Antioxidants of Supersweet Corn Powder
1795
the same condition was continued until 100 min. Detection was at an
absorbance of 250 nm. The eluate was collected at 8-min intervals by
dividing it into 11 fractions. Each fraction was dried, dissolved in
3.0 ml of 80% ethanol, and used as a sample to measure the DPPH
radical-scavenging activity.
H
H
COOH
COOH
O
O
N
H
N
H
R
R
HPLC-MS analysis. Ten microliters of the SSCP extract was eluted
at 30 ꢁC, using HPLC with a COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II column
(ꢁ4:6 ꢂ 250 mm, Nacalai Tesque). Elution was performed employing
a linear gradient, with a flow velocity of 0.3 ml/min. We employed
solutions A (0.1% formic acid) and B (70% methanol and 0.1% formic
acid), with the initial concentration of solution A set as 100%. Gradient
elution was started after 15 min, using respective concentrations of
solution A 30, 50, 65, 100, 135, and 160 min after the start of elution of
90, 80, 70, 60, 40, and 0%. This 0% condition was continued until
175 min. Detection was performed with a Micromass Quattro micro
API mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) in the
positive-ion electrospray mode. A drying nitrogen gas temperature of
300 ꢁC, drying gas flow rate of 10 l/min, fragmentation voltage of
20 V, and capillary voltage of +4,600 V were used.
GOA: R = O-β-D-glucose
HOA: R = OH
Fig. 1. Structures of GOA and HOA.
The two-headed arrow indicates the equilibrium of two stereo-
isomers.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), L-ascorbic acid,
Trolox, ferulic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). ꢀ-Glucosidase was
purchased from Oriental Yeast Co. (Tokyo, Japan), and thiobarbituric
acid was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka,
Japan).
Purification of the antioxidative substances. SSCP (36 g) was
extracted twice with 90 ml of 80% ethanol, and the liquid extract was
dried by using a concentrating centrifuge. The dried extract was
dissolved in methanol, and the target fraction was collected by
conducting HPLC several times on 30 ml of the extract eluted at room
temperature by HPLC with a CAPSELPAK C18 UG80 column
(ꢁ20 ꢂ 250 mm, Shiseido Co., Tokyo, Japan). Elution was performed
at a flow velocity of 6 ml/min for 30 min, employing 25% methanol
and 0.1% formic acid as vehicles. The next sample was then injected.
The target fraction was collected, dried by using the concentrating
centrifuge, and dissolved in a small volume of methanol. The dried
sample was subsequently purified as a single substance by conducting
HPLC several times on 40 ml of the fraction eluted at 30 ꢁC, using
HPLC with a COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II column (ꢁ4:6 ꢂ 250 mm,
Nacalai Tesque). Elution was performed by employing a linear
gradient with a flow velocity of 1 ml/min. We employed solutions A
(15% methanol and 0.1% formic acid) and B (99.9% methanol and
0.1% formic acid) with the initial concentration of solution A set at
100%. Gradient elution was started after 20 min, the concentration of
Materials. Corn flour (dent corn), popcorn, supersweet corn,
tomato, spinach, pumpkin, onion, potato, barley, wheat, rice, and
soybean were purchased from a market for use as materials. The fresh
materials, supersweet corn, tomato, spinach, pumpkin, onion and
potato, were freeze-dried and crushed. The dry products, corn flour and
popcorn, were crushed to prepare dry powder. SSCP was purchased
from Knorr Trading Co. (Kawasaki, Japan); SSCP was manufactured
from the kernels of supersweet corn which were harvested, crushed,
heated, dried, and processed to a powder.11) This powder was stored at
ꢀ20 ꢁC until needed.
DPPH radical-scavenging activity. Each agricultural product
sample was prepared by mixing 1 g of dry powder with 10 ml of
80% ethanol, agitating at 280 rpm for 20 min, and passing through a
0.45-mm filter for use as the test sample.
Stepwise-diluted 37.5 ml of each sample was mixed with 75 ml of a
0.1 M MES (pH 6.0)/10% ethanol solution and 37.5 ml of 400 mM
DPPH in ethanol, and the solution was kept at room temperature for
20 min. A DPPH-free reactive solution was simultaneously prepared as
a blank, and the absorbance of each solution at 520 nm was measured.
