10.1002/cbic.202000773
ChemBioChem
FULL PAPER
triethylamine (300 mL, 2.15 mmol, 1 equiv.). The reaction mixture was
stirred vigorously overnight at room temperature, diluted with deionized
water (15 mL), and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 50 mL). The combined
organic phases were washed successively with saturated sodium
bicarbonate and brine solutions (30 mL each), dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo by rotary evaporation. Flash
silica chromatography (4:1 ethyl acetate/hexanes, visualized by UV and
ninhydrin staining) afforded the desired synthetic AHL in moderate yield as
a white solid.
Compound 3 was prepared by charging a round-bottomed flask in an
ice-water bath with freshly synthesized homoserine lactone hydrochloride
(275 mg, 2 mmol), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (380
mg, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.), and 3-indolebutyric acid (410 mg, 2 mmol, 1 equiv.).
To these solids were added dichloromethane (15 mL) and triethylamine
(580 mL, 4 mmol, 2 equiv.). The reaction mixture was warmed to room
temperature and vigorously stirred overnight, then diluted with ethyl
acetate (30 mL) and extracted with deionized water (30 mL). The aqueous
phase was further extracted with ethyl acetate (2 x 30 mL). The combined
organic layers were washed successively with saturated sodium
bicarbonate and brine solutions (30 mL each), dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo by rotary evaporation. Flash
chromatography (4:1 ethyl acetate/hexanes, visualized by UV and
ninhydrin staining) afforded 3 as a white solid.
Binding Constant Determination.
Methanolic stock solutions of AHLs 1, 2, and 3 were prepared and
subsequently diluted with PBS (pH 7.3) to 90 M, 145 M, and 435 M,
respectively ([MeOH] = 2% v/v). An aqueous -CD stock (10.6 mM) was
prepared by dissolving the macrocycle in PBS. For binding constant
determination studies, 100 L aliquots of aqueous AHL stock solution were
transferred into 5 mL volumetric flasks charged with varying amounts of -
CD stock solution and filled to the mark with PBS ([MeOH] < 0.04% v/v).
Solutions were inverted and left to equilibrate for 15 minutes prior to
performing fluorescence measurements.
For 1, the excitation and emission wavelengths were selected to be 254
nm and 315 nm. For 2, the excitation and emission wavelengths were
selected to be 277 nm and 334 nm. For 3, the excitation and emission
wavelengths were selected to be 280 nm and 360 nm. All spectra were
collected with increments of 1 nm, integration times of 0.05 sec, and
bandwidths (both emission and excitation) of 3 nm.
Association constants were initially determined by application of the
Benesi-Hildebrand equation (Equation 1), which suggested
a 1:1
host/guest complex stoichiometry by a linear double-reciprocal plot. Here,
I indicates the intensity of a given solution, I0 is the intensity of the solution
without CD present, [CD] denotes the total concentration of CD present in
solution, complex denotes the change between a fluorescence quantum
efficiency factor of the free and bound fluorophore, and Kbind denotes the
binding constant.
N-(4-biphenyl)acetyl-L-homoserine lactone (1):
1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3, ): 7.62-7.56 (4H), 7.48-7.42 (2H), 7.39-7.32
(3H), 6.05 (1H, d, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.54 (1H, ddd, J = 11.6, 8.7, 6.0 Hz), 4.44
(1H, ddd, J = 9.0, 9.0, 0.9 Hz), 4.26 (1H, ddd, J = 11.2, 9.3, 6.0 Hz), 3.67
(2H, s), 2.81 (1H, dddd, J = 12.7, 8.4, 5.9, 1.1 Hz), 2.12 (1H, dddd, J =
12.4, 11.5, 11.5, 8.9 Hz); 13C-NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3, ): 175.22, 171.62,
140.66, 140.61, 133.11, 129.98, 128.96, 127.96, 127.59, 127.19, 66.15,
49.54, 43.02, 30.43; Melting Point: 173-175 C; Mass (m/z, [M+Na]+):
(theor.) 318.11061, (found) 318.1115; Yield: 65%.
1
1
1
=
+
(1)
[
]
퐶퐷 ∆휙푐표푚푝푙푒푥 퐾푏푖푛푑 ∆휙푐표푚푝푙푒푥
퐼 − 퐼0
However, to overcome the limitations posed and circumvent assumptions
made by the Benesi-Hildebrand method, we fitted the data using non-linear
regression (NLR).
Briefly, at low enough concentrations (i.e., A()<0.05), the fluorescence
(F) of a solution can be thought of as the sum of the individual components
in that solution multiplied by that component’s “fluorescence efficiency
factor,” , which is proportional to its fluorescence quantum yield.
Assuming the macrocycle’s fluorescence is trivial, the fluorescence can be
written as a function of total guest concentration (G0, known) and the
concentration of the host:guest complex ([HG], unknowable given an
unknown association constant).
