a PAL9 and a Rink linker (TentaGel S AM and TentaGel S
RAM, respectively)10 were reacted with excess 4-bromoben-
zonitrile (1a) under the conditions given in Table 1.
Table 2. Evaluation of Ligand and Solvent for Coupling of
4-Bromobenzonitrile (1a) to Rink Resina
Table 1. Coupling of 4-Bromobenzonitrile to Amine Resinsa
4-aminobenzonitrile
linker
yieldb (%)
purityc (%)
Rink
63d
64
28
36
49
87
92
53
86
90
92
Knorr
Sieber
DCHD
Tentagel S AM
Tentagel S RAM
2-chlorotritylamine
31
tracese
a Reaction performed on 0.03-0.07 mmol scale with respect to the amino
groups. b Quantitated by calibrated HPLC. c Determined by HPLC of the
crude product. d No product was formed in the absence of Pd. e Reaction
performed with 10 mol % Pd on a 0.3 mmol scale.
After 20 h reaction time in dioxane, all resins gave a
negative Kaiser test, indicating complete consumption of free
amino groups. The resin was thoroughly washed, dried, and
submitted to TFA cleavage. Gratifyingly, polystyrene resins
fitted with the Rink or the Knorr linker gave the expected
4-aminobenzonitrile (2a) in good yield and purity. The less
hindered Sieber xanthydrylamine polystyrene and DCHD
solid supports gave only a minor yield of 2a. From the two
Tentagel resins tested, only the SAM resin fitted with the
PAL-linker gave a medium yield. In contrast to the poly-
styrene-based Rink-amide, the Tentagel S RAM resin with
the Rink-amide linker gave an unsatisfactory yield of 2a.
No product could be isolated from the 2-chlorotritylamine
resin. In some cases, minor amounts (up to 5 mol % with
respect to the active sites of the resins) of benzonitrile,
formed by â-hydride elimination, could be detected in the
washing solutions. A second cycle of TFA-treatment did not
yield any additional product. We therefore assume that
degradation of the resin under the reaction conditions
accounts for the incomplete mass balance.11 To confirm that
the reaction does not proceed via an SNAr mechanism we
also submitted the Rink amide resin to the reaction without
adding a palladium source. We could not detect any aniline
product under these conditions.
a Reaction performed on 0.03-0.07 mmol scale with respect to the amino
groups on the resin. b Quantitated by calibrated HPLC. c In parentheses:
purity determined by HPLC of the crude product. d 83% isolated yield.e 20
mol % Pd(OAc)2 used instead of Pd2dba3.
NaO-t-Bu was again used as the base. A large excess of
both bromide and base (10 equiv of each with respect to the
amino groups of the resin) were used to ensure complete
reaction. Both BINAP12 and dppf efficiently catalyzed the
desired coupling of 1a to the resin, with BINAP leading to
somewhat higher yields.
In addition, a series of monodentate alkylphosphine
ligands13,14 were tested (entries 4-6) but found to be inferior
to BINAP. The two carbene ligands15 we tested (entries 7
and 8) were found to be as effective as the BINAP ligand.
Not unexpectedly, the high amount of aryl bromide in the
reaction mixture led to the formation of minor quantities of
the doubly arylated product bis(4-cyanophenyl)amine (3a)
We next investigated the most suitable combination of
ligand and solvent. Table 2 summarizes the conversion of
our standard substrate 1a with the polystyrene Rink amine
resin using different types of ligands.
(12) For a review on the Pd/BINAP-system in the amination of aryl
bromides see: Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1144-
1157.
(13) Old, D. W.; Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 9722-9723. Wolfe, J. P.; Tomori, H.; Sadighi, J. P.; Yin, J.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1158-1174.
(14) Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2570-
2573. Hartwig, J. F.; Kawatsura, M.; Hauck, S. I.; Shaughnessy, K. H.;
Alcazar-Roman, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5575-5580.
(9) Albericio, F.; Kneib-Cordonier, N.; Biancalana, S.; L.; Masada, R.
I.; Huson, D.; Barany, G.J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3730-3743.
(10) TentaGel resins were purchased from Advanced ChemTech.
(11) Gauzy, L.; Le Merrer, Y.; Depezay, J.-C.; Clerc, F.; Mignani, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6005-6008.
4690
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 26, 2002