The DPPH radical-scavenging activity of each solution was calculated
from assay lines of Trolox (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mM) and
is expressed as the Trolox equivalent (Trolox eq.). The activity of each
product was determined by using four samples differing in origin. The
activity of each fraction was measured by using three samples
employing high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The
activity of each substance was determined three times.
solution
A 22 min after the start of elution being 30%. This
concentration was held until 32 min, before a linear return to the
initial condition (100% of solution A) up to 35 min after the start of
elution, and the same concentration held until 50 min. The next sample
was then injected. The target fraction was dried in the concentrating
centrifuge and then overnight in a desiccator, substituting the
atmosphere with nitrogen gas and then storing at ꢀ80 ꢁC. We obtained
approximately 10 mg of the purified substance.
Structure of the purified substance. A 1-mg sample of the purified
substance was dissolved in 1 ml of water, and the solution mixed with
18 units of ꢀ-glucosidase. This solution was reacted at 30 ꢁC for 2 h,
and then mixed with 5 ml of ethanol to stop the reaction. After the
precipitated protein had been removed by centrifugation, the super-
natant was dried in the concentrating centrifuge. A mixture of a formic
acid solution (pH 3) and 1-butanol (1:1) was added to this sample and
distributed to the respective layers. The formic acid solution layer
containing constitutive sugars was concentrated and dried, and the
material compared with an authentic substance by using 1H-NMR and
HSQC with an AV-600 spectrometer (Bruker Co., Rheinstetten,
Germany). The 1-butanol layer containing the aglycone was dried,
purified by HPLC as just described, and analyzed by 1H-NMR, HMBC,
NOESY, and H-H COSY with the Bruker AV-600 spectrometer, and
by 13C-NMR, TOCSY, and HSQC with a DMX-600 spectrometer
(Bruker Co., Rheinstetten, Germany).
Phenolic compound content. The polyphenolic content of an extract
prepared in the presence of 80% ethanol was measured by the Folin &
Ciocalteu method with gallic acid as a standard sample, and is
expressed as the gallic acid equivalent (gallic acid eq.). We added 100
ml of the sample, 100 ml of the Folin & Ciocalteu phenol reagent (Wako
Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), and 200 ml of a saturated
sodium carbonate solution to 1.6 ml of purified water, let the solution
stand for 30 min, and measured the absorbance at 760 nm. The activity
of each product was determined for four samples differing in origin.
Fractionation by HPLC. Five milliliters of an SSCP extract was
eluted at 35 ꢁC by HPLC with a COSMOSIL 5C18-MS-II column
(ꢁ20 ꢂ 250 mm, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) to fractionate the
eluate. Elution was performed with a linear gradient, using a flow
velocity of 10 ml/min. We employed solutions A (0.1% formic acid)
and B (99.9% methanol and 0.1% formic acid) with the initial
concentration of solution A set at 98%. Its subsequent concentrations
10, 30, 35, 60, and 65 min after the start of elution were 79, 77, 59, 58,
and 0%, respectively. This 0% concentration of solution A was
continued until 80 min. A linear return to the initial condition (98% of
solution A) was performed until 85 min after the start of elution, and
Purified substance (GOA). LC/MS (ESI-positive): m=z 370.1
½M þ Hꢃþ; UV (H2O): ꢂmax 248, 283 nm.
Aglycone (HOA). LC/MS (ESI-positive): m=z 207.9 ½M þ Hꢃþ;
UV (H2O): ꢂmax 246, 290 nm; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢃ: 2.63 (1H, dd,
J ¼ 7:2, 16.7 Hz), 2.86 (1H, dd, J ¼ 4:3, 16.8 Hz), 3.67 (1H, m), 6.86
(1H, m), 6.94 (1H, dd, J ¼ 4:5, 6.8 Hz), 7.10 (1H, dd, J ¼ 3:3, 8.2 Hz),
10.19 (1H, s); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢃ: 34.1 (d), 42.5 (s), 115.7 (d),
117.8 (d), 121.9 (s), 130.5 (s), 132.2 (d), 141.5 (d), 172.2 (s), 178.1 (d).