several
gold based initiators, [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(ace-
tophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (1c), [1-(2-hydroxy-
cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (2c), and
[1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (3b), respec-
tively supported over a di-O-functionalized, a mono-O-
functionalized and a non-functionalized N-heterocyclic
carbene ligand for the ring-opening polymerization
(ROP) of L-lactide under solvent-free melt conditions.
Furthermore in this paper, we report the structural charac-
For silver too, like gold, the utility in chemical cataly-
sis is relatively a recent phenomenon, though much more
is known about its catalytic applications than gold
[20,21]. In this context it is worth mentioning that the
Ag–NHC complexes, similar to their gold counterparts,
have played an important role in realizing the catalytic
potential of silver with the Ag–NHC complexes carrying
out many important transformations like, ethyl diazoace-
tate (EDA) assisted carbene transfer reactions [22],
catalytic preparation of 1,2-bis(boronate) esters [23],
transesterification reactions, ring-opening polymerization
of L-lactide [24,25], etc. Apart from catalysis, the
Ag–NHC complexes are however long known for their
role as effective transmetalating agents for synthesizing
transition metal complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes
and have contributed significantly to the growth in this
area [20,21].
terizations of
zimidazol-2-ylidene]AgBr (3a), and
carbene precursor, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophe-
none)imidazolium chloride (1a).
a
silver complex, [1,3-di-i-propyl-ben-
N-heterocyclic
a
2. Experimental
2.1. General procedures
All manipulations were carried out using a combina-
tion of a glovebox and standard Schlenk techniques. Sol-
vents were purified and degassed by standard procedures.
Ag2O was purchased from SD-fine Chemicals (India) and
used without any further purification. (SMe2)AuCl [33],
chloroacetophenone [34] and 1,3-di-i-propylbenzimidazo-
lium bromide [35] were synthesized according to reported
literature procedures. H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were
1
As one of the primary objectives of our core program
is centered on exploring the catalytic potentials of gold
and silver, considered rather unreactive for catalysis, we
became interested in designing gold and silver N-hetero-
cyclic carbene complexes for their utility in chemical
catalysis. In particular, the ring-opening polymerization
of L-lactide is of interest to us because of its eco-friend-
liness as the polylactide polymers (PLA) are biodegrad-
able while the lactide monomers can be generated from
renewable resources by corn fermentation process or
from agricultural starch wastes [26,27]. Furthermore,
the polylactide polymers have found wide utility in med-
ical and pharmaceutical applications because of their
good mechanical strength and biodegradability [28,29].
Our specific interest in the bulk polymerization [30] of
the L-lactide under solvent-free melt conditions, as
opposed to the solution polymerization [31] is due to
the preference for bulk polymerization for the large-scale
production of PLAs. Though a much greater control is
achieved in solution polymerization compared to the
bulk polymerization, the solution polymerization suffers
from certain limitations as owing to their higher reactiv-
ities they are often susceptible to the impurity levels and
to the various unwanted reactions like, racemization and
transesterification [32]. In this regard it is worth mention-
recorded in CDCl3 on a Varian 400 MHz NMR spec-
trometer. 1H NMR peaks are labeled as singlet (s),
doublet (d), and multiplet (m). Infrared spectra were
recorded on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One FT-IR spec-
trophotometer. Mass spectrometry measurements were
done on a Micromass Q-Tof spectrometer. Polymer
molecular weights were determined using a Waters GPC
(Waters 2414 RI Detector) with PL-gel, 5l Mixed-D
(2 · 300 mm) Column, with polystyrene standards in chlo-
roform, covered molecular weight range of l40–4 · 105.
X-ray diffraction data for 1a, 1c, 2c, 3a, and 3b were col-
lected on Oxford diffraction XCALIBUR-S instrument.
The crystal data collection and refinement parameters
are summarized in Table 1. The structures were solved
using direct methods and standard difference map tech-
niques, and were refined by full-matrix least-squares
procedures on F2 with SHELXTL (Version 6.10). CCDC –
607580 (1a), CCDC – 614945 (1c), CCDC – 617398
(2c), CCDC – 616362 (3a), and CCDC – 614944 (3b) con-
tain the Supplementary crystallographic data for this
paper. The data can be obtained free of charge at
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or [from the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union
Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: (internet.) +44-
1223/336-033; e–mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].

L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
4261
Table 1
X-ray crystallographic data for 1a, 1c, 2c, 3a, and 3b
Compound
1a
1c
2c
3a
3b
Lattice
Formula
Formula weight
Space group
Orthorhombic
C17H21ClN2O2
320.81
Triclinic
C17H20AuClN2O2
516.77
Orthorhombic
C16H20AuClN2O
488.76
Orthorhombic
C13H18AgBrN2
390.07
Monoclinic
C13H18AuClN2
434.71
ꢀ
ꢀ
Pbca
P1
P1
Pcab
P21/n
˚
a (A)
9.8239(11)
17.5170(11)
19.2733(12)
90.00
90.00
90.00
9.7287(15)
9.818(2)
10.3135(10)
106.902(14)
98.713(10)
103.817(17)
889.0(3)
2
7.1702(7)
9.440(2)
12.557(3)
103.64(2)
101.692(14)
93.724(13)
803.1(3)
2
10.739(2)
16.0940(8)
16.953(4)
90.00
90.00
90.00
9.624(3)
7.8258(8)
19.292(4)
90.00
100.641(19)
90.00
˚
b (A)
˚
c (A)
a (ꢁ)
b (ꢁ)
c (ꢁ)
3
˚
V (A )
3316.7(5)
8
2930.2(9)
8
1428.0(5)
4
Z
Temperature (K)
293(2)
0.71073
1.285
0.239
27.48–2.11
3294
293(2)
0.71073
1.930
8.434
24.99–3.25
3118
150(2)
0.71073
2.021
9.325
25.00–3.04
2793
150(2)
0.71073
1.768
4.084
25.00–3.16
2574
150(2)
0.71073
2.022
10.470
25.00–3.38
2476
˚
Radiation, k (A)
qcalc (g cmÀ3
)
l(Mo Ka) (mmÀ1
h (ꢁ)
)
Number of data
Number of parameters
R1
203
0.2212
0.2455
1.024
212
0.0236
0.0479
1.045
190
0.0565
0.1428
1.037
158
0.0.346
0.0642
158
0.0577
0.1212
1.086
wR2
Goodness-of-fit
1.106
2.2. Synthesis of 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-
(acetophenone)imidazolium chloride (1a)
2.3. Synthesis of [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-
(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene]AgCl (1b)
Cyclohexene oxide (3.57 g, 36.4 mmol) and imidazole
(2.47 g, 36.4 mmol) were heated at 60 ꢁC for 12 h and the
resulting sticky brown solid was dissolved in acetonitrile
(ca. 20 mL). Chloroacetophenone (5.63 g, 36.4 mmol) was
added to the solution and the reaction mixture was heated
at 90 ꢁC for 2 h. A white precipitate was collected by filtra-
tion and was recrystallized from acetonitrile (ca. 10 mL)
and dried under vacuum to give the product 1a as a white
A mixture of 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophe-
none)imidazolium chloride (1a) (1.50 g, 4.68 mmol) and
Ag2O (0.542 g, 2.34 mmol) in dichloromethane (ca.
