S. Ito et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 10246–10252
10251
2
(7 mL) at ꢀ100 ꢁC and stirred for 15 min. After warming up
to room temperature, the mixture was treated with chloro-
trimethylsilane (1.30 mmol) and was stirred for 1 h. The
volatile materials were removed in vacuo and the residue
was extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer
was concentrated and the residue was recrystallized from
hexane to afford 10b (392 mg, 56%). Colorless powder,
o-CMe3), 111.1 (s, CN), 112.0 (d, JPC¼10.6 Hz, ]CH),
119.3 (s, s, p-C6H4), 122.7 (s, m-Mes*), 128.8 (s, m-
C6H4), 129.5 (s, ipso-C6H4), 132.6 (s, o-C6H4), 139.4 (d,
1JPC¼11.1 Hz, ipso-Mes*), 150.7 (s, p-Mes*), 154.3 (d,
1
3JPC¼3.6 Hz, o-Mes*), 240.4 (d, JPC¼25.0 Hz, P]C);
31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3) d 78.5; ESI-MS calcd
for C27H34NP+Na 426.2321, found m/z 426.2320.
1
mp 151–153 ꢁC; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.19 (9H,
s, SiMe3), 1.33 (9H, s, p-t-Bu), 1.39 (9H, s, o-t-Bu), 1.49
(9H, s, o-t-Bu), 5.74 (1H, d, 3JPH¼12.8 Hz, CH), 7.38 (1H,
4.7. Reaction of 1b with DBU
3
s, Mes*), 7.41 (1H, s, Mes*), 7.60 (2H, d, JHH¼8.4 Hz,
To a solution of 1b (10 mg, 25 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was
added DBU (30 mmol) and the mixture was concentrated
in vacuo. After 2 h, the residue was monitored by 31P
NMR to observe 2b solely.
3
C6H4), 7.62 (2H, d, JHH¼8.4 Hz, C6H4); 13C{1H} NMR
(101 MHz, CDCl3) d 0.52 (s, SiMe3), 31.7 (s, p-CMe3),
4
4
33.0 (d, JPC¼6.8 Hz, o-CMe3), 33.1 (d, JPC¼7.1 Hz,
o-CMe3), 35.4 (s, p-CMe3), 38.2 (s, o-CMe3), 38.4 (s,
o-CMe3), 79.8 (d, 2JPC¼38.5 Hz, CH), 111.7 (s, CN), 119.4
(s, Carom), 122.6 (s, m-Mes*), 127.8 (s, CHarom), 132.1 (s,
4.8. DFT calculations
1
CHarom), 136.5 (d, JPC¼54.1 Hz, ipso-Mes*), 147.6 (d,
Computations were performed with the Gaussian03 (revi-
sion C.02) quantum chemical program package.18 In the
DFT calculations, the functional of Becke3–Lee–Yang–
Parr (B3LYP)19,20 was employed. Geometry optimizations
and harmonic vibrational frequency calculations were car-
ried out with the B3LYP methods using aug-cc-pVTZ basis
set. The harmonic vibrational frequencies of all stationary
points were computed to characterize them as minima (all
frequencies are real) or transition states (TSs; only one imag-
inary frequency). The reaction pathways were verified by
IRC calculations.
3JPC¼11.1 Hz, Carom), 151.5 (s, p-Mes*), 153.4 (d,
2
2JPC¼2.3 Hz, o-Mes*), 153.9 (d, JPC¼2.3 Hz, o-Mes*),
1
165.8 (d, JPC¼64.0 Hz, P]C); 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz,
CDCl3) d 258.1; ESI-MS calcd for C30H4379BrNPOSi+Na
594.1927, found m/z 594.1925. Elemental analysis (%) calcd
for C27H35BrNPOSi (572.63) C 62.92, H 7.57, N 2.45; found
C 63.14, H 7.41, N 2.45.