N-(2-naphthalene)acetyl-L-homoserine lactone (2):
1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3, ): 7.87 (3H), 7.74 (1H, s), 7.53-7.46 (2H, ‘dd’),
7.39 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.7 Hz), 6.00 (1H, d, NH, J = 4.2 Hz), 4.51 (1H, ddd,
J = 11.6, 8.6, 6.1 Hz), 4.41 (1H, ddd, J = 9.2, 8.9, 0.6 Hz), 4.23 (1H, ddd,
J = 11.1, 9.3, 6.0 Hz), 3.79 (2H, s), 2.76 (1H, dddd, J = 12.7, 8.5, 5.9, 1.2
Hz), 2.08 (1H, dddd, J = 12.3, 11.4, 11.4, 9.0 Hz); 13C-NMR (100 MHz;
CDCl3, ): 175.13, 171.62, 133.71, 132.78, 131.64, 129.13, 128.52, 127.91,
127.86, 127.27, 126.67, 126.35, 66.11, 49.49, 43.62, 30.34; Melting Point:
193-195 C; Mass (m/z, [M+Na]+): (theor.) 292.0956, (found) 292.09496;
Yield: 39%.
[
]
[
]
퐹 = 퐺 휙퐺 + 퐻퐺 휙퐻퐺
(2)
(3)
(
[
])
[
]
퐹 = 퐺0 − 퐻퐺 휙퐺 + 퐻퐺 휙퐻퐺
N-(3-indole)butyryl-L-homoserine lactone (3):
1H-NMR (400 MHz; MeOD-d4, ): 7.53 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.31 (1H, d, J
= 8.1 Hz), 7.07 (1H, “t”), 7.03 (1H, s), 6.98 (1H, “t”) 4.58 (1H, dd, J = 10.8,
9.3 Hz), 4.41 (1H, td, J = 9.0, 1.8 Hz), 4.27 (1H, ddd, J = 10.4, 9.1, 6.6 Hz),
2.8 (2H, t, J = 7.4 Hz), 2.51 (1H, dddd, J = 12.3, 9.0, 6.7, 2.1 Hz), 2.30
(2H,t, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.23 (1H, dddd, J = 12.1, 10.7, 10.7, 9.3 Hz), 2.02 (2H,
p, J = 7.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (100 MHz; MeOD-d4, ):177.63, 176.45, 138.39,
128.94, 123.22, 119.56, 119.56, 115.75, 112.28, 67.30, 50.02, 36.52,
29.76, 27.65, 25.66. Melting Point: 63-65 C; Mass (m/z, [M+Na]+: (theor.)
309.12151, (found) 309.1221; Yield: 50%.
The concentration of the host:guest complex can rarely be known
experimentally; however, it can be written as a solution to the quadratic
equation resulting from the definition of the 1:1 host:guest association
constant Kbind, where [H] and [G] are the free host and guest
concentrations, respectively.
[
]
퐻퐺
퐾푏푖푛푑
=
(4)
[
][
]
퐻
퐺
[
]
퐻퐺
N-(3-phenylpropanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone (4):
1H-NMR (400 MHz; CDCl3, ): 7.32-7.25 (2H), 7.24-7.16 (3H), 6.07 (1H, d,
NH, J = 4.2 Hz), 4.53 (1H, ddd, J = 11.5, 8.5, 6.1 Hz), 4.43 (1H, t, J = 8.9
Hz), 4.26 (1H, ddd, J = 11.1, 9.4, 5.9 Hz), 2.97 (2H, t, ABX2, JAX = JBX
7.7 Hz), 2.78 (1H, dddd, J = 12.6, 8.3, 5.9, 1.0 Hz), 2.58 (1H, ABX2, JAB
퐾푏푖푛푑
=
(
[
])(
[
])
퐻0 − 퐻퐺 퐺0 − 퐻퐺
1
퐻퐺 2 − (퐻0 + 퐺0 +
) 퐻퐺 + 퐻0퐺0 = 0
[
]
[
]
퐾푏푖푛푑
=
=
14.9 Hz, JAX2 = 7.6), 2.53 (1H, ABX2, JAB = 14.9 Hz, JBX2 = 8.0 Hz), 2.03
(1H, dddd, J = 11.8, 11.8, 11.8, 9.1 Hz); 13C-NMR (100 MHz; CDCl3, ):
175.60, 172.87, 140.64, 128.78, 128.55, 126.58, 66.27, 49.42, 38.06,
31.62, 30.64; Melting Point:146-148 C; Mass (m/z, [M+Na]+): (theor.)
256.09496, (found) 256.0959; Yield: 44 %.
(5)
1
1
[
]
퐻퐺
=
((퐻0 + 퐺0 +
)
2
1
2
퐾푏푖푛푑
√
−
(퐻0 + 퐺0 +
) − 4퐻0퐺0)
퐾푏푖푛푑
Fitting the fluorescence data using Equations 3 and 5, optimized using the
Simplex algorithm on PSI-PLOT software, afforded the association
8
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.