25 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The reac-
tion mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed
under vacuum to give the product 1b as a brown solid
1
(1.67 g, 84%). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 8.02
3
3
(d, 2H, JHH = 8 Hz, o-C6H5), 7.62 (t, 1H, JHH = 8 Hz,
1
3
solid (6.75 g, 58%). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
p-C6H5) 7.49 (t, 2H, JHH = 8 Hz, m-C6H5) 7.07 (br, 1H,
3
9.70 (s, 1H, NCHN), 8.01 (d, 2H, JHH = 8 Hz, o-C6H5),
NCHCHN), 7.00 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 5.87 (d, 1H,
3
2
7.59 (t, 1H, JHH = 8 Hz, p-C6H5) 7.46 (t, 2H,
2JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 5.62 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2),
3JHH = 8 Hz, m-C6H5) 7.35 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 7.29
4.21–4.16 (m, 1H, C6H10), 3.64–3.55 (m, 1H, C6H10),
2.12–2.03 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.72–1.70 (m, 3H, C6H10),
1.37–1.21 (m, 3H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 193.0 (CO), 181.4 (NCN–Ag), 133.9
(ipso-C6H5), 133.8 (p-C6H5), 128.7 (m-C6H5), 128.1 (o-
C6H5), 122.5 (NCHCHN), 118.5 (NCHCHN), 72.2
(C6H10), 67.4 (C6H10), 53.3 (CH2), 34.0 (C6H10), 32.2
(C6H10), 24.5 (C6H10), 24.1 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr
pellet: 3440 (s) (mOH), 1698 (m) (mCO). CHN Anal. Calc.
for C17H20AgClN2O2: C, 47.74; H, 4.71; N, 6.55. Found:
C, 47.25; H, 5.39; N, 6.11%.
2
(br, 1H, NCHCHN), 6.18 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2),
2
6.03 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 4.18–4.12 (m, 1H,
C6H10), 3.68–3.62 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.16–2.01 (m, 2H,
C6H10), 1.83–1.69 (m, 3H, C6H10), 1.45–1.29 (m, 3H,
1
C6H10). H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 9.16 (s,
1H, NCHN), 7.55 (s, 1H, NCHCHN), 7.63 (s, 1H,
NCHCHN),7.34–7.32 (m, 5H, C6H5), 5.44 (s, 2H, CH2),
4.10–4.03 (m, 1H, C6H10), 3.69–3.64 (m, 1H, C6H10),
2.15–2.09 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.90–1.82 (m, 3H, C6H10),
1.49–1.41 (m, 3H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz, 25 ꢁC) d 191.3 (CO), 137.4 (NCN), 136.1 (ipso-
C6H5), 134.8 (o-C6H5), 133.8 (p-C6H5), 129.2 (m-C6H5),
128.8 (NCHCHN), 123.9 (NCHCHN), 72.2 (C6H10), 66.8
(C6H10), 55.9 (CH2), 34.5 (C6H10), 33.9 (C6H10), 31.6
(C6H10), 24.9 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3282 (s)
(mOH), 1694 (s) (mCO). LRMS (ES): m/z 285 [(NHC–
Ligand)]+. HRMS (ES): 285.1606 (NHC–Ligand)+. Calc.
285.1603.
2.4. Synthesis of [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-
(acetophenone)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (1c)
A mixture of [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophe-
none)imidazol-2-ylidene]AgCl (1b) (0.362 g, 0.846 mmol)
and (SMe2)AuCl (0.254 g, 0.848 mmol) in dichloromethane
(ca. 15 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 6 h, when

4262
L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
the formation of a off-white AgCl precipitate was observed.
The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was
removed under vacuum to obtain the product 1c as a white
solid (0.295 g, 68%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
(m, 5H, C6H5), 7.00 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 6.87 (br, 1H,
2
NCHCHN), 5.26 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 5.14 (d,
2
1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 4.29–4.23 (m, 1H, C6H10),
3.68–3.62 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.08–1.99 (m, 2H, C6H10),
1.71–1.66 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.53–1.43 (m, 2H, C6H10),
1.38–1.31 (m, 2H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 179.7 (NCN), 152.1 (ipso-C6H5),
135.9 (o-C6H5), 131.7 (m-C6H5), 123.4 (NCHCHN), 123.0
(p-C6H5), 121.0 (NCHCHN), 70.3 (C6H10), 66.0 (C6H10),
54.0 (CH2), 34.8 (C6H10), 29.5 (C6H10), 24.5 (C6H10),
24.0 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3419 (s) (mO–H).
LRMS (ES): m/z 619 [(NHC)2Ag]+. CHN Anal. Calc. for
C16H20AgClN2O: C, 48.08; H, 5.04; N, 7.01. Found: C,
47.58; H, 4.79; N, 6.58%.
3
8.01 (d, 2H, JHH = 8 Hz, o-C6H5), 7.69 (t, 1H,
3
3JHH = 8 Hz, p-C6H5) 7.55 (t, 2H, JHH = 8 Hz, m-C6H5)
7.12 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 7.07 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 5.83
2
2
(d, 1H, JHH = 18 Hz, CH2), 5.69 (d, 1H, JHH = 18 Hz,
CH2), 4.46–4.40 (m, 1H, C6H10), 3.98–3.91 (m, 1H,
C6H10), 2.18–2.02 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.86–1.84 (m, 3H,
C6H10), 1.49–1.38 (m, 3H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 190.5 (CO), 167.6 (NCN–Au), 132.3
(ipso-C6H5), 132.1 (p-C6H5), 127.1 (m-C6H5), 126.2 (o-
C6H5), 121.0 (NCHCHN), 117.0 (NCHCHN), 78.6
(C6H10), 64.9 (C6H10), 55.2 (CH2), 34.9 (C6H10), 32.8
(C6H10), 24.7 (C6H10), 23.8 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr
pellet: 3302 (s) (mOH), 1673 (m) (mCO). HRMS (ES):
481.1201 (NHC–Au)+. Calc. 481.1190. CHN Anal. Calc.
for C17H20AuClN2O2: C, 39.51; H, 3.90; N, 5.42. Found:
C, 39.36; H, 3.76; N, 6.17%.
2.7. Synthesis of [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)-
imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (2c)
A mixture of {[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imi-
dazol-2- ylidene]2Ag}+ClÀ (2b) (0.403 g, 0.509 mmol) and
(SMe2)AuCl (0.150 g, 0.509 mmol) in dichloromethane
(ca. 15 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 6 h, when
the formation of a off-white AgCl precipitate was observed.
The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was
removed under vacuum to obtain the product 2c as a white
solid (0.138 g, 45%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC) d
7.38–7.32 (m, 5H, C6H5), 7.00 (br, 1H, NCHCHN), 6.90
2.5. Synthesis of 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)-
imidazolium chloride (2a)
Cyclohexene oxide (8.20 mL, 88.0 mmol) and imidazole
(6.00 g, 88.1 mmol) were heated at 60 ꢁC for 12 h and the
resulting sticky brown solid was dissolved in acetonitrile
(ca. 20 mL). Benzyl chloride (9.4 mL, 88.0 mmol) was
added to the solution and the reaction mixture was heated
at 90 ꢁC for 2 h. A white precipitate was collected by filtra-
tion and was recrystallized from acetonitrile (ca. 10 mL)
and dried under vacuum to give the product 2a as a white
2
(br, 1H, NCHCHN), 5.44 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2),
2
5.35 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 4.48–4.41 (m, 1H,
C6H10), 3.93–3.86 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.21–2.12 (m, 2H,
C6H10), 1.87–1.80 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.68–1.55 (m, 2H,
C6H10), 1.49–1.41 (m, 2H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 170.1 (NCN), 135.1 (ipso-C6H5), 129.0
(m-C6H5), 128.9 (o-C6H5), 128.6 (p-C6H5), 120.6
(NCHCHN), 118.8 (NCHCHN), 72.6 (C6H10) 67.4
(C6H10), 55.4 (C6H10), 34.7 (C6H10), 33.0 (C6H10), 24.8
(C6H10), 24.2 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3426 (s)
(mO–H). CHN Anal. Calc. for C16H20AuClN2O: C, 39.32;
H, 4.12; N 5.73. Found: C, 39.14; H, 3.94; N, 5.44%.
