J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9323-9324
9323
mitigate the metal’s activity. Komiyama has used a weak
complex of Ce(IV) and γ-cyclodextrin to obtain homogeneous,
neutral, aqueous solutions for the cleavage of nucleoside 3′,5′-
cyclic monophosphates13a and peptides.13d Now, we describe
three new ligands which provide stabilized, highly reactive Ce-
(IV) in nonionic Brij-35 micelles.14 These systems mediate the
cleavage of BNPP over a broad pH range (4.0-12.0) at rates
clearly surpassing those previously reported for other Ln cations.
The ligands we employed included N-octanoyl-N-methyl-D-
glucamine (2), palmitic acid/palmitate (3), and 4-(1-hexadec-
ynyl)-2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate (4). Ligands 2 and 3 were
Remarkably Rapid Cleavage of a Model
Phosphodiester by Complexed Ceric Ions in
Aqueous Micellar Solutions
Kathryn Bracken, Robert A. Moss,* and
Kaliappa G. Ragunathan
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers
The State UniVersity of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
ReceiVed May 5, 1997
The 1990’s have witnessed intense interest in the use of
lanthanide (Ln) cations to facilitate the hydrolysis of phos-
phodiesters. “Early” explorations of model DNA and RNA
hydrolyses, accelerated by various lanthanides,1 were followed
by comparative kinetic studies focused on bis(p-nitrophenyl)-
phosphate (1, BNPP), which has become an informal “standard”
phosphodiester substrate.2,3 Using BNPP, one can readily
commercially available, whereas 4 was readily prepared by Cu/
Pd(PPh3)2 catalyzed coupling of hexadecyne with diethyl
4-bromo-2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate15 (75 °C, 3 h, 72%), followed
by saponification (aq KOH, MeOH, 40 °C, 36 h, 84%). Ligand
4 was characterized by NMR and elemental analysis.
compare the accelerations provided by simple complexes of Ln
cations,2 La3+/H2O2,3,4 Ln/non-Ln clusters,5 hydroxyl-function-
alized azamacrocyclic Ln complexes,6 and paired Ln cations in
macrocylic complexes.7 Other recent applications of Ln ion
mediation have been reported for hydrolyses of DNA,8 RNA,9
hydroxyquinoline phosphodiesters or phosphonates,10 and lipo-
somal phosphodiesters.11
Mechanistically, the Ln cations serve a dual purpose: as
Lewis acids to bind and charge-neutralize the phosphodiester’s
P-O-, while simultaneously furnishing a metal-bound OH
nucleophile to attack the substrate’s phosphonyl group. Increas-
ing the metal cation’s charge density should enhance both its
Lewis acid proclivity and the acidity of its waters of hydration,
so that particular attention centers on Ce(IV), the only lanthanide
with a readily available +4 oxidation state. Applications of
Ce(IV) to DNA cleavage have been emphasized.12,13
Hydrolytic media were prepared in 2 × 10-3 M (for 2) or 5
× 10-3 M sonicated (for 3 or 4) aqueous Brij-35 solutions that
also contained 1.0 mM ligand and 0.01 M KCl. The solutions
were buffered with 0.01 M MES, HEPES, CHES, or CAPS
according to pH requirements, but solutions at pH 4, 5, or 12
were unbuffered. To initiate hydrolyses, 1.0 or 2.0 mM Ce-
(NH4)2(NO3)6 was added, the pH was adjusted with KOH, and
then 5 × 10-5 M BNPP was added. Importantly, stock solutions
of Ce(IV) were prepared at pH e1.5 to avoid hydroxide gel
formation and an accompanying reactivity decrease. Delivery
of the Ce(IV) into the ligand/Brij medium appears to stabilize
the Ce(IV) against hydroxide at higher pH.
Control experiments demonstrate that both ligand and Brij
are required to provide homogeneous Ce(IV) solutions above
pH 5.16 The critical micelle concentration of Brij-35 is 0.06-
0.09 mM,14 so that our reaction solutions are micellar. For
example, dynamic light scattering analysis of 2 + Brij or 2 +
Brij + Ce(IV) solutions reveal aggregates of ∼15-nm diameter,
consistent with micellar aggregation.
