8234
G. R. A. Adair, J. M. J. Williams / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 8233–8235
Table 4. Oxidation of other alcohols
Table 2. Optimisation of the Grubbs catalyst oxidation reaction
Base useda
Conversion (%)d
Entry
R
R0 Grubbsꢀ catalysta [(p-Cymene)RuCl2]2
b
Conversion (%)c Conversion (%)c
No base
K2CO3
Cs2CO3
DBU
6
23
75
72
85
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ph
p-FC6H4
p-MeOC6H4 Me 100
Ph
Ph
Ph(CH2)2
Tetralol
Me 100
Me 100
100
100
100
3
LiOH
H
2
LiOHb
LiOHc
100
100
Ph 54
Me 58
100
100
91
100
a 15 mol % base, 5 mol % Grubbsꢀ catalyst, PhMe, 110 °C, 24 h.
b Reaction performed over 48 h.
a PhCH = Ru(PCy3)2Cl2.
b With PPh3 (20 mol %).
c Reaction performed using second generation Grubbsꢀ catalyst.
d Conversion was determined from analysis of the 1H NMR spectra.
c Conversion was determined from analysis of the 1H NMR spectra.
48 h, whilst maintaining a gentle flow of argon in order
to remove hydrogen gas.
Table 3. Optimisation of [(p-cymene)RuCl2]2/PPh3 for oxidation
PPh3 equivalentsa
Conversion (%)b
Both catalytic systems were effective for the oxidation of
secondary alcohols, although the more hindered alco-
hol, benzhydrol (entry 5), was oxidised more slowly by
Grubbsꢀ catalyst. The alcohol remote from the phenyl
ring, 4-phenyl-2-butanol (entry 6), also underwent a
slower oxidation, as expected.8 A representative sample
of ketones was isolated by column chromatography
showing isolated yields to be broadly comparable to
the conversion attained. For example, p-methoxyphen-
ethyl alcohol (entry 3) was isolated in 84% and 97%
yields using the Grubbs and ruthenium p-cymene cata-
lyst systems, respectively. In the presence of excess base,
small amounts (typically 5–10%) of reduced aldol con-
densation products were observed, presumably formed
by self aldol condensation of the ketone, followed by
alkene hydrogenation.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
24
45
62
81
83
85
90
a 2.5 mol % dimer (5 mol % in Ru), 15 mol % LiOH, PhMe, 110 °C,
24 h.
b Conversion was determined from analysis of the 1H NMR spectra.
catalysts, as shown in Table 2 for Grubbsꢀ catalyst and
Table 3 for the ruthenium p-cymene complex. Caesium
carbonate, DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene)
and lithium hydroxide were all found to be suitable
bases using the Grubbs catalyst.
The attempted oxidation of the primary alcohol, benzyl
alcohol 5 is noteworthy, since both catalysts essentially
fail in this case. We thought that the initially formed
benzaldehyde might de-activate the catalyst via the for-
mation of a ruthenium carbonyl complex.9 We therefore
performed an experiment where both benzyl alcohol 5
and phenethyl alcohol 1 were present, anticipating the
benzyl alcohol or benzaldehyde formed to deactivate
the catalyst, thus preventing the oxidation of the phen-
ethyl alcohol. Interestingly, all of the benzyl alcohol
and phenethyl alcohol were consumed during the course
of the reaction, however, no benzaldehyde or acetophe-
none was detected. Instead, the products formed were
ketone 8 and alcohol 9 (Scheme 3).
In the case of the ruthenium p-cymene complex, the
addition of triphenylphosphine was found to be benefi-
cial, as shown in Table 3. In subsequent reactions, we
employed four equivalents of phosphine as a compro-
mise between reactivity and the requirement for excess
phosphine.
The oxidation of a range of alcohols was then performed
using both the Grubbs catalyst and the [(p-cym-
ene)RuCl2]2/PPh3 system using the optimised conditions
(Scheme 2). The alcohols were successfully oxidised to
the corresponding ketones in moderate to quantitative
conversion as shown in Table 4.
Using the catalyst PhCH = Ru(PCy3)2Cl2, ketone 8 and
alcohol 9 were formed in 26% and 74% yield, whilst for
the catalyst [(p-cymene)RuCl2]2 the ratio was 52% to
48%.
In a typical experiment, alcohol (3 mmol), ruthenium
catalyst (0.15 mmol in Ru) and LiOHÆH2O (0.45 mmol,
18.9 mg) were heated at reflux in toluene (3 mL) for
We assume that during the oxidation reaction, the benz-
aldehyde and acetophenone formed react together via
an aldol condensation, a process which serves to remove
the aldehyde thus discouraging the catalyst deactivation.
The aldol condensation product is then reduced as out-
lined in Scheme 3. Cho, Shim and co-workers have
reported a related reaction involving the coupling of
primary and secondary alcohols, which required the
OH
R'
O
a,b
5 mol% Ru Catalyst
+
H2
R
R
R'
15 mol% LiOH
PhMe, 48 h, reflux
3
4
Flow of Ar
Scheme 2. Oxidation of other alcohols with ruthenium catalysts.
a5 mol% in Ru. b20 mol % PPh3 employed with [(p-cymene)RuCl2]2.