1
solid (14.8 g, 57%). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
10.1 (s, 1H, NCHN), 7.36–7.33 (m, 5H, C6H5), 7.06 (br,
2
2H, NCHCHN), 5.45 (d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 5.38
2
(d, 1H, JHH = 15 Hz, CH2), 4.34–4.28 (m, 1H, C6H10),
3.67–3.61 (m, 1H, C6H10), 2.14–2.06 (m, 2H, C6H10),
1.81–1.71 (m, 2H, C6H10), 1.53–1.46 (m, 2H, C6H10),
1.36–1.32 (m, 2H, C6H10). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d 136.1 (NCHN), 133.1 (ipso-C6H5),
129.2 (o-C6H5), 129.1 (p-C6H5), 128.9 (m-C6H5), 121.2
(NCHCHN), 121.0 (NCHCHN), 72.0 (C6H10), 65.8
(C6H10), 53.0 (C6H10), 34.4 (C6H10), 31.2 (C6H10), 24.4
(C6H10), 23.9 (C6H10). IR data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3251 (s)
(mO–H). LRMS (ES): m/z 257, (NHC–Ligand)+ 100%.
HRMS (ES): 257.1658 (NHC–Ligand)+. Calc. 257.1654.
2.8. Synthesis of [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]-
AgBr (3a)
A mixture of 1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazolium bromide
(1.89 g, 6.69 mmol) and Ag2O (0.775 g, 3.35 mmol) in ace-
tonitrile (ca. 30 mL) was stirred at room temperature for
6 h. The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was
removed under vacuum to give the product 3a as a white
2.6. Synthesis of {[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)-
imidazol-2- ylidene]2Ag}+ClÀ (2b)
1
solid (1.57 g, 60%). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC):
3
4
d 7.64 (dd, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, JHH = 3 Hz, o-C6H4), 7.38
3
4
A mixture of 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imi-
dazolium chloride (2a) (0.501 g, 1.71 mmol) and Ag2O
(0.199 g, 0.859 mmol) in dichloromethane (ca. 25 mL)
was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The reaction mix-
ture was filtered and the solvent was removed under vac-
uum to give the product 2b as a white solid (0.415 g,
74%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC) d 7.25–7.15
(dd, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, JHH = 3 Hz, m-C6H4), 5.09 (sept,
3
3
2H, JHH = 8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.73 (d, 12H, JHH = 8 Hz,
CH(CH3)2). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
185.4 (NCN–Ag), 132.5 (ipso-C6H4), 123.2 (m-C6H4),
112.2 (o-C6H4), 53.2 (CH(CH3)2), 22.1 (CH(CH3)2). IR
Data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3058 (w), 2974 (s), 2931 (m), 2876
(w), 2730 (w), 2190 (w), 1959 (w), 1918 (w), 1796 (w),

L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
4263
1669 (m), 1603 (m), 1553 (w), 1475 (s), 1461 (s), 1424 (s),
1392 (s), 1363 (s), 1333 (s), 1289 (s), 1230 (s), 1207 (m),
1164 (s), 1132 (m), 1100 (s), 1021 (w), 940 (w), 882 (m),
799 (m), 781 (w), 754 (s), 656 (w), 559 (w), 521 (w). CHN
Anal. Calc. for C13H18AgBrN2(CH3CN) C, 41.79; H,
4.91; N, 9.75. Found: C, 42.74; H, 4.69; N, 9.01%.
non-functionalized, 1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene,
have been synthesized with the intent of designing new Au–
NHC based initiators for utility in the ring-opening poly-
merization (ROP) of L-lactide (Fig. 1).
3.1. O-Functionalized N-heterocyclic carbenes
2.9. Synthesis of [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]-
AuCl (3b)
Both the di-O-functionalized, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohe-
xyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazolium chloride (1a), and the
mono-O-functionalized, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(ben-
zyl)imidazolium chloride (2a), were synthesized using an
epoxide ring-opening reaction earlier reported by us [11]
and by Arnold [36]. Specifically, the direct reactions of chlo-
roacetophenone and benzyl chloride with cyclohexene oxide
and imidazole gave the respective di-O-functionalized 1a and
the mono-O-functionalized 2a imidazolium chloride salts in
ca. 57–58% yield. The formations of the imidazolium chlo-
ride salts wereevident from the appearances ofthe diagnostic
(NCHN) peaks at 9.70 ppm (1a) and at 10.1 ppm (2a) in the
1H NMR spectra while the corresponding (NCHN) reso-
nances at 137.4 ppm (1a) and at 136.1 ppm (2a) in the 13C
NMR spectra. The carbonyl moiety (C@O) in 1a appeared
at 191.3 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum and at 1694 cmÀ1
in the infrared spectrum. The electrospray mass analysis
showedpeaksat m/z 285 (1a) and at m/z257 (2a) correspond-
ing to the individual cationic imidazolium fragments.
A
mixture of [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-yli-
dene]AgBr 3a (0.329 g, 0.848 mmol) and (SMe2)AuCl
(0.250 g, 0.848 mmol) in dichloromethane (ca. 30 mL)
was stirred at room temperature for 6 hours when the for-
mation of an off-white AgBr precipitate was observed. The
reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed
under vacuum to obtain the product 3b as a white solid
(0.266 g, 72%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
3
4
7.66 (dd, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, JHH = 3 Hz, o-C6H4), 7.38
3
4
(dd, 2H, JHH = 7 Hz, JHH = 3 Hz, m-C6H4), 5.52 (sept,
3
3
2H, JHH = 8 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.74 (d, 12H, JHH = 8 Hz,
CH(CH3)2). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz, 25 ꢁC): d
175.9 (NCN–Au), 132.3 (ipso-C6H4), 123.8 (m-C6H4),
113.1 (o-C6H4), 54.3 (CH(CH3)2), 21.6 (CH(CH3)2). IR
Data cmÀ1 KBr pellet: 3058 (w), 2976 (m), 2932 (m),
2877 (w), 1604 (w), 1556 (w), 1478 (m), 1463 (m), 1435
(m), 1418 (s), 1399 (s), 1373 (m), 1311 (m), 1297 (w),
1231 (w), 1174 (m), 1142 (m), 1095 (m), 1025 (w), 936
(w), 894 (w), 816 (w), 749 (s), 650 (w), 548 (w). CHN Anal.
Calc. for C13H18AuClN2 C, 35.92; H, 4.17; N, 6.44. Found:
C, 35.69; H, 3.36; N, 7.14%.