Unfortunately, above pH 4, the formation and precipitation
of Ce(IV)-hydroxide gels hinders kinetic studies of Ce(IV)-
mediated phosphodiester hydrolyses. Complexation of the Ce-
(IV) could solve this problem, but strongly bound ligands would
Rate constants for the hydrolyses of BNPP mediated by Ce-
(IV) and ligands 2-4 at various pH’s appear in Table 1. At
pH >6, kinetics were monitored at 400 nm, following released
p-nitrophenylate ions. (HPLC demonstrated that p-nitrophenol
was the sole, final organic product.) Below pH 6, p-nitrophenol
formation (317 nm) and BNPP disappearance (290 nm) were
(1) Breslow, R.; Huang, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88,
4080. Morrow, J. R.; Buttrey, L. A.; Shelton, V. M.; Berback, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1903. Morrow, J. R.; Buttrey, L. A.; Berback, K.
A. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 16. Komiyama, M.; Matsumura, K.; Matsumoto,
Y. Chem. Commun. 1992, 640.
(2) (a) Schneider, H-J.; Rammo, J.; Hettich, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1993, 32, 1716. (b) Rammo, J.; Schneider, H-J. Liebigs Ann. 1996,
1757.
(3) (a) Takasaki, B. K.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9337. (b)
Takasaki, B. K.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8582.
(4) Breslow, R.; Zhang, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7893.
(5) Takeda, N.; Irisawa, M.; Komiyama, M. Chem. Commun. 1994, 2773.
(6) Morrow, J. R.; Aures, K.; Epstein, D. Chem. Commun. 1995, 2431.
(7) Ragunathan, K. G.; Schneider, H-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 1219.
(8) Hashimoto, S.; Nakamura, Y. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1413. Rammo,
J.; Hettich, R.; Roigk, A.; Schneider, H-J. Chem. Commun. 1996, 105.
Hashimoto, S.; Nakamura, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2623.
(9) Hurst, P.; Takasaki, B. K.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
9982.
(10) Tsubouchi, A.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7893.
Tsubouchi, A.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7399.
(11) Moss, R. A.; Park, B. D.; Scrimin, P.; Ghirlanda, G. Chem. Commun.
1995, 1627.
(12) (a) Takasaki, B. K.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1121.
(b) Komiyama, M.; Kodama, T.; Takeda, N.; Sumaoka, J.; Shiiba, T.;
Matsumoto, Y.; Yashiro, M. J. Biochem. 1994, 115, 809. (c) Komiyama,
M.; Shiiba, T.; Kodama, T.; Takeda, N.; Sumaoka, J.; Yashiro, M. Chem.
Lett. 1994, 1025.
(13) (a) Sumaoka, J.; Miyama, S.; Komiyama, M. Chem. Commun. 1994,
1755. (b) Komiyama, M.; Takeda, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Uchida, H.; Shiiba,
T.; Kodama, T.; Yashiro, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 269.
(c)Takeda, N.; Imai, T.; Irisawa, M.; Sumaoka, J.; Yashiro, M.; Shigekawa,
H.; Komiyama, M. Chem. Lett. 1996, 599. (d) Yashiro, M.; Takarada, T.;
Miyama, S.; Komiyama, M. Chem. Commun. 1994, 1757. (e) Komiyama,
M.; Takeda, N.; Shiiba, T.; Takehashi, Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yashiro, M.
Nucleosides & Nucleotides 1994, 13, 1297.
(14) Previous use of Brij micelles for the solubilization of complexed
metal ions for phosphate ester hydrolysis includes: Gellman, S. H.; Petter,
R.; Breslow, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2388. Weijnen, J. G. J.;
Engbersen, J. F. J. Recl. TraV. Chim. 1993, 112, 351.
(15) Takalo, H.; Kankare, J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1987, B41, 219.
(16) Brij oxygens should assist the ligands in binding Ce(IV); crown
and cryptand ether oxygens bind Ln cations weakly in water; for example,
K ) 4 for the binding of Eu3+ by sorbitol.2b Carboxylate groups (as in 3 or
4) are more effective: Arnaud-Neu, F. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1994, 235. In
addition, Ce-ligand coordination energies might be altered in the Brij
micelles, and the reactivity of water could be enhanced. The micellar
pseudophase will also concentrate the substrate and Ce complex into a small
reaction volume, thus further enhancing the rate.
S0002-7863(97)01448-0 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society