4.6. Preparation of 3b and 1b
To a solution of 10b (0.165 mg, 0.288 mmol) in THF
(10 mL) was added butyllithium (0.588 mmol) at ꢀ100 ꢁC
and the mixture was stirred for 15 min. Subsequently 1,2-di-
bromoethane (0.14 mmol) was added to the reaction mix-
ture. The mixture was allowed to warm up to room
temperature and stirred for 4 h. The volatile materials were
removed in vacuo and the residue was extracted with di-
chloromethane. The organic layer was concentrated in vacuo
and the residue was washed with hexane to give 3b (60 mg,
52%). The hexane solution was concentrated and the residue
was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, hexane/
EtOAc 100:1) to give 1b (14 mg, 12%). 3b: yellow powder
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scien-
tific Research (Nos. 13303039 and 14044012) from the Min-
istry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology,
Japan, and the Program Research, Center for Interdisciplin-
ary Research, Tohoku University. The authors would like to
express their gratitude to the crew for the support of super-
computers at the Institute for Material Research, Tohoku
University. One of the authors (S.I.) acknowledges the Sup-
port for Young Researchers, Graduate School of Science,
Tohoku University.
1
(hexane), mp 297–300 ꢁC (decomp.); H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) d 1.40 (18H, s, p-t-Bu), 1.53 (36H, s, o-t-Bu), 6.56
(4H, d, JHH¼8.3 Hz, C6H4), 7.10 (4H, d, JHH¼8.3 Hz,
3
3
C6H4), 7.35 (4H, s, Mes*); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz,
4
CDCl3) d 32.0 (s, p-CMe3), 33.7 (d, JPC¼2.0 Hz, o-
Supplementary data
CMe3), 35.6 (s, p-CMe3), 38.7 (s, o-CMe3), 111.6 (s, CN),
118.8 (s, CHarom), 122.4 (s, m-Mes*), 128.7 (s, Carom),
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
1
131.9 (s, CHarom), 134.6 (d, JPC¼27.1 Hz, ipso-Mes*),
136.1 (s, Carom), 151.4 (s, p-Mes*), 153.3 (pt, (2JPC+3JPC)/
2¼6.8 Hz, C]C), 155.4 (s, o-Mes*), 174.7 (dd,
1JPC¼17.2, 8.7 Hz, P]C); 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz,
CDCl3) d 187.4; EI-MS m/z (rel intensity) 804 (M+;
100%); ESI-MS calcd for C54H66P2+Na 827.4593, found
m/z 827.4591; calcd for C27H34NP+Na+4O 891.4390, found
m/z 891.4381. Elemental analysis (%) calcd for
C54H66N2P2+2O2 (869.06) C 74.63, H 7.65, N 3.22; found
C 74.18, H 7.90, N 3.40. 1b: Colorless solid, mp 140–
References and notes
1. Phosphorus–Carbon Heterocyclic Chemistry: The Rise of
a New Domain; Mathey, F., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2001.
ꢀ
2. Baumgartner, T.; Reau, R. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4681.
3. (a) Yoshifuji, M.; Shima, I.; Inamoto, N.; Hirotsu, K.; Higuchi,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4587; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 6167; (b) Multiple Bonds and Low Coordination in
Phosphorus Chemistry; Regitz, M., Scherer, O. J., Eds.;
Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, 1990; (c) Dillon, K. B.; Mathey, F.;
Nixon, J. F. Phosphorus: The Carbon Copy; Wiley:
Chichester, UK, 1998; (d) Weber, L. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1839;
(e) Power, P. P. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3463; (f) Tokitoh, N.
1
143 ꢁC; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.31 (9H, s, p-t-
3
Bu), 1.64 (18H, s, o-t-Bu), 6.64 (1H, d, JPH¼26.4 Hz,
3
]CH), 7.37 (2H, d, JHH¼8.3 Hz, C6H4), 7.41 (2H, d,
3
4JPH¼1.8 Hz, Mes*), 7.55 (2H, d, JHH¼8.3 Hz, C6H4);
13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) d 31.7 (s, p-CMe3),
4
33.8 (d, JPC¼7.0 Hz, o-CMe3), 35.4 (s, p-CMe3), 38.4 (s,