The imidazolium chloride salt 1a has been structurally
characterized by X-ray diffraction studies (Fig. 2). The
˚
˚
C1–N1 [1.312(6) A] and the C1–N2 [1.325(6) A] distances
in the di-O-functionalized imidazolium chloride salt 1a is
comparable to that observed for other reported analogs
like, another di-O-functionalized 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclo-
hexyl)-3-(N-t-butylacetamido)imidazolium chloride [1.326(6),
2.10. Polymerization experiments
˚
1.314(6) A] [11] and a mono-O-functionalized 1-i-propyl-
Bulk polymerizations of L-lactide were carried out in
vacuum-sealed glass ampoules. The glass ampoule was first
charged with monomer (L-lactide) and dried for a period of
2 h under high vacuum at 50 ꢁC. Subsequently, the catalyst
(1c or 2c or 3b) was added keeping with the monomer to
catalyst ratio ranging from 50 to 250. The ampoule was
sealed under high vacuum and immersed in an oil bath.
Polymerizations were carried out in the temperature range
120–180 ꢁC. After a predetermined time (1–8 h) the glass
ampoule was removed and subsequently, the molten reac-
tive polymer mixture was cooled while immersing sealed
ampoule in liquid nitrogen to stop the polymerization
and thereafter samples were removed for analysis. The
analyses were performed on the crude reaction mixture,
no precipitation was executed to avoid fractionation of
the sample in order not to influence the results.
3-(2-oxo-2-t-butyl ethyl)imidazolium chloride [1.320(2),
˚
1.323(2) A] [14]. The \N1–C1–N2 angle in 1a was observed
to be 108.8(5)ꢁ and is comparable to other reported
complexes.
An interesting feature of the 1a structure is that despite
the presence of an OH group in the functionalized sidearm,
a [ClÁ Á ÁH–C] type hydrogen bonding interaction between
R
N
N
N
N
Au Cl
M X
HO
3. Results and discussion
1c
R = COPh (
2c
)
3a
)
M = Ag, X = Br (
3b
M = Au, X = Cl ( )
R = Ph (
)
Three types of N-heterocyclic carbene systems namely, (i)
di-O-functionalized, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophe-
none)imidazol-2-ylidene, (ii) mono-O-functionalized, 1-(2-
hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene, and (iii)
Fig. 1. Silver and gold complexes of di-O-functionalized, mono-O-
functionalized, and non-functionalized N-heterocyclic carbenes are
shown.

4264
L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
O2
is by far the most popular method [21] a few other meth-
ods, although not very common, have been reported for
synthesizing the Ag–NHC complexes e.g. from the reaction
of free N-heterocyclic carbene with AgOTf [39,40] and also
by the reaction of imidazolium halide salts with silver
halide under phase transfer catalysis conditions [38]. Quite
interestingly, there remains more versatility in methods
available for sythesizing Au–NHC complexes than for the
Ag–NHC complexes. For example, the Au–NHC com-
plexes can be prepared by various methods like, (i) cleavage
of electron-rich olefins [41], (ii) carbene transfer from
group 6 carbonyl complexes [42], (iii) reactions of azolium
salts or free NHCs with Au(I) precursors [43], (iv) proton-
ation or alkylation of gold azolyl complexes [44], and (v)
transmetalation via the reaction of Ag(I)-NHC complexes
with Au(I) precursors [38].
C4
C11
N1
C9
N2
C1
C10
O1
Cl1
Fig. 2. ORTEP of 1a with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability
level. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (ꢁ): N(1)–C(1) 1.312(6), N(2)–
˚
C(1) 1.325(6), N(2)–C(1)–N(1) 108.8(5).
the chloride anion (Cl1) and the 2-position imidazolyl
(NCHN) proton was observed, a fact indicative of the
highly acidic nature of 2-position imidazolyl (NCHN) pro-
ton and is further corroborated by the observed high
downfield shift (9.70 ppm for 1a) of the (NCHN) resonance
The 1H NMR spectra of the gold, 1c and 2c, and the sil-
ver complexes, 1b and 2b, are worth commenting on. The
bridging methylene (–CH2–) protons are diastereotropic
in nature and thus appear as separate resonances in the
gold 1c (5.83, 5.69 ppm) and 2c (5.44, 5.35 ppm) and the
silver 1b (5.87, 5.62 ppm) and 2b (5.26, 5.14 ppm) com-
plexes, displaying a two-bond vicinal coupling (2JH–H) of
ca. 15 Hz. For example, similar diastereotopic hydrogens
for the bridging methylene moiety (–CH2–) has been
observed by us [11] for an analogous NHC variant as
well as by Peris and coworkers [45] for Ir complexes
of 1-n-butyl-3-(2-pyridylmethyl)imidazol-2-ylidene ligand.
Quite expectedly, the characteristic metal bound carbene
(NCN–M; M = Au, Ag) peaks appeared in the highly
downfield shifted region of the 13C NMR spectra for the
gold, 1c (167.6 ppm) and 2c (170.1 ppm), and the silver,
1b (181.4 ppm) and 2b (179.7 ppm) complexes.
1
in the H NMR spectrum recorded in non-polar CDCl3
solvent. Evidence in favor of the presence of [ClÁ Á ÁH–C]
type hydrogen bonding interaction in solution further
came from the methanol-d4 1H NMR spectrum of 1a, as
methanol being more polar a solvent would disfavor the
[ClÁ Á ÁH–C] type hydrogen bonding interaction and, indeed,
the imidazolyl (NCHN) proton resonance was found to be
significantly shifted by ca. 0.54 to 9.16 ppm (d) in its meth-
anol-d4 1H NMR spectrum. However, definitive proof for
the hydrogen bonding interaction came from the X-ray dif-
fraction studies. Specifically, the Cl1Á Á ÁC1 distance of
˚
3.386 A in 1a is significantly shorter than the sum of the
individual van der Waals radii of Cl and C (3.45 A)
˚
[37]. However, it is worth noting that in a related di-O-
functionalized 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(N-t-butylace-
tamido)imidazolium chloride [11], also containing a similar
hydroxyl group in the functionalized sidearm, a [ClÁ Á ÁH–O]
type hydrogen bonding interaction was observed with the
The molecular structures of the gold, 1c and 2c, com-
plexes have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies
(Figs. 3 and 4) that revealed the formations of neutral
monomeric (NHC)AuCl type complexes exhibiting the
commonly observed linear geometries at the metal centers
characteristics of the d10 configurations of Au(I) [46]. The
˚
Cl1Á Á ÁO distance being 3.091 A instead of the [ClÁ Á ÁH–C]
˚
˚
type hydrogen bonding interaction seen in 1a. Quite
expectedly, in another mono-functionalized 1-i-propyl-3-
(2-oxo-2-t-butyl ethyl)imidazolium chloride [14] which is
bereft of any hydroxyl group, a [ClÁ Á ÁH–C] hydrogen
bonding interaction was observed between the chloride
anion and the 2-position imidazolyl (NCHN) proton with
Au–Ccarb distances of 1.991(4) A (1c) and 1.987(14) A
(2c) are slightly shorter that the sum of the individual
O2
˚
the Cl1Á Á ÁC1 distance being 3.373 A.
C5
The gold complexes of the di-O-functionalized NHC
ligand 1c and the mono-O-functionalized NHC ligand 2c
were synthesized by the commonly used silver carbene
transfer route from the respective silver complexes 1b and
2b by treatment with (SMe2)AuCl in 68% and 45% yields
respectively. The gold complexes 1c and 2c are sufficiently
air stable to allow manipulations in open-air. The silver
complexes 1b and 2b were synthesized from the corre-
sponding imidazolium halide salts 1a and 2a by the reac-
tion with Ag2O following a procedure earlier reported by
Wang and Lin [38]. Apart from the Ag2O route [38] which
N1
C12
N2
C4
C10
Au1
O1
Cl1
Fig. 3. ORTEP of 1c with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability
level. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (ꢁ): Au–C(1) 1.991(4), Au–
Cl(1) 2.2921(11), N(1)–C(1) 1.344(5), N(2)–C(1) 1.356(5), C(1)–Au–Cl(1)
177.53(10), N(2)–C(1)–N(1) 105.9(3).
˚

L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
4265
˚
O1Á Á ÁAu1 distance of 4.07 A. Similar lack of coordination
from the O-functionalized imidazolyl sidearm to Au was
earlier observed in a related analog [11] and is in accor-
dance with the propensity of Au(I) towards adapting a lin-
ear geometry [46].
C11
C4
It is worth mentioning that compared to the Ag–NHC
complexes [49–52], the gold analogs are relatively fewer
[11,53–55] in number and they exhibit much less diverse
structural motifs than their silver counterparts. Primarily,
the neutral monomeric (NHC)AuX (X = halide) and cat-
ionic [(NHC)2Au]+ type structures are commonly observed
for the Au–NHC complexes [56].
N1
N2
C1
C10
C9
Au1
O1
Cl1
3.2. Non-functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene
Fig. 4. ORTEP of 2c with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability
˚
level. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (ꢁ): Au–C(1) 1.987(14), Au–
Cl(1) 2.294(3), N(1)–C(1) 1.371(13), N(2)–C(1) 1.292(15), C(1)–Au–Cl(1)
177.3(3), N(2)–C(1)–N(1) 106.6(11).
The gold and silver complexes of the non-functionalized
1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene were synthesized
following the same methodology as their O-functionalized
counterparts, i.e. the gold, 1c and 2c, and the silver, 1b
and 2b, complexes. Specifically, the silver complex [1,3-di-
i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AgBr (3a) was synthesized
from the reaction of 1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazolium bro-
mide [35] with Ag2O in 60% yield while the corresponding
gold complex, [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]-
AuCl (3b), was obtained from the silver complex 3a by
the treatment with (SMe2)AuCl in 72% yield (Scheme 1).
The molecular structures of the gold 3b (Fig. 7) and the
silver 3a (Fig. 5) complexes have been determined by X-ray
diffraction studies that revealed the formations of neutral
(NHC)MX (M = Au, Ag; X = Cl, Br) type complexes.
Quite expectedly, in accordance with the smaller covalent
˚
covalent radii of Au and C (2.108 A) [47] and is compara-
ble to the other reported analogous gold complexes
namely, [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(N-t-butylacetamido)-
˚
imidazol-2- ylidene]AuCl [1.969(5) A] [11] and [1,3-bis(R)-
˚
imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl [48] {R = mesityl [1.998(5) A],
˚
2,6-di-i-propylphenyl [1.979(3) A], cyclohexyl [1.990(13)-
˚
˚
˚
A, 1.996(12) A], and adamantyl [1.989(2) A]} complexes.
Interestingly, no chelation from the O-functionalized
imidazolyl sidearm to the metal center was observed either
in case of the di-O-functionalized 1c complex having the
˚
(alkoxy O) O1Á Á ÁAu1 distance of 3.86 A and the (carbonyl
˚
O) O2Á Á ÁAu1 distance of 4.94 A or in the mono-O-func-
tionalized 2c complex that displayed the (alkoxy O)
Ph
Ph
O
O
O
Ph
Ph
N
N
Cl
Cl
+
N
NH
Cl-
Cl-
N
N
HO
HO
1a
(
)
2a
(
)
Ag2O
Ag2O
Cl-
Ph
R
Ph
O
OH
N
N
N
N
N
N
(SMe2)AuCl
(SMe2)AuCl
Ag
Ag Cl
Au Cl
N
N
HO
HO
HO
Ph
(2b)
1c
)
1b
R = COPh (
R = Ph (2c)
(
)
Scheme 1.

4266
L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
two bulky i-propyl substituents, from the reaction of the
benzimidazolium halide salt with Ag2O, the same reaction
with diethyl analog of the benzimidazolium halide salt
resulted in Àa cationic {[1,3-di-ethyl-imidazol-2-ylidene]2
Ag}+AgBr2 complex [38], displaying significant AgÁ Á ÁAg
C5
˚
interaction [d(AgÁ Á ÁAg) = 2.954(4) A]. Contrary to the
N2
N1
C13
different structural motifs observed in case of the silver
complexes, the [1,3-di-substituted-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]
complexes of gold, however, showed a neutral (NHC)AuCl
type structures e.g, [1,3-di-methyl-benzimidazol-2-yli-
dene]AuCl [59] [1,3-di-ethyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl
[59] and [1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl
(3b). It is interesting to note that intermolecular interac-
tions, both AuÁ Á ÁAu and pÁ Á Áp types, observed in the gold
complexes decreased with increase in the steric bulk of the
ancillary ligand, as the [1,3-di-methyl-benzimidazol-2-yli-
C1
Ag1
Br1
C8
C2
Fig. 5. ORTEP of 3a with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability
level. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (ꢁ): Ag1–C(1) 2.093(4), Ag1–
Br(1) 2.4874(6), N(1)–C(1) 1.346(4), N(2)–C(1) 1.353(4), C(1)–Ag1–Br(1)
161.04(9), N(2)–C(1)–N(1) 106.1(3).
˚
dene]AuCl showed AuÁ Á ÁAu [d(AuÁ Á ÁAu) = 3.1664(10) A]
˚
˚
and pÁ Á Áp [ring–ring distance = 3.45 A] interactions, while
the bulkier [1,3-di-ethyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl
˚
showed only pÁ Á Áp [ring–ring distance = 3.53 A] interac-
tion and the bulkiest in the series, [1,3-di-i-propyl-ben-
radii of Au compared to Ag [47,57], the observed Au–Ccarb
distance of 1.972(9) A in the gold complex 3b was indeed
shorter than the Ag–Ccarb distance of 2.093(4) A in the sil-
˚
˚
ver complex 3a. An important difference between the gold
3b and the silver 3a structures, however, is the existence of
the intermolecular AgÁ Á ÁBr interactions in the latter,
resulting in a head-to-tail dimeric {(NHC)AgBr}2 type
association containing a Ag2Br2 core (Fig. 6). The two
equivalent intermolecular Ag(1)Á Á ÁBr(1a) and Ag(1a)Á Á Á
C8
C7
N2
˚
Br(1) distances of 2.8999(5) A in 3a is significantly shorter
than the sum of the individual van der Waals radii of Br
Au1
C1
C1
Cl1
˚
and Ag (3.59 A) [37]. Similar intermolecular AgÁ Á ÁBr inter-
C2
C11
actions have been observed by Lin and coworkers [58]
for a analogous dimeric complex, {[1,3-di-(R)-imidazol-2-
ylidene]AgBr}2 (R = C14H29), with a Ag2Br2 core and dis-
˚
playing a intermolecular AgÁ Á ÁBr distance of 2.9248(8) A
(Scheme 2).
Worth comparing are the gold 3b and the silver 3a
structures with the other reported [1,3-di-substituted-ben-
zimidazol-2-ylidene] analogs. Unlike the neutral (NHC)-
AgBr type complex obtained in the case of 3a, having
Fig. 7. ORTEP of 3b with thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability
level. Selected bond lengths (A) and angles (ꢁ): Au–C(1) 1.972(9), Au–
Cl(1) 2.272(3), N(1)–C(1) 1.373(11), N(2)–C(1) 1.334(11), C(1)–Au–Cl(1)
˚
178.1(2), N(2)–C(1)–N(1) 107.8(8).
Br1
Ag1
Ag1a
Br1a
˚
˚
Fig. 6. Intermolecular Ag(1)Á Á ÁBr(1a) (2.900 A) and Ag(1a)Á Á ÁBr(1) (2.900 A) interactions observed in 3a.

L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
4267
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ag2O
(SMe2)AuCl
Ag Br
Au Cl
-
+
Br
(3a)
(3b)
Scheme 2.
zimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (3b), was bereft of any such
interaction.
Table 3
Melt polymerization of L-lactide by 2c
Significantly enough, all of the di-O-functionalized 1c,
mono-O-functionalized 2c, and the non-functionalized 3b
gold complexes efficiently catalyzed the ring-opening poly-
merization (ROP) of L-lactide under solvent-free melt con-
ditions. It is worth noting that very little is known about
the catalytic utility of gold in the ring-opening polymeriza-
tion (ROP) of L-lactide and in this regard we have recently
reported the first example of a Au–NHC based initiator,
[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(N-t-butylacetamido)imidazol-2-
ylidene]AuCl [11], for the lactide polymerization. Building
upon our initial discovery [11] the current set of gold com-
pounds, 1c, 2c, and 3b, thus offer scope for studying the
effect of functionalization, in the forms of di-O-functional-
ized 1c and the mono-O-functionalized 2c, and also the
effect of modification of the N-heterocyclic ring, in the
form of benzimidazole backbone in 3b, of the Au–NHC
based initiators on the ring-opening polymerization
(ROP) of L-lactide.
Specifically, a typical polymerization experiment would
involve heating L-lactide and the catalyst, 1c, 2c, or 3b,
for a given monomer to catalyst ratio in a sealed vessel
under vacuum at a designated temperature for a specific
period of time. Under these conditions the reaction mixture
would form a monomer melt in which the polymerization
would occur. The variation of the [M]:[C] ratio
(M = monomer, C = catalyst) showed that maximum
molecular weight in case of the di-O-functionalized 1c
(entry 2: Mn = 9.2 · 103, Table 2) and the mono-O-func-
tionalized 2c (entry 2: Mn = 8.4 · 103, Table 3) were
Entry L-Lactide/(2c)
Temp.
(ꢁC)
Time
(h)
Mn
Mw/
Mn
Conv.
(%)
ratio
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
50
100
150
200
250
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
160
160
160
160
160
120
140
180
160
160
160
160
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
8
4.7 · 103 1.25
8.4 · 103 1.16
7.0 · 103 1.15
6.9 · 103 1.17
6.4 · 103 1.24
6.7 · 103 1.13
7.6 · 103 1.12
4.1 · 103 1.34
2.5 · 103 1.18
2.7 · 103 1.14
4.1 · 103 1.26
1.0 · 104 1.20
>99
82
75
69
74
89
86
>99
49
32
10
11
12
94
>99
obtained at [M]:[C] ratio 100:1 whereas for the non-func-
tionalized 3b (entry 3: Mn = 1.0 · 104, Table 4) the same
was obtained at 150:1 ratio for a 4 h run at 160 ꢁC. The
molecular weight distributions are almost similar for these
Au–NHC based initiators, 1c (PDI = 1.16–1.26), 2c
(PDI = 1.13–1.34), and 3b (PDI = 1.13–1.48) [PDI = ploy-
dispersity index].
The time dependence study showed steady increase in
the polymer molecular weight with time with maximum
molecular weight (Mn) observed for 1c (9.3 · 103; entry
12, Table 2) and 2c (1.0 · 104; entry 12, Table 3) after 8 h
at 160 ꢁC while the same for 3b (1.0 · 104; entry 3, Table
4) was reached at 4 h at 160 ꢁC after which it plateaued
off. The temperature dependence study, carried out in
the range 120–180 ꢁC, too, showed similar increase in the
Table 4
Table 2
Melt polymerization of L-lactide by 3b
Melt polymerization of L-lactide by 1c
Entry L-Lactide/(3c)
Temp.
(ꢁC)
Time
(h)
Mn
Mw/
Mn
Conv.
(%)
Entry L-Lactide/(1c)
Temp.
(ꢁC)
Time
(h)
Mn
Mw/
Mn
Conv.
(%)
ratio
ratio
6.3 · 103 1.32
7.4 · 103 1.37
1.0 · 104 1.26
6.8 · 103 1.27
5.8 · 103 1.26
5.1 · 103 1.13
5.7 · 103 1.19
5.8 · 103 1.34
4.7 · 103 1.25
6.6 · 103 1.48
7.0 · 103 1.40
9.2 · 103 1.27
>99
98
90
93
87
37
73
>99
81
90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
50
100
150
200
250
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
160
160
160
160
160
120
140
180
160
160
160
160
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
8
5.6 · 103 1.24
9.2 · 103 1.18
8.0 · 103 1.17
7.8 · 103 1.28
5.2 · 103 1.26
5.5 · 103 1.17
7.3 · 103 1.16
4.7 · 103 1.34
3.7 · 103 1.19
4.1 · 103 1.22
7.3 · 103 1.24
9.3 · 103 1.26
>99
>99
87
78
36
53
59
>99
42
66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
50
100
150
200
250
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
160
160
160
160
160
120
140
180
160
160
160
160
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
8
10
11
12
10
11
12
92
97
81
92

4268
L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
polymer molecular weight with temperature up to 160 ꢁC
for all the gold initiators, 1c (9.2 · 103; entry 2, Table 2),
2c (8.4 · 103; entry 2, Table 3), and 3b (7.4 · 103; entry 2,
Table 4), above which a decrease was observed for all the
three initiators at 180 ꢁC. It is worth noting that similar
decrease in the polymer molecular weight at higher temper-
atures has been earlier observed by Liao [30] and by Alb-
ertson and Varma [28].
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.
2007.06.033.
References
Worth is the comparison of the gold 1c, 2c and 3b initi-
ators with the only other reported Au–NHC initiator,
[1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(N-t-butylacetamido)imidazol-
2-ylidene]AgCl [11]. Quite interestingly, higher molecular
weight polylactide polymers were consistently obtained in
case of both the di-O-functionalized 1c (4.7 · 103 to
8.4 · 103) and the mono-O-functionalized 2c (5.2 · 103–
9.2 · 103) initiators compared to that of the structurally
related [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(N-t-butylacetamido)-
imidazol-2- ylidene]AgCl [11] complex (3.6 · 103–
5.4 · 103) at all the [M]:[C] ratios (50:1, 100:1, 150:1,
200:1, and 250:1) after 4 h at 160 ꢁC. The non-functional-
ized 3b initiator, possessing benzimidzole framework, too,
showed similar higher polymer molecular weights
(5.8 · 103–10.0 · 103) at the same [M]:[C] ratios under anal-
ogous conditions (4 h at 160 ꢁC).
[1] (a) Z. Shi, C. He, J. Org. Chem. 69 (2004) 3669;
(b) M.T. Reetz, K. Sommer, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2003) 3485;
(c) A.S.K. Hashmi, L. Schwarz, J.-H. Choi, T.M. Frost, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 2285.
[2] (a) J.J. Kennedy-Smith, S.T. Staben, F.D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126 (2004) 4526;
(b) A.S.K. Hashmi, T.M. Frost, J.W. Bats, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122
(2000) 11553.
[3] (a) T. Yao, X. Zhang, R.C. Larock, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004)
11164;
(b) J.H. Teles, S. Brode, M. Chabanas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 37
(1998) 1415.
[4] H. Ito, T. Yajima, J. Tateiwa, A. Hosomi, Chem. Commun. (2000)
981.
[5] T.E. Muller, A.-K. Pleier, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1999) 583.
¨
[6] F. Shi, Y. Deng, Chem. Commun. (2001) 443.
[7] (a) S.P. Nolan, Nature 445 (2007) 496;
(b) A.S.K. Hashmi, G.J. Hutchings, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 45
(2006) 7897;
(c) C.F. Bender, R.A. Widenhoefer, Org. Lett. (2006) 5303;
(d) A. Hoffmann-Ro¨der, N. Krause, Org. Biol. Chem. 3 (2005)
387;
4. Summary
(e) G. Dyker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 4237.
[8] (a) R.H. Crabtree, J. Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005) 5451;
(b) E. Peris, R.H. Crabtree, Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004) 2239;
(c) K.J. Cavell, D.S. McGuinness, Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004)
671;
(d) C.M. Crudden, D.P. Allen, Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004) 2247;
(e) M.C. Perry, K. Burgess, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14 (2003) 951.
[9] S.K. Schneider, W.A. Herrmann, E.Z. Herdtweck, Anorg. Allg.
Chem. 629 (2003) 2363.
[10] M.R. Fructos, T.R. Belderrain, P. de Fre˘mont, N.M. Scott, S.P.
Nolan, M.M. D´ıaz-Requejo, P.J. Pe˘rez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 44
(2005) 5284.
[11] L. Ray, V. Katiyar, M.J. Raihan, H. Nanavati, M.M. Shaikh, P.
Ghosh, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2006) 3724.
[12] (a) R. Dorta, E.D. Stevens, N.M. Scott, C. Costabile, L. Cavallo,
C.D. Hoff, S.P. Nolan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 2485;
(b) A.R. Chianese, X. Li, M.C. Janzen, J.W. Faller, R.H. Crabtree,
Organometallics 22 (2003) 1663.
[13] (a) M.-T. Lee, C.-H. Hu, Organometallics 23 (2004) 976;
(b) C. Boehme, G. Frenking, Organometallics 17 (1998) 5801.
[14] M.K. Samantaray, D. Roy, A. Patra, R. Stephen, M. Saikh, R.B.
Sunoj, P. Ghosh, J. Organomet. Chem. 691 (2006) 3797.
[15] (a) R. Noguchi, A. Hara, A. Sugie, K. Nomiya, Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 9 (2006) 355;
In summary, gold and silver complexes of di-O-func-
tionalized, mono-O-functionalized, and non-functionalized
N-heterocyclic carbene ligands have been synthesized
and characterized. The molecular structures of the
gold complexes, [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-(acetophenone)-
imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (1c), [1-(2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl)-3-
(benzyl)imidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (2c), [1,3-di-i-propyl-ben-
zimidazol-2-ylidene]AuCl (3b), and the silver complex
[1,3-di-i-propyl-benzimidazol-2-ylidene]AgBr (3a) along
with an imidazoilum chloride salt, 1-(2-hydroxy-cyclo-
hexyl)-3-(acetophenone)imidazolium chloride (1a), have
been determined by X-ray diffraction studies. The struc-
tural comparisons of the gold and silver complexes
revealed that geometries around the metal centers were
almost linear. No chelations through the O-functionalized
sidearm substituent of the N-heterocyclic ligands to the
metal centers were observed in these gold and silver com-
plexes. The gold (1c, 2c, and 3b) complexes efficiently
catalyze ring-opening polymerization of L-lactide under
solvent-free melt conditions producing polylactide polymer
of moderate to low molecular weights with narrow molec-
ular weight distributions.
_
¨
¨
(b) I. Ozdemir, A. Denizci, H.T. Ozturk, B. C¸ etinkaya, Appl.
¨
Organometal. Chem. 18 (2004) 318;
(c) K. Nomiya, S. Yamamoto, R. Noguchi, H. Yokoyama, N.C.
Kasuga, K. Ohyama, C. Kato, J. Inorg. Biochem. 95 (2003) 208;
(d) K. Nomiya, S. Takahashi, R. Noguchi, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. (2000) 2091;
Acknowledgments
(e) K. Nomiya, R. Noguchi, M. Oda, Inorg. Chim. Acta 298 (2000)
24;
(f) K. Nomiya, R. Noguchi, K. Oshawa, K. Tsuda, M. Oda, J.
Inorg. Biochem. 78 (2000) 363.
We thank Department of Science and Technology for
financial support of this research. We are grateful to the
National Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Facility at IIT
Bombay, India, for the crystallographic results. L.R.
thanks IIT Bombay, Mumbai, for research fellowship.
[16] (a) A.D. Phillips, L. Gonsalvi, A. Romerosa, F. Vizza, M. Peruzzini,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 248 (2004) 955;

L. Ray et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 692 (2007) 4259–4269
4269
(b) M.J. McKeage, L. Maharaj, S.J. Berners-Price, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 232 (2002) 127.
(g) Ph. Dubios, N. Ropson, R. Je˘roˆme, Ph. Teyssie˘, Macromolecules
29 (1996) 1965.
[17] (a) S.J. Berners-Price, R.J. Bowen, M.A. Fernandes, M. Layh, W.J.
Lesueur, S. Mahepal, M.M. Mtotywa, R.E. Sue, C.E.J. van Rens-
berg, Inorg. Chim. Acta 358 (2005) 4237;
[32] D. Garlotta, J. Polym. Environ. 9 (2001) 63.
[33] M.-C. Brandys, M.C. Jennings, R.J. Puddephatt, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. (2000) 4601.
´
˘
(b) J.J. Criado, J.L. Manzano, E. Rodrıguez-Fernandez, J. Inorg.
Biochem. 96 (2003) 311;
[34] M.P. Dave, J.M. Patel, N.A. Langalia, S.R. Shah, K.A. Thaker, J.
Indian Chem. Soc. LXII (1985) 386.
(c) F. Caruso, M. Rossi, J. Tanski, C. Pettinari, F. Marchetti, J.
Med. Chem. 46 (2003) 1737;
[35] H.V. Huynh, Y. Han, J.H.H. Ho, G.K. Tan, Organometallics 25
(2006) 3267.
(d) L. Messori, F. Abbate, G. Marcon, P. Orioli, M. Fontani, E.
Mini, T. Mazzei, S. Carrotti, T. O’Connell, P. Zanello, J. Med.
Chem. 43 (2000) 3541.
[36] P.L. Arnold, M. Rodden, M.K. Davis, A.C. Scarisbrick, A.J. Blake,
C. Wilson, Chem. Commun. (2004) 1612.
[37] A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) 441.
[18] (a) A.A. Mohamed, J. Chen, A.E. Bruce, M.R.M. Bruce, J.A.K.
Bauer, D.T. Hill, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 2203;
[38] H.M.J. Wang, I.J.B. Lin, Organometallics 17 (1998) 972.
´
˘
[39] A. Caballero, E. Dıez-Barra, F.A. Jalon, S. Merino, J. Tejeda, J.
(b) J. Zou, P. Taylor, J. Dornan, S.P. Robinson, M.D. Walkinshaw,
P.J. Sadler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 2931.
[19] C.F. Shaw III, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 2589.
Organomet. Chem. 617-618 (2001) 395.
[40] A.J. Arduengo III, H.V.R. Dias, J.C. Calabrese, F. Davidson,
Organometallics 12 (1993) 3405.
[20] J.C. Garrison, W.J. Youngs, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 3978.
[21] P.L. Arnold, Heteroatom Chem. 13 (2002) 534.
[41] B. C¸ etinkaya, P. Dixneuf, M.F. Lappert, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. (1974) 1827.
´
˘
[22] M.M. Dıaz-Requejo, P.J. Perez, J. Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005)
[42] (a) S.-T. Liu, K.R. Reddy, Chem. Soc. Rev. 28 (1999) 315;
(b) R.-Z. Ku, J.-C. Huang, J.-Y. Cho, F.-M. Kiang, K.R. Reddy,
Y.-C. Chen, K.-J. Lee, J.-H. Lee, G.-H. Lee, S.-M. Peng, S.-T. Liu,
Organometallics 18 (1999) 2145.
5441.
´
˘
[23] J. Ramırez, R. Corberan, M. Sanauˇ, E. Peris, E. Fernandez, Chem.
Commun. (2005) 3056.
[24] A.C. Sentman, S. Csihony, R.M. Waymouth, J.L. Hedrick, J. Org.
Chem. 70 (2005) 2391.
[43] K.M. Lee, C.K. Lee, I.J.B. Lin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 36 (1997)
1850.
[25] (a) M.K. Samantaray, V. Katiyar, D. Roy, K. Pang, H. Nanavati,
R. Stephen, R.B. Sunoj, P. Ghosh, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2006) 2975;
(b) M.K. Samantaray, V. Katiyar, K. Pang, H. Nanavati, P. Ghosh,
J. Organomet. Chem. 692 (2007) 1672.
[26] (a) O. Dechy-Cabaret, B. Martin-Vaca, D. Bourissou, Chem. Rev.
104 (2004) 6147;
[44] B. Bovio, S. Calogero, F.E. Wagner, A. Burini, B.R. Pietroni, J.
Organomet. Chem. 470 (1994) 275.
´
´
[45] E. Mas-Marza, M. Sanau, E. Peris, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 9961.
[46] F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo, M. Bochmann, Advanced
Inorganic Chemistry, sixth ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,
1999, p. 1084.
(b) B.J. O’Keefe, M.A. Hillmyer, W.B. Tolman, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. (2001) 2215.
[47] L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, third ed., Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1960, p. 224, 256.
[27] (a) K.A.M. Thakur, R.T. Kean, E.S. Hall, J.J. Kolstad, E.J. Munson,
Macromolecules 31 (1998) 1487;
[48] P. de Fre´mont, N.M. Scott, E.D. Stevens, S.P. Nolan, Organomet-
allics 24 (2005) 2411.
(b) K.A.M. Thakur, R.T. Kean, E.S. Hall, J.J. Kolstad, T.A.
Lindgren, M.A. Doscotch, J.I. Siepmann, J.E. Munson, Macromol-
ecules 30 (1997) 2422.
[49] K.M. Lee, H.M.J. Wang, I.J.B. Lin, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
(2002) 2852.
[50] Q.-X. Liu, F.-B. Xu, Q.-S. Li, X.-S. Zeng, X.-B. Leng, Y.L. Chou,
Z.-Z. Zhang, Organometallics 22 (2003) 309.
[51] T. Ramnial, C.D. Abernethy, M.D. Spicer, I.D. Mckenzie, I.D. Gay,
J.A.C. Clyburne, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 1391.
[52] A.A.D. Tulloch, A.A. Danopoulos, S. Winston, S. Kleinhenz, G.
Eastham, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (2000) 4499.
[53] (a) L. Ray, M.M. Shaikh, P. Ghosh, Organometallics 26 (2007)
958;
[28] A.-C. Albertson, I.K. Varma, Biomacromolecules 4 (2003) 1466.
[29] (a) M. Okada, Prog. Polym. Sci. 27 (2002) 87;
(b) H.R. Kricheldorf, Chemosphere 43 (2001) 49.
[30] (a) X. Wang, K. Liao, D. Quan, Q. Wu, Macromolecules 38 (2005)
4611;
(b) H. Li, C. Wang, F. Bai, J. Yue, H.-G. Woo, Organometallics 23
(2004) 1411;
´
(c) Y. Kim, J.G. Verkade, Organometallics 21 (2002) 2395;
(d) A.J. Nijenhuis, D.W. Grijpma, A.J. Pennings, Macromolecules
25 (1992) 6419.
(b) P. de Fremont, E.D. Stevens, M.D. Eelman, D.E. Fogg,
S.P. Nolan, Organometallics 25 (2006) 5824;
(c) V.J. Catalano, A.L. Moore, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 6558;
´
[31] (a) J. Ejfler, M. Kobylka, L.B. Jerzykiewicz, P. Sobota, Dalton
Trans. (2005) 2047;
(d) P. de Fremont, E.D. Stevens, M.R. Fructos, M.M. Diaz-
Requejo, P.J. Perez, S.P. Nolan, Chem. Commun. (2006) 2045.
[54] H.M.J. Wang, C.S. Vasam, T.Y.R. Tsai, S.-H. Chen, H.H. Chang,
I.J.B. Lin, Organometallics 24 (2005) 486.
(b) T.R. Jensen, C.P. Schaller, M.A. Hillmyer, W.B. Tolman, J.
Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005) 5881;
(c) M.H. Chisholm, J. Gallucci, K. Phomphrai, Chem. Commun.
(2003) 48;
(d) C.K. Williams, L.E. Breyfogle, S.K. Choi, W. Nam, V.G. Young
Jr., M.A. Hillmyer, W.B. Tolman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003)
11350;
(e) M. Myers, E.F. Connor, T. Glauser, A. Mo¨ck, G. Nyce, J.L.
Hedrick, Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 40 (2002) 844;
(f) B.M. Chamberlain, M. Cheng, D.R. Moore, T.M. Ovitt, E.B.
Lobkovsky, G.W. Coates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 3229;
[55] M.V. Baker, P.J. Barnard, S.J. Berners-Price, S.K. Brayshaw, J.L.
Hickey, B.W. Skelton, A.H. White, J. Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005)
5625.
[56] I.J.B. Lin, C.S. Vasam, Can. J. Chem. 83 (2005) 812.
[57] U.M. Tripathi, A. Bauer, H. Schmidbaur, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. (1997) 2865.
[58] C.K. Lee, K.M. Lee, I.J.B. Lin, Organometallics 21 (2002) 10.
[59] H.M.J. Wang, C.Y.L. Chen, I.J.B. Lin, Organometallics 18 (1999